ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD
November
8,
1973
THE CITY OF PERU,
Petitioner,
vs.
)
PCB 73—255
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr.
Seaman):
On August
16,
1973,
Petitioner, the City of Peru,
located in La Salle County,
Illinois, filed its Amended
Petition for Variance.
Petitioner operates an electric
power generating facility which utilizes the following
power sources:
Electrical
Power Source
Date of Installation
Generating Capacity
Boiler
3
1937
3,750 KW
Boiler 4
1951
4,000 KW
Boiler 5
1960
7,500 KW
Gas Turbine
1968
11,500 KW
7,800 KW
Diesel
1973
6,250 KW
Boiler #3, the operation of which is the subject of
this Petition,
is described by Petitioner
as a “small,
obsolete,
low pressure,
inefficient boiler that is normally
not operated but which has value for emergency stand-by
purposes to be operated one or more days in the event two or
more of the other primary generating machines breaks down
during a high electrical demand period.
Boiler
#3
is
coal powered but is not equipped with a dust collector.
Because of the low steam pressure
(185- PSIG) produced by
this
boiler,
the
generating cycle
is highly inefficient
10—25
resulting in high operating costs.
This precludes any
operation of the boiler except in emergencies.~
(Petition,
p.2).
Petitioner further alleges that Boiler
#3 will
probably never have to be used; however,
in the event
of
a most unusual set of circumstances which would
shut down two or more of the primary generating machines,
Petitioner by this action seeks permission to operate
Boiler #3 until the situation is corrected.
Petitioner
states that the emission rates of Boiler
#3 are as
follows:
State Regulation
Boiler #3
Emission
—
Limit
Emission Rate
Particulates
0.2 #/MM Btu input
1.03 #/MM But imput
Sulfur Dioxide
6 #/MM But input
3.8 #/MM Btu input
Nitrogen Oxides
No regulation
Carbon Monoxide
200 ppM
0 ppM
As can be seen above,
the particulate
emission
exceeds the state limitation.
With a maximum heat input
of
55 MM Btu per hour,
the maximum particulate emission
rate would be
56.6 lbs. per hour.
Petitioner estimates the cost of bringing Boiler
#3
into compliance to be from $150,000.00 to $200,000.00.
This approximation is based upon installation of a dust
collector, an ash handling system and a new fan and duct
work.
We are disposed to grant the variance as requested.
The Agency,
in its Recommendation,
notes that
Petitioner
does not propose any compliance program for Boiler
#3.
Although the Agency recommends that a variance be granted
herein,
it recommends also that Petitioner be ordered to
achieve compliance within
the period of the variance.
We cannot agree.
Exclusive of the 3,750 NW of Boiler #3, and using
the low 7,800 NW capacity for the gas turbine,
Petitioner’s
plant capacity is 25,550 NW.
Petitioner’s record maximum
electrical output of 17,100 NW was set on July 9,
1973.
Further, Boiler #3 has not been operated since April,
1972.
—2—
10
—
We
feel,
therefore,
that it would constitute an
unreasonable hardship to require Petitioner
to invest
from $150,000.00 to $200,000.00 in order to bring into
compliance
a boiler which would be used infrequently, and
possibly never.
The Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and
conclusions
of law of the Board.
ORDER
IT
IS
THE
ORDER of
the Pollution Control Board
that Petition, City of Peru,
be granted
a variance,
for’ a period of one year from the date of this Order,
to operate
the subject Boiler
#3 subject to the following
conditions:
1.
Boiler #3
shall be operated only when two
or more
of the primary generating machines
are forced out of service and the power
demand exceeds available capacity;
2.
Petitioner shall file quarterly reports
with the Agency.
Said reports shall indicate
all operations of Boiler
No.
3, the date
of
said operation,
kilowatts generated
by each generator on each day of operation,
generators
forced
out
of
service
on
each
day
of
operation
of
Boiler
No.
3
and
the
reason for the forced outage and the power
demand to supply customers on each day
of operation of Boiler No.
3.
3.
Petitioner
shall report to the Agency its
progress in obtaining an interconnection
with Illinois Power Company and,
in particular,
the disposition of its case currently pending
before the Federal Power Commission
(Docket
No.
E 7512)
I,
Christari L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois
Pollution Control Board,
certify that the above
Opinion and Order was adopted this
~‘+‘1
day of
__________________
1973 by a vote of
~
to
~
10
—
27