111 ~LVIEW FARMS,
    1
    Petiti
    er
    ENVIRONMENmAL PROPE
    PT~
    ~f~J
    ~1espudent
    ~n July ~5
    1
    74
    Fil a~ew~rms
    bc
    pursuar
    Section 40 of
    ti-a
    ~r‘ironmertal
    r tactioi Ae~ Act
    ett-i
    ed
    ~he P lluLoo Ccrtrol
    H aid
    noamd
    for
    ~ raw of
    e Lnv~r
    ~enta
    r ~ection
    a ic”
    1gaic~
    Je
    c~l
    f
    C
    O~6
    itiro
    Jn
    July
    30
    13
    4
    ~he iceic; moved
    flat Je pa nit
    pp ~ca-
    tion
    I Petittoner
    now a oart
    I ~he ~e~ord
    ~.
    EPAvM~i-u.
    PCB
    3-109
    oe
    rade
    i
    part
    it
    this pro~eein~.
    ‘he ame a
    ass
    roved
    hat the °eutior for Revtew
    f Htl ‘~amFairs
    In~,be
    r
    ~is~ed for lick of ~pecit~ci~
    r that
    ~et_tione
    mend
    hi-
    ~etit~on to give ~esuondent sutr~ien notice to mr~pare
    it~
    defense
    9e crant Resporfent
    s Motsor
    o lr~rporate Permit Appltca-
    ti n aid order Pet :ioner to fife an amended Petition Far Permit
    Review.
    Petitioner
    s permit application, nresently with the
    record of EPAv
    May ~il
    PCB
    3-103,
    i~
    rncorpara~ed
    ii
    Lo thi~
    cause to the extent mat
    it can
    e obtaine
    from Appeliate ~o4rt
    PIso
    Petitioner
    is ordered to amend his PetiLion For Fermt Review
    ard pleac facts surficiently definite for Respordent to prepare its
    defense.
    NhilL
    ~e have no inclination to tell Petitioner how to
    plead under Illinois law
    it should be clear that Respondent
    s
    ertitled to kno~what particular factual or ~ega~ issues regarding
    the permit denial are to be raised at the hearing
    For example
    concerning the letter of permit denial of June 24, 1974, what
    factual conclusion
    of the Agency does the Petitioner deny or intend
    to refute.
    If Petitioner admits all of Respondent~sconclusions of fact,
    it must indicate the questions of law it will submit to the hear-
    ing officer in its brief at the
    hearing.
    Respondent has 10 days
    after the hearing to respond to Petitioner~sarguments.
    Hillview Farms,
    Inc. shall amend its petition
    within
    35
    days of the adoption
    of this
    Order or
    be dismissed for failure to
    state a cause of action.
    Petitioner~sright to amend his Petition
    For Permit Review is conditional on
    his
    waiving for an additional
    90 days the requirements
    of
    final Board action under Section
    40 of
    the Act.
    13
    337

    IT
    IS
    SO
    ORDERED.
    I. Christan L. Moffett~Clerk
    of
    the Illinois Pollution Control
    Boards
    hereby
    certify~
    that
    the
    above
    Order
    was
    adopted
    on
    the
    ~
    day
    of
    1934,
    by
    a vote of
    ~
    to
    j~.
    (1
    ~of~
    13
    338

    Back to top