ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
September
12,
1974
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Complainant,
CITY OF ROCKFORD,
an Illinois municipal
corporation,
ROCKFORD DISPOSAL SERVICE, INC~, a Delaware
PCB 74-124
corporation,
BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF ROCKFORD, INC~,
a Delaware corporation,
PAUL N~SAHLSTROM,
an individual, and
SAHLSTROM BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC~,an Illinois
corporation,
Respondents
Mr. James M~Jenks,
II, attorney for Comp1ainant~.
Mr. Steven M~McCarthy, attorney for Respondent City of Rockforth
Mr. William E~Collins, attorney for Respondents Paul Sahistrom
and Sahistrom Building
Products,
Inc~
Mr.
Richard Staples,
attorney for Respondents Browning—Ferris
Industries and Rockford Disposal Service.
OPINION
ANI)
ORDER OF
THE BOARD
(by Dr~Odell)
On April
1,
1974,
the Environmental Protection Agency
(Agency)
filed
a Complaint with the Pollution
Control
Board
(Board)
alleging numerous violations of the Environmental Protection Act
(Act)
and the regulations~
The Complaint contained six counts for
violations supposedly occurring from July
1,
1970,
through April
1,
1974~ Complainant specified many dates throughout this period when
violations allegedly occurred.
The alleged offences
resulted from
the improper operation of three refuse disposal sites, i.e~,sites
I,
II, and III,
which
are all proximately located at Peoples Avenue
and Magnolia Street in Rockford, Illinois.
The Complaint charged that Respondents violated Sections 21(a),
(b), and
(e)
of the Act by the open dumping of garbage, by violat-
ing certain regulations regarding landfills,
and by operating sites
I and III without
a permit.
Violations were charged against the
Rules and Regulations For Refuse Disposal Sites
and Facilities
(Rules and Regulations)
as well as alleged violations
of
the Solid
Waste Regulations
(Chapter
7)
,
which superceded the Rules and
Regulations
on
July
27,
1973,
These violations allegedly occurred
regularly and continually from July 1970 through the April
1
filinc’
date for the Complaint and involved poor management practices~
It
was charged, for example, that all three sites failed to provide
13—569
p
&nt
th3
V~
J~ ~
t
Ci
9
i
t~JE f~
I
i
~
L
CFt
R~E
I
c
a
s
~i
fOt
e~t
esçor art
ROCKIORD DISP SAL ~~ERJlCE
INC.
p~a~ed S te III for
the Ca
j
fram
Jar ~ary 31,
~O72,
o July 17
19~2
Eespnndent SAHL3TROM
EU DOING PRODUCTS
INC. a~~eea~o this use of
the property.
4.
Since July 1,
1970,
in excess of 72,000 tons per year
of residential refuse,
lumber, demolition material, and industrial
waste
(paper and wood pallets) were deposited on all three Sites
during their
~espective periods of operation
“5.
Respondent, CITY OF ROCKFORD, admits to each and every
violation alleged in the Complaint filed in this action and further
admits to, concedes
and assumes
full and sole responsibility there—
for~ Each aad every allegation of said Complaint is hereby in-
corporated by reference herein~
The Tents of Settlement indicate in relevant portions that
—3—
“8.
.
,
.
This proposed settlement is expressly conditioned
upon, and effective only with approval thereof in all respects by
the Illinois Pollution Control Board.
The
parties further stipulate
that all statements contained herein shall be null, void and of no
effect and shall not be used in any further litigation in the event
that the Board fails to approve the following terms of settlement
in all respects:
“a.
Lt~ndfillor solid waste disposal activities
have been and will continue
to
be permanently
discontinued at all three sites.
“b.
The sites will be covered, contoured,
and
graded
in
conformance with the drawing
attached hereto as Exhibit I titled “Contours”
dated June 25,
1974, not later than October 31,
1974.
“c.
Proof Rolling, corrective grading and seeding of
Sites
I,
II
and
III
will be completed by October
31, 1974,
including ditch work to the proposed
storm sewer along Harrison Avenue.
“ci.
It is contemplated that SAHLSTROM BUILDING
PRODUCTS,
INC., will utilize Sites
II and
III
as
a storage area.
