ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARI)
    September
    12,
    1974
    CITIZENS FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT,
    An Illinois Not-for-Profit Corp.,
    Complainant,
    vs.
    )
    POE 74—19
    INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY,
    Hough Division,
    Respondent.
    Mr. Dennis
    L.
    Adamcyzk appeared for Complainant
    Mr. William A.
    Domm,
    attorney for Respondent
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Dr. Odell)
    Citizens for a Better Environment (CBE) filed a Complaint
    against International Harvester Company (Harvester) on January 14,
    1974. Harvester owns
    and
    operates a facility (the Hough Division)
    in Libertyvilie, Lake County, Illinois. The plant is located ad-
    jacent to RockJ.and Road and the Des Plaines River, CBE alleged
    that:
    1. Respondent discharged wastewater into the Des
    Plaines River from December
    31,
    1972, through
    January 14, 1973, without a permit in violation
    of Rule 903(a) of the Water Pollution Regulations
    of Illinois (Chapter Three)
    2. Respondent did not file operating reports pertain-
    ing
    to effluent discharges from December
    31,
    1972,
    through 3anuary
    14,
    1973, in violation of
    Rule 501
    (a) of Chapter Three.
    3.
    Respondent violated Section 12(a)
    of the
    Environ-
    mental Protection Act (Act) and Rule 403 of Chapter
    Three on the dates of and in the manner set out be-
    low:
    a. Iron from the facility was discharged into
    the Des Plaines River on October 18, 1973;
    and
    b. Oil from the facility was discharged into
    the Des Plaines River on October 18, 1973;
    and
    c. Chromium (hexavalent) from the facility was
    discharged into the Des Plaines River on
    October 18, 1973; and
    13
    561

    coo ii.
    ~r n
    t
    Ia ~
    as
    char~e~
    it
    ~.
    Je ~ n
    ~ver
    n
    L’cv~r
    at I
    ec~o a
    Ii~ C
    m
    ~n
    ~O
    r~
    ~
    t
    e~ h~t
    n
    0oar
    13
    am
    ot ~et
    ~i cc
    r
    ~et am
    t ~s
    .pl
    c
    idar to cair Au
    e
    c r~a~
    r
    ~
    ~
    0 ard
    ted th L
    ~d 0au
    -E
    ~ ~either
    i
    o
    o
    ~
    C a d uav~ amo a t ~0 aadi~
    i
    ral
    r a ~epan
    Ii
    ~
    ~nous
    on
    Octal
    25
    4
    cOot irs artered a Sbipu1a~ion in’~o the record which
    the
    Boart received on May 13 Paragraph 10 of the Stipulation
    stated ti- t a ~1 00 penaLty was to be paid to the Otate
    Of
    Il irois ~or rater pollution control research. In our Interim
    Order of o ne 20, we remanded the case to the parties for further
    proceedings. We indicated that one Board lacked ~he power to
    authorize payments for water pollution control research. We re-
    quested the parties to amend the Stipulation to provide that any
    agreed upon penalty be payable to the general revenue of the
    Sba4-e of Illinois. The parties submitted an Amendment To The
    otirulation on July 15, ~974, iudicating that Respondent would
    rake
    ‘a
    donation to
    the
    College
    of
    Lake County
    an
    Grayslake,
    Illinois n the amount of $1,000,”
    The other portions of the original Ctipulation remained
    uncharged In p~rtonentpare the May 13 Stipulation stated
    that:
    ‘1 International Harvester Company admits that it
    13ad not obtained, subsequent to June 30, 1973,
    a permit for its discharge of non—contact cool-
    ing water pursuant to one Illinois Pollution
    Control Regulations.
    “2. international Harvester Company admits that on
    October 18, 1973, it discharged iron, oil and
    hexavalent chromium into the Des Plaines River,
    and that on November 8, 1973, it discharged
    chromium into the Des Plaines River,
    International Harvester admits that the discharges
    listed in this paragraph 2 exceeded Section 12(a)
    of the Act and Section 403 of the
    Water Pollution
    Control Regulations.”
    As part of its compliance program included in the Stipulation,
    Harvester
    agreed to locate industrial wastes flowing into the Des
    Plaines River and divert such wastes to its new treatment plant,
    continue sampling surveillance, cease and desist from all violations,
    send final sampling reports to the Board, and advise the Environ-
    mental Protection Agency (EPA) of any accidental spills.
    Finally, in the Amendment To The Stipulation received on
    13
    562

