ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    March
    28,
    1974
    CITY OF SILVIS,
    Petitioner,
    V.
    )
    PCB 74—88
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE
    BOARD
    (by Mr. Henss)
    City of Silvis requests variance from Order No.
    10 of
    Environmental Protection Agency vs. City of Silvis,
    PCB 71-157.
    Order No.
    10 prohibited the Cities of Silvis and East Moline
    from constructing any new sewers or any source of waste that
    would flow to their waste treatment facilities.
    The Cities
    Were also prohibited under Order No.
    10 from increasing the
    strength or concentration of the influent to the waste treat-
    ment facility unless permitted to do so by “variance or otherwise”.
    Petitioner now seeks permission
    to connect about 120 lots
    ~o its present sewer system.
    The residential area of concern
    iS
    located on 13th and 14th Streets
    in the Silvis Heights Addition
    and on 15th Street in the Edgewood Addition.
    George
    0. Barr
    school is located in this area.
    At present, Silvis provides only primary treatment of its
    sewage prior to discharging the waste to the Rock River.
    Raw
    sewage is sometimes discharged to the river.
    On June 22, 1971
    the Environmental Protection Agency filed a Complaint against
    Silvis charging that the sewage was inadequately treated and
    was polluting the Rock River.
    The Pollution Control Board held
    that Silvis “was and has been for some time in violation of the
    Environmental Protection Act.”
    because of its pollutional discharge
    (PCB 71—157).
    Petitioner has been under
    a sewer connection ban for over
    4 1/2 years.
    The first ban was imposed by the Sanitary Water
    Board in August 1969.
    However, the sewage treatment today
    is
    much
    the same as it was when the ban was first imposed.
    11
    —719

    —2—
    The City now asks us
    to act as ouickly as possible on the
    variance petition because there has been an outbreak of infectious
    hepatitis and the situation is “critical”.
    From December 1973
    through February 1974 at least
    7 children attending Barr school
    were found to have infectious hepatitis.
    A parent of
    a child
    attending Barr school also contracted the disease.
    Our decision
    today comes just
    21 days
    after the City petitioned for a variance
    and under the law could not have been made earlier.
    (EPA Section
    37.)
    The affidavit of Fred Siebenmann,
    Jr., Administrator of
    the Division of Environmental Health,
    Rock Island County Health
    Department was submitted in support ~f the variance petition.
    In a survey conducted during July and August 1973 Siebenmann
    found that almost 40
    of the on—site septic systems were visibly
    discharging effluent in yards and down natural or man—made
    drainage ways with no room available for making new septic fields.
    It was not positively proved that the standing sewage had caused
    the hepatitis outbreak, but Siebenmann said the fact that the
    children “live in or near unsewered neighborhoods strongly
    suggests sewage origin”.
    He said the “highly concentrated effluent
    has all of the potential for spreading enteric diseases and in--
    fectious hepatitis”.
    In City of Silvis vs. EPA,
    PCB 72-141,
    this Board allowed
    Petitioner a variance from Order No.
    10 in order to connect
    23
    homes under circumstances similar to those presented in the instant
    case.
    In PCB 72-141 Siebenrnann testified as to the conditions
    he
    had observed near the 23 homes:
    “Given the right sequence of
    events, we can have an enteric disease outbreak, probably hepatitis;
    ~ou
    have to have someone in the neighborhood with
    a disease and
    in
    a system that
    is now functioning in order for the organisms
    to
    get into the effluent on the surface of the ground but it is
    ty~icaIand normal for the children in this neighborhood...to
    frequent the shores of the stream and play there,
    so the potential
    (exists)
    for the children as well as these adults
    who
    frequent the
    shores of the stream
    to get a disease.”
    it now appears that the
    pc~ntial has been realized.
    The Agency recommends granting
    this
    variance subject to
    certain
    conditions.
    In
    its
    Recommendation
    the
    Agency
    stated.
    “that
    the
    immediate
    consideration
    of
    human
    welfare
    must
    over—ride
    any
    ccnsideration
    for
    the
    environment
    and water quality of the
    ~ock Piver.”
    ~e concur.
    However, the Agency points out that
    OfliV
    7~of the
    120
    lots are presently improved.
    Again the
    sir’iiarity between this case and PCB 72-141 is obse~ved.
    In
    ~-~‘c°
    72~14lSilvis sought the connection
    of
    6 unimproved lots
    in
    sdciition
    to
    the
    23 improved lots.
    As
    we
    did in PCB 72-141,
    e shall permit connections
    to be provided for only those lots that
    —-
    T~2:

