ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
November 8,
1973
)
VILLAGE OF GRAYSLAKE
)
)
)
V.
PCB
73-308
)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
)
)
MR.
LAWRENCE DUNLAP OF OVERHOLSER, FLANNERY,
DUNLAP, AND GRAHAM,
appeared on behalf of the Village
of Grayslake.
MR. LEE CAMPBELL, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, appeared on behalf
of the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr. Dumelle)
The Village of Grayslake filed
a Petition for Variance on
July 30,
1973.
The Agency filed
its Recommendation to deny
the variance petition on August
30,
1973.
Petitioner
filed a
Waiver
of the ninety day
decision period on October
2,
1973.
Hearing was held on September 27,
1973.
The petitioner owns
and operates
a secondary sewage treatment
facility,
located in Lake County.
This facility has a design BOD
loading
of 9,040
P.
E.
Petitioner’s treatment facility includes
2 package activated sludge units and a trickling filter.
Secondary
treated effluent flows
to
a 2-cell, polishing pond and is chlorinated
prior to being discharged
to the Avon-Freemont Drainage Ditch, an
intermittent stream which flows
into Third Lake,
a recreational
Lake,
located approximately
2 miles downstream from the treatment plant
outfall.
Third Lake discharges
to Mill Creek,
a tributary of the
Des Plaines
River.
Petitioner in its Amended Petition for Variance seeks
an
extension until December 31,
1975
to comply with the requirement
of Rule 203(c), 404(f),
406, and 602 of Chapter
3 of the B~ardts
Rules and Regulations governing
Water Pollution.
Petitioner alleges
that
a preliminary engineering analysis
indicated that requisite sewage treatment plant upgrading would
cost an estimated $172,300
(assuming that present ammonia nitrogen
removal efficiency is
adequate).
Petitioner anticipates only
10—35
-2-
minimal improvement in water quality in
the Avon-Freemont Drainage
Ditch and Third Lake
if timely compliance with appreciable water
pollution standards
is achieved consequently, Petitioner contends
the cost of such compliance
in the absence of appreciable results
could cause an
imposition of an arbitrary
and unreasonable hardship.
The Agency recommended that the Board dismiss
as premature
the Petition for Variance from Rule 404(f)
and 602
as being pre-
mature because the Board
in adopting Rule 409 of Chapter
3 extended
the compliance date of any effluent standard required
on December 31,
1973 to December
31,
1974.
The Board agrees
and therefore orders
that the Petitioner request for
a variance from Rule 404(f)
and 602
be dismissed
as premature.
Petitioner’s request
for a variance from
Rule 406 until December 31,
1975,
is
also premature and therefore
dismissed because
the effective date of Rule
406
is December 31,
1977.
The only remaining
issue
is
a variance from Rule
203(c) which
states”that phosphorus
shall not exceed 0.05 mg/i
in any lake or
in any stream at the point where
it enters any lake.”
Water samples
taken at Petitioner’s outfall and at
a point below the outfall showed
phosphorus
levels
of
2.35 and 1.27 mg/i of phosphorus.
Water samples
taken at the outfall of Third Lake showed a phosphorus
level of
0.13 mg/i.
This
level
is
above the limit set by Rule
203(c)
(R.
88,
9-27-73).
Petitioner has estimated that
0.1 mg/l
of phosphorus
is
contributed from agricultural runoff on
an annual basis.
Citizen
testimony from the Acting Village Engineer of the Community of Third
Lake showed that
the Lake experienced an algae problem
(R.
123,
9-27-73).
Grayslake
is said to have agreed in the past
to provide
money for the control by the Village of Third Lake,
of algae present
in Third Lake
(R.
123, 92773).
Spraying
for algae
control
is
said
to have produced a two-foot thick layer of dead algae
at
the
bottom of the Lake
(R.
123,
9-27-73).
Phosphorus
and other nutrients
from such dead algae would
tend
to be re-introduced into Third Lake
by normal breakdown of the algal cells.
Mr. Eugene Theios, Director
of the Division of Environmental Health of Lake County Health
Department, testified that
the algae present in Third Lake did not
constitute
a health problem
(R.
135,
9-27-73).
He further testified
that a delay in two years of removing the phosphorus
discharges
from
the Third Lake would not have any additional
or different affect
than
it has had in the past two years
(R.
139,
9-27-73).
Mr.
Leckman, Petitioner’s
consulting engineer, testified that
he estimated the cost for phosphorus removal
to be approximately
$55,000
(R.
92, 9-27-73).
Petitioner
is currently undertaking
actions which will
lead
to
an agreement with
the Lake County
Public Works Department
to enable the diversion of Petitioner’s
sewage by means of a proposed interceptor sewer from the existing
sewage treatment plant to the North Shore Sanitary District proposed
Gurnee Treatment facility.
Completion of the proposed Gurnee
10—36
-3-
Treatment Plant
is scheduled for January
1,
1975.
Completion of
the interceptor
sewer
is scheduled for December 31,
1974.
In the
event
that the Gurnee Treatment Plant
is not completed by January
1,
1975, Petitioner should be able
to discharge its treated effluent
into
the interceptor sewer.
This would allow Petitioner
to by-pass
Third Lake and discharge directly into the Des Plaines River which
has
a higher allowable phosphorus
limit
(R.
107,
9-27-73).
The
Board finds
that such
a delay
in compliance with Rule 203
(c)
would
not result in significant degradation of Third Lake providing
the
projected completion date
for the interceptor sewer
system and the
Gurnee Treatment Plant are not substantially delayed from the above
dates.
This Opinion constitutes
the Board’s findings
of facts
and
conclusions
of law.
ORDER
The Illinois Pollution Control Board hereby grants
to the
Village of Grayslake
a variance from Rule
203(c) until November
8,
1974.
The Board dismisses without prejudice Petitioner’s
request
for variances from Rules 404(f),
406,
and 602
as premature.
I,
Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were adopted on the
~
day of November,
1973 by a vote of _______________________
~
Illinois Pollution
ntrol
Board
10—37