    34
    U. u ira! a
    r~
    i
    at ad S tU.u Iacamr~y
    bU. r a chrugirg rho
    t~
    a
    I
    ~e~er
    ~
    ~.m cc cc the
    ei~
    s en s coo rts wer’~ rot plate ne tespondert
    am h~ed ti amed
    ty
    ii
    2
    ~—
    I
    Sa~ u~c1istria
    isLe” from t e pair~too tis, tart ~asher tam earamn~ 0 22’
    rd oi~rgtowers ~o’tiriuedtc e ii”’~arged into Sic Des ?~a as
    9~ve~Se LU. th~ ~ cv na3
    ~i~t
    am
    I th
    iraustr~
    astec
    o the t ru ~
    A—
    6 but in fact
    1~is has noS
    r
    e basis
    I h~ ad:
    ~onq U. ReLpordent
    a md ttiat
    act am U.
    L ‘the t auth le- 303 a and 403 oc Chao~er
    three have beers
    vi
    lated. We f ni ro iolatior, U. A La 501 a
    ‘~
    ause no am’ dence as amour ttad on th s pci t
    ~oations of
    Sion 12 ~camr-ed
    ~
    ~r U.
    amJ
    3’o-am~beu
    LO
    3 Hu~e
    9 (a) is a continuing violat’ n since June 30,
    L9~3
    in thaS
    Rampondent has no EPA permit to operate ~ts treatment works. Ruae
    403 was violated Li the sane uranner and on the same dates as
    Section 12(a) of the Act, namely, October 18 and November 8, 19~3
    We accept the Stipulation entered into between the parties
    in this case. Respondent has shown good faith in his efforts to
    solve his pollution problems. Acceptance of the Stipulation will
    result in immediate pollution abatement efforts. The environmental
    consequences do not appear serious, The parties have dealt at arms-
    length in reaching a solution to the problem. It is also relevant
    that no citizens raised any objection to this Stipulation during
    the hearing.
    We believe that a $1,000.00 penalty is a reasonable one,
    However, the payment of a penalty to an entity such as the College
    of Lake County does not conform with the intent of the Act. Since
    the Stipulation was not made conditional upon complete and unaltered
    acceptance by the Board, and since the parties failed to carry out
    our June 20 directive, we unilaterally modify the Stipulation so

    —4—
    that the penalty is
    payable to the general revenue of the State of
    Illinois. This constitutes the
    findings of
    fact
    and conclusions
    of law of the
    Board.
    ORDER
    IT IS THE ORDER of
    the
    Pollution Control Board that:
    1. International Harvester Company shall sample various
    drains, manholes, and storm sewers as related to
    its
    industrial
    wastes
    from its industrial processes at its Libertyville facility
    in an effort
    to trace and identify the source or sources of any
    industrial wastes which may be entering into the storm sewer system.
    Initial sampling must he begun within 30 days after the adoption of
    this Order.
    2. International Harvester Company shall establish and
    implement a plan to connect all such industrial wastes that it
    discovers, pursuant
    to
    Order
    1
    above, to its new central water
    tteatment plant. International Harvester Company must furnish a
    copy of the plan
    to
    Citizens For A Better Environment, attention
    Mr. Adamczyk. If no industrial wastes are discovered, pursuant to
    Order
    1 above, International Harvester Company
    will
    furnish a
    letter
    to the Citizens For A Better Environment, attention Mr.
    Adamczyk, statino that fact.
    3. International Harvester
    Company
    shall
    carry
    out
    an
    on—going sampling program to monitor the effects
    of any
    changes
    made pursuant
    to
    Order 2 above.
    4, International Harvester Company
    shall
    furnish to the
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency a copy of the
    final
    sampling report which shows no industrial wastes going into the
    storm sewers. If
    a
    final
    sampling report is unavailable
    within
    6 months of the adoption of this
    Order, International Harvester
    Company shall furnish
    a progress report by
    that date and there-
    if
    tar every 6 months until
    the
    final sampling report is available
    showing no industrial waste discharge into the storm sewer.
    Copies
    of these reports shall also be furnished by Respondent. to the
    Citizens For A Better Environment, attention Mr. Adamczyk.
    5. international Harvester Company shall apply for any
    permits that
    are required pursuant
    to the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board regulations.
    6. International Harvester Company shall cease and desist
    from violating Section 12(a) of the Act and Rules 403
    and
    903(a)
    of Chapter Three.
    7.
    International
    Harvester Company shall advise the
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency of any accidental spills
    of
    industrial
    wastes
    into its storm sewers until December
    31, 1975,
    8.
    International Harvester Company shall pay a penalty of
    13— 564

    SI
    ,
    000 ~00 for
    the violations of the Act
    and reulations found in
    this Opinion.
    Payment shall be by certified check or money order
    made payable to the State of Illinois,
    FIscaL Services Division,
    Environmental Protection Agency, 2200 Churchill Road, Springfield,
    Illinoi.s 62706. Payment shall be made within 30 days of the adop-
    tion of this
    Order.
    I, Christen U Moffett, C1erJ~ of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify tL~at~)the above Opinion and Order w~s adopted
    on the /~‘~ day ~
    1974, by a vote of r~ So
    13—565

    Back to top