    —3—
    are presently rleveloped.~
    Clearly the additional
    44 lots are not
    creating any health problems and to allow connections for those
    lots would only encourage their development thereby aggravating
    an already much too serious problem.
    The sewage problems
    in Silvis have existed too long.
    The
    community was slow in addressing these problems, but in recent
    years, the upgrading of the Silvis sewer system has been compli-
    cated by “regionalization”.
    In PCB 71-157 the Board approved a
    plan for Silvis
    to complete construction of an interceptor main
    to the East £4oline facility by the date when the City of East
    Moline completes
    the construction of its new and larger regional
    treatment facilities.
    Originally this completion date was to have
    been December 31,
    1973.
    Since that Order,
    a number of events have
    occurred including the impoundment of sewage treatment plant con-
    struction funds by President Nixon.
    Further aggravating this
    problem was the enactment of
    a provision in the Federal Water
    Pollution Control Act of
    1972 stating that any inuncipality which
    starts construction before receiving a Federal grant is barred
    from any reimbursement from the Federal Government.
    In response
    to these events the Board postponed until
    December 31,
    1974 the reauirement to meet effluent standards for
    any discharger
    to the waters of the State who is or will be eligible
    for a construction grant.
    (Rule 409, Water Pollution Control Regu-
    lations).
    Construction of the East Moline facility is proceeding but,
    according to the Agency,
    the contractor states that the new East
    Moline facility will not be equipped to rece~iveany flow from
    Silvis before December
    1,
    1974.
    Silvi~cannot wait for the inter-
    ceptor connection to be completed.
    The health hazard is too great.
    We shall allow
    a variance for the connection of only the 76
    lots
    upon which homes and septic systems now exist.
    As
    a condition of
    this variance we will require Silvis to
    closely oversee the installation of any additional septic systems.
    Septic systems which will become a health hazard are not to be
    installed.
    Both the Board and the Agency are required by law “to
    establish
    a unified, statewide program... to restore, protect,
    and
    enhance the quality of the environment.
    .
    .“
    Environmental
    Protection
    Act, Section
    2(b)
    The ban on sewer connection has been
    a useful
    tool in carrying out this legislative purpose in those communities
    which for one reason or another, have been unable to upgrade an
    inadequate sewage treatment facility or have been faced with unusual
    economic growth leading to an overloading of the treatment facilitic
    The intent of the ban is
    to cause an upgrading of sewage treatment
    The installation of septic systems
    as a method of complying with
    the ban might not serve this purpose.
    The EPA recommends
    that
    construction of residences utilizing septic systems be prohibi
    1
    1
    --
    72’~

    —4—
    where soil
    conriitions,
    lot size and housing density indicate that
    septic systems will he inadequate.
    Such a prohibition is appro-
    priate
    in this case.
    Statements regarding adequacy of the septic
    systems shall be made by the Division of Environmental Health,
    Rock Island County Health Department.
    ORDER
    It
    is the Order of the Pollution uontrol Board that the
    City
    of Silvis be granted a variance from Order No.
    10 of
    Environmental Protection Agency vs. City of Silvis, PCB 71—157
    for the purpose of allowing sewer connections for 76 improved
    lots,
    as shown
    (in yellow color)
    in Petitioner’s application
    for variance, Exhibit C.
    This variance is subject to the
    following conditions
    1.
    City of Silvis shall prohibit future development
    of residences
    utilizing septic systems where
    soil conditions, lot size,
    and housing density
    indicate that a septic system will be inadequate.
    Prior to permitting construction of residences
    which will utilize septic systems,
    the City shall
    obtain
    a statement from the Administrator of the
    Division of Environmental Health, Rock Island
    County Health Department,
    that the septic system
    will meet accepted public health standards.
    2.
    City of Silvis shall, within 180 days from the
    date of this Order,
    complete the planning process
    preliminaries necessary for the securing of
    Federal and State funds to finance the connection
    with the East Moline sewage treatment plant.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order was adopte~
    this
    ~
    day of
    .
    ~.
    L_.
    ,
    1974 by
    a vote of
    ~
    to
    C
    ~..
    )
    11
    722

    Back to top