ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
September 12, 1974
ILLINI ~OftILtIITYHOSPITAL,
Petitioner,
)
PC8
74—128
ENVI RONIENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
S
Respondent.
I
OPINION
AND ORDER OF
THE
BOARD (by Mr. Seaman):
On April 3, 1974, Illini Ccwiunity Hospital filed
its
Petition
For Variance, seeking therein permission to continue operation of
its non-approved incinerator until said incinerator can ~e
replaced
by a unit approved by the Agency. Specifically, relief is sought
from
Illinois Pollution Control
Board
Regulations, Chapter 2, Part I,
Rule 103(b) and Illinois Pollution Control Board Regulations, Chapter
2, Part II,
Rule
2O3(e)(3).
Petitioner is a not-for-profit Illinois Corporation with total
revenues in fiscal year 1973 of 1.7 million dollars ($1,700,000).
Petitioner operates a hospital in Pittsfield, Pike County, Illinois.
The subject of the Petition for Variance is a single chamber unfired
incinerator vented to a boiler stack fifty feet
(SOS)
high. Petitioner
processes in this incinerator approximately 500 pounds of waste
daily.
Rule 203(e)(3) limits Petitioner5s incinerator to maximum allowable
emissions of 0.2 grains per standard cubic foot of effluent gases
at 1.3 grains per standard cubic foot. The emissions to be expected
from the burning of Petitioner5s wastes in an unfired incinerator are:
Particulates
35 lb/ton
Carbon Monoxide
300 lb/ton
Hydrocarbons
100 lb/ton
Nitrogen Oxides
I lb/ton
Sulfur Oxides
negligible
Petitioner burns about 500 pounds per day and therefore
the anticipated emissions
would be:
Particulates
8.75 lb/day
Carbon Monoxide
75.00 lb/day
Hydrocarbons
25.00 lb/day
Nitrogen Oxides
.25 lb/day
Sulfur Oxides
negligible
13-577
Petitioner~s proposed compliance plan contemplates the installation
of a Federal Enterprises Model FE-3 double burner incinerator. The
Agency is convinced that this incinerator can meet applicable regu-
lations for types 0, 1 or 2 wastes if waste consumption is limited
to 140 pounds per hour and the primary and secondary burners heat
input is rated at 350,000 BTU for both secondary burners. Petitioner’s
timetable is:
Order New Incinerator
7-1-74
Delivery
11-1-74
Operable by
1—1-75
Acting promptly upon the suggestion of an Agency representative,
Petitioner has investigated the alternative of hauling away refuse
until the new incinerator is installed and operativve. The cost of
hauling refuse would be ~60.00per month. Based on a three-month period
to replace the
existing incinerator
with a suitable substitute, the
total
projected expense of hauling would be approximately $180.00.
Our Order will allow Petitioner to operate the subject incinerator
until October 1, 1974 in order to allow Petitioner sufficient time to
arrange for its refuse to be hauled to an approved landfill site. The
cost to Petitioner will be minimal compared to adverse affect that
continued violative emissions would have
Ofl
the community.
This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of
law of the Board.
IT IS THE ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that Illini Community
Hospital be granted a variance from the provisions of Rule 203(e)(3)
until October l, 1974 to allow the continued operation of the subject
incinerator until that date, subject to the following conditions:
I.
Petitioner shall arrange to have its wastes hauled to an approved
landfill site until such time as the new incinerator is operational.
2. Petitioner shall submit monthly progress reports to the
Agency at the following address:
Environmental Protection Agency
Division of Mr Pollution Control
Variance Section
2200 Churchill Road
Springfield, Illinois 62706
3. Petitioner shall submit Construction and Operating Permit
Applications to the Agency as required by the Illinois Pollution Control
Board Regulations.
13
—
578
I, Christan L ~ffett.Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, certify that the above Opinion and Order was adopted on this
~
day ~
1974 by a vote of
13—579