ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    November 8,
    1973
    )
    VILLAGE OF GRAYSLAKE
    )
    )
    )
    V.
    PCB
    73-308
    )
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    )
    )
    MR.
    LAWRENCE DUNLAP OF OVERHOLSER, FLANNERY,
    DUNLAP, AND GRAHAM,
    appeared on behalf of the Village
    of Grayslake.
    MR. LEE CAMPBELL, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, appeared on behalf
    of the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Dumelle)
    The Village of Grayslake filed
    a Petition for Variance on
    July 30,
    1973.
    The Agency filed
    its Recommendation to deny
    the variance petition on August
    30,
    1973.
    Petitioner
    filed a
    Waiver
    of the ninety day
    decision period on October
    2,
    1973.
    Hearing was held on September 27,
    1973.
    The petitioner owns
    and operates
    a secondary sewage treatment
    facility,
    located in Lake County.
    This facility has a design BOD
    loading
    of 9,040
    P.
    E.
    Petitioner’s treatment facility includes
    2 package activated sludge units and a trickling filter.
    Secondary
    treated effluent flows
    to
    a 2-cell, polishing pond and is chlorinated
    prior to being discharged
    to the Avon-Freemont Drainage Ditch, an
    intermittent stream which flows
    into Third Lake,
    a recreational
    Lake,
    located approximately
    2 miles downstream from the treatment plant
    outfall.
    Third Lake discharges
    to Mill Creek,
    a tributary of the
    Des Plaines
    River.
    Petitioner in its Amended Petition for Variance seeks
    an
    extension until December 31,
    1975
    to comply with the requirement
    of Rule 203(c), 404(f),
    406, and 602 of Chapter
    3 of the B~ardts
    Rules and Regulations governing
    Water Pollution.
    Petitioner alleges
    that
    a preliminary engineering analysis
    indicated that requisite sewage treatment plant upgrading would
    cost an estimated $172,300
    (assuming that present ammonia nitrogen
    removal efficiency is
    adequate).
    Petitioner anticipates only
    10—35

    -2-
    minimal improvement in water quality in
    the Avon-Freemont Drainage
    Ditch and Third Lake
    if timely compliance with appreciable water
    pollution standards
    is achieved consequently, Petitioner contends
    the cost of such compliance
    in the absence of appreciable results
    could cause an
    imposition of an arbitrary
    and unreasonable hardship.
    The Agency recommended that the Board dismiss
    as premature
    the Petition for Variance from Rule 404(f)
    and 602
    as being pre-
    mature because the Board
    in adopting Rule 409 of Chapter
    3 extended
    the compliance date of any effluent standard required
    on December 31,
    1973 to December
    31,
    1974.
    The Board agrees
    and therefore orders
    that the Petitioner request for
    a variance from Rule 404(f)
    and 602
    be dismissed
    as premature.
    Petitioner’s request
    for a variance from
    Rule 406 until December 31,
    1975,
    is
    also premature and therefore
    dismissed because
    the effective date of Rule
    406
    is December 31,
    1977.
    The only remaining
    issue
    is
    a variance from Rule
    203(c) which
    states”that phosphorus
    shall not exceed 0.05 mg/i
    in any lake or
    in any stream at the point where
    it enters any lake.”
    Water samples
    taken at Petitioner’s outfall and at
    a point below the outfall showed
    phosphorus
    levels
    of
    2.35 and 1.27 mg/i of phosphorus.
    Water samples
    taken at the outfall of Third Lake showed a phosphorus
    level of
    0.13 mg/i.
    This
    level
    is
    above the limit set by Rule
    203(c)
    (R.
    88,
    9-27-73).
    Petitioner has estimated that
    0.1 mg/l
    of phosphorus
    is
    contributed from agricultural runoff on
    an annual basis.
    Citizen
    testimony from the Acting Village Engineer of the Community of Third
    Lake showed that
    the Lake experienced an algae problem
    (R.
    123,
    9-27-73).
    Grayslake
    is said to have agreed in the past
    to provide
    money for the control by the Village of Third Lake,
    of algae present
    in Third Lake
    (R.
    123, 92773).
    Spraying
    for algae
    control
    is
    said
    to have produced a two-foot thick layer of dead algae
    at
    the
    bottom of the Lake
    (R.
    123,
    9-27-73).
    Phosphorus
    and other nutrients
    from such dead algae would
    tend
    to be re-introduced into Third Lake
    by normal breakdown of the algal cells.
    Mr. Eugene Theios, Director
    of the Division of Environmental Health of Lake County Health
    Department, testified that
    the algae present in Third Lake did not
    constitute
    a health problem
    (R.
    135,
    9-27-73).
    He further testified
    that a delay in two years of removing the phosphorus
    discharges
    from
    the Third Lake would not have any additional
    or different affect
    than
    it has had in the past two years
    (R.
    139,
    9-27-73).
    Mr.
    Leckman, Petitioner’s
    consulting engineer, testified that
    he estimated the cost for phosphorus removal
    to be approximately
    $55,000
    (R.
    92, 9-27-73).
    Petitioner
    is currently undertaking
    actions which will
    lead
    to
    an agreement with
    the Lake County
    Public Works Department
    to enable the diversion of Petitioner’s
    sewage by means of a proposed interceptor sewer from the existing
    sewage treatment plant to the North Shore Sanitary District proposed
    Gurnee Treatment facility.
    Completion of the proposed Gurnee
    10—36

    -3-
    Treatment Plant
    is scheduled for January
    1,
    1975.
    Completion of
    the interceptor
    sewer
    is scheduled for December 31,
    1974.
    In the
    event
    that the Gurnee Treatment Plant
    is not completed by January
    1,
    1975, Petitioner should be able
    to discharge its treated effluent
    into
    the interceptor sewer.
    This would allow Petitioner
    to by-pass
    Third Lake and discharge directly into the Des Plaines River which
    has
    a higher allowable phosphorus
    limit
    (R.
    107,
    9-27-73).
    The
    Board finds
    that such
    a delay
    in compliance with Rule 203
    (c)
    would
    not result in significant degradation of Third Lake providing
    the
    projected completion date
    for the interceptor sewer
    system and the
    Gurnee Treatment Plant are not substantially delayed from the above
    dates.
    This Opinion constitutes
    the Board’s findings
    of facts
    and
    conclusions
    of law.
    ORDER
    The Illinois Pollution Control Board hereby grants
    to the
    Village of Grayslake
    a variance from Rule
    203(c) until November
    8,
    1974.
    The Board dismisses without prejudice Petitioner’s
    request
    for variances from Rules 404(f),
    406,
    and 602
    as premature.
    I,
    Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were adopted on the
    ~
    day of November,
    1973 by a vote of _______________________
    ~
    Illinois Pollution
    ntrol
    Board
    10—37

    Back to top