1. ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
      2. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
      3. Complainant,
      4. PCB 74—79Respondent.
      5. Petitioner,
      6. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
      7. Rules.
      8. ORDER

ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
May
23,
1974
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Complainant,
vs.
)
SCM CORPORATION~ a New York
)
corporation, Glidden-Durkee Division
)
PCB 74—79
Respondent.
GLIDDEN-DURKEE,
a division of SCM
)
Cornotation,
Petitioner,
vs.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Responhent.
Marvin
Benn,
Assistant
Attorney
General
for
the
EPA
Joseph
S.
Wright,
Jr.,
~ttorney
for
Glidden—Durkee
ORDER
OF
TEE
BOARD
(by
Mr.
Henss)
The
Environmental
Protection Agency filed its Complaint
against Respondent SCM Corporaticn, Glidden-Durkee Division,
allegino that the Company had operated its manufacturing
facility
in
Chicago
without first obtaining operating permits
from
the
Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency.
It is
alleged
that
this
constitutes a violation of Rule 103(b)
(2)
of
Chapter
2,
Part
I of the Air Regulations and a violation
of
Section
9(b)
of
the
Environmental Protection Act.
Respondent then filed a Cross Petition for Review of Permit
Denial.
In
its
Petition Respondent alleged that it had submitted
and resubmitted applications for operating permits for all
emission
soorces
within the plant and that all of the applications
show
that
the facilities
at
the plant are in compliance with
relevant Rules and Regulations.
The Company alleges that the
EPA
wrongfully
denied the operating permits.
12~—391

—2—
The Agency now moves to dismiss
its Complaint.
In support
of the Motion for Dismissal the Agency states that it has
decided to grant the permits
in question since it now believes
Respondent has not caused air pollution at its facility.
The
Agency states that with the decision to
grant the permit,
the
case is moot.
We
shall allow the Motion and Dismiss the Complaint and
Cross Petition as moot.
In any event
we
should have dismissed
the Cross Petition since
it did not comply with our Procedural
Rules.
ORDER
It is Ordered that the Complaint and Cross Petition be
dismissed without prejudice.
I,
Christan L. Moffett,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify the above Order was adopted this
~
day of
__________,
1974 by a vote of
..S
toP~
.
12—
392

Back to top