In that regard granular fill
may be placed on the contours above the 140’
elevation to allow access to machinery and equip-
ment stored on the upper plateau of the area.
Access to
the
depression shown as
115
on Exhibit
1 attached
may
be regraded to allow truck traffic
access to an incinerator at this location for the
purpose of ash removal.
Existing slopes on the
southeast quarter of the perimeter and adjacent to
a gravel mixing operation and a well site will be
reduced by October
31,
1974,
by cutting back and
refilling that area.
Road access will be permitted
on the west side of the
well
site.
The City will
provide the Agency with interim reports regarding
each of the activities to be conducted pursuant to
this paragraph.
The reports should be submitted
one month prior to each such undertaking and should
include the beginning date,
the completion date and
a description of the activity to be so conducted.
“e.
Respondent, CITY OF ROCKFORD agrees to pay a
penalty of $15,000 for the violations admitted to
in paragraph
5 above.
Respondent, BROWNING-FERRIS
INDUSTRIES OF ROCKFORD, INC.,
agrees to indemnify
Respondent CITY OF ROCKFORD in the amount of $8,500.
The City in consideration of the aforesaid $8,500
agrees to hold harmless,
save,
and indemnify
Respondent BROWNING-FERRIS
INDUSTRIES OF ROCKFORD,
INC.,
for any expenses or costs of closure or any
cost of compliance with this settlement
as well
as any future expenses which arise due to the
13
—571
this agreement as well as expenses arising from
any other cause.
“fr
No violation or liability is to be
found or
assessed as
to Respondents BROWNING-FERRIS
INDUSTRIES
OF ROCKFORD,
INC., ROCKFORD DISPOSAL
SERVICE,
INC., PAUL N.
SAHLSTROM,
or SAHLSTROM
BUILDING PRODUCTS,
INC.
“g.
The City and Respondent SAHLSTROM BUILDING PRODUCTS,
INC.
agree that all garbage,
debris, and other
materials will be removed from the SAHLSTROM
BUILDING PRODUCTS,
INC. property in the area of
the incinerator referred to in sub-paragraph
(d)
above and disposed of in conformance with the
law by October 31, 1974,”
We accept the Stipulation and Proposal For Settlement entered
into among the parties.
We find that the City of Rockford has
violated the Act and regulations as set out in the Complaint.
We
accept the Settlement for the following reasons.
First, although
violations have been numerous and long—standin
,
illegal operations
have now ceased, and a clean—up program is underway, Second,
no
citizens objected to the Settlement reached by the parties.
in the
absence of comment we can only assume that the public interest is
adequately protected.
Third, the penalty is adequate.
Continuous
and seemingly willful violations over several years might sometimes
warrant a more severe penalty, but the Board tends to be lenient to-
wards municipalities, because taxpayers’
money can be better spent on
pollution control than on penalties.
We note that Respondents City of Rockford and Browning-Ferris
Industries of Rockford,
Inc. agree to indemnify one another as in-
dicated in point e of the Terms of Settlement.
While we approve this
indemnification as part of their agreement,
it should be clear to
the parties that any remedy for breach of this provision lies with
the courts rather than with this Board.
This constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of law
of the Board.
ORDER
IT
IS THE ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that:
1.
Respondent City shall cease and desist from violating
those sections of the Act and regulations established in this
Opinion.
2.
The parties shall carry out the Terms of Settlement
agreed to at the July 25 hearing as set out in full in the signed
Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement received by the Board on
Auqust 7,
1974, and as essentially set out in this Opinion.
13—572
3,
Respondent
City
shall
pay
a
penalty
of
$15,000
for
the
violations
of
the
Act
and
regulations
found
in
this
Opinion.
Pay-
ment
shall be by certified check or money order made payable to
the
State
of
Illinois,
Fiscal
Services
Division,
Environmental
Protection
Aqency,
2200
Churchill
Road,
Springfield,
Illinois
61706,
Payment
shall
be
made
within
35
days
of
the
adoption
of
this
Order.
I,
Christan
L.
3 offett,
Clerk
of
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board,
hefeby
certify
~aat
,the
above
Opinion
and
Order
was
adopted
on
the~
day of~
1974,
by
a
vote
of
~
toQ.
13—573