1. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
      2. BOUGHTON’S ARGUMENTS
      3. DISCUSSION

ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
February 20, 2003
 
GINA PATTERMANN, LISA COLLINS, and
DEEN COLLINS,
 
Complainants,
 
v.
 
BOUGHTON TRUCKING AND
MATERIALS, INC.,
 
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
 
 
 
 
 
PCB 99-187
(Citizens Enforcement - Noise, Air)
 
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by N. J. Melas):
On January 24, 2003, Boughton Trucking and Materials, Inc., (Boughton) filed a motion
to dismiss complainants Lisa Collins and Deen Collins (Collinses) from this matter (mot.). The
Collinses filed this citizens’ enforcement complaint against Boughton on June 17, 1999 alleging
noise and air pollution violations.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Of the three named complainants, only Gina Patterman signed the original June 17, 1999
complaint. On July 22, 1999, the Board granted the Collinses time to file an amended complaint
signed by each complainant either personally or through an attorney. On August 13, 1999, the
Collinses filed an amended complaint signed by all three named complainants.
1
Subsequent to
that date, complainants Lisa and Deen Collins have signed only two additional filings, a motion
for leave to file a late response to Boughton’s motion to dismiss dated August 18, 1999, and the
response to Boughton’s motion to dismiss dated September 21, 1999. Attorney Steven Kaiser
made an appearance on behalf of only Gina Patterman on October 23, 2001.
2
To date, neither of
the Collinses have appeared in this proceeding either
 
personally
 
or through an attorney. The
Collinses did not respond to the motion to dismiss.
BOUGHTON’S ARGUMENTS
Boughton argues that the Board should not allow Lisa and Deen Collins to participate in
this proceeding after they have failed to appear or otherwise pursue their allegations since
September 21, 1999. Correspondence sent by Boughton to Lisa and Deen Collins has been
returned as undeliverable and without a forwarding address. In particular, the Collinses did not
responded to a first set of interrogatories and document requests Boughton sent them via first
1
This is contrary to Boughton’s motion to dismiss that contends the Collinses “have never
signed any documents in this proceeding.” Mot. at 1.
 
2
Steven Kaiser withdrew as counsel for Gina Patterman on August 2, 2002.

 
2
class U.S. mail and UPS delivery on June 22, 2001. Boughton also alleges that Lisa and Deen
Collins have not participated in any of the approximately fifteen status conferences scheduled in
this matter. Boughton contends allowing the Collinses to participate will unduly prejudice
Boughton by delaying the proceeding and causing Boughton to incur additional costs in
defending itself. Consequently, Boughton requests the Board to dismiss the Collinses due to
their failure to respond to discovery, appear at status conference calls, or otherwise participate in
this proceeding.
DISCUSSION
The Board has previously determined that representation of other parties before the
Board is the practice of law and, therefore, only an attorney may represent another party before
the Board.
See
 
In re
Petition of Recycle Technologies, AS 97-9, slip op. at 4 (July 10, 1997);
Graf v. Valiquet, Inc., PCB 99-125, slip op. at 3 (Apr. 15, 1999). Because Gina Patterman does
not appear to be an attorney, she may not represent the Collinses in this matter.
Failure to appear in a Board proceeding is grounds for dismissal of a complainant. Smith
v. Heritage Tool & Die Manufacturing, Inc., PCB 99-145, slip op. at 3 (June 3, 1999); Doruff
et
al
. v. Bloomingdale Elementary School Dist., PCB 93-204 (Jan. 6, 1994). The Collinses have
not signed any documents nor otherwise appeared in this proceeding since September 21, 1999,
and have not responded to any discovery. The Board finds that the Collinses lack of prosecution
in this matter will unduly prejudice Boughton and delay this proceeding should they be allowed
to remain complainants. The Board dismisses complainants Lisa and Deen Collins pursuant to
precedent and Board procedural rules.
Accordingly, the Board directs the Clerk of the Board to amend the caption in this matter
to reflect Gina Patterman as the sole complainant.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that the Board
adopted the above order on February 20, 2003, by a vote of 7-0.
 
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
 
 
 
 

Back to top