ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    September
    20,
    1973
    I
    EUGENE THOMPSON,
    )
    i
    Petitioner,
    3
    PCB
    73—274
    v.
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    I
    Respondent.
    )
    I
    OPINION AND ORDER OF
    THE
    BOARD
    (by Mr. Seaman)
    On July
    5,
    1973,
    Petitioner, Eugene Thompson, the owner
    I
    of certain land located in North Chicago, County of Lake,
    Illinois, filed his Petition for Variance.
    Petitioner
    requests a variance from Order No.
    7 of League of Women
    Voters v. North Shore Sanitary District, PCB 70-7,
    12,
    13
    and 14 to obtain
    a sewer connection for a single family
    dwelling tributary to the North Chicago Sewage Treatment
    Plant.
    I
    Petitioner alleges that
    he
    owns certain land in North
    I
    Chicago upon which he intends to build a home.
    Petitioner
    is presently residing in a one-bedroom apartment with his
    I
    wife and three-year-old child.
    Petitioner’s sole argument
    is
    as follows:
    I
    This
    is not good for the child nor us.
    Living
    in an apartment puts limitations and pressures on
    all of us.
    Our child can~tproperly engage in the
    activities that are essential for normal growth
    and development.
    It is very hard to keep a child
    of that age from disturbing the other tenants.
    I
    He can’t play outside because, there
    is no yard
    for him to play in.
    I
    This
    is the substance of
    the
    one—page Petition, which
    I
    is in many respects so deficient and incomplete that the
    Board cannot find sufficient allegations upon which a
    I
    reasoned decision can be made.
    We
    must,
    therefore,
    dismiss
    the
    Petition without prejudice.
    9— 311

    A variance from
    a sewer
    ban
    may be appropriate when
    a particular petitioner is experiencing extremely un-
    favorable living conditions
    with
    no viable alternative
    I
    solutions.
    (McAdams v.
    Environmental Protection Agency,
    PCB 71-113,
    Pena
    v.
    Environmental Protection Agency,
    PCB 71—253)
    .
    The McAdams family, consisting of four
    persons, resided in
    a one—bedroom apartment which
    the
    family had been asked to vacate.
    The Penn family lived
    I
    in a small apartment which was subject to vandalism,
    floodinq and rodent infestation.
    I
    Here, Petitioner has failed to allege the absence of
    I
    viable alternative solutions.
    Petitioner is urged to
    familiarize himself with Rule 401 of the Procedural Rules
    I
    of the Illinois Pollution Control Board and consider
    Marc Baron v.
    Environmental Protection Agency
    (PCB 73-195)
    I
    and Bereskin v. Environmental Protection Agency
    (PCB 73-143),
    although l3ereskin pertained
    to the Clavey Road sewage
    I
    Treatment Plant.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and
    I
    conclusions of law of the Board.
    ORDER
    I
    IT IS
    THE
    ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that
    the Petition of Eugene Thompson be dismissed without
    prejudice.
    Mr. Marder abstains.
    I
    1, Christan
    L. Moffett,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    I
    Control Board, certify that the above Opinion and Order
    was adopted by the Board on the
    c~
    day of
    ,
    I
    1973, by
    a vote of
    4./
    to
    9— 312

    Back to top