ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    January 23, 1975
    MASONITE CORPORATION,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 74—365
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent,
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Dumelle):
    Masonite Corporation (Masonite) filed a variance petition
    on October 10, 1974 which sought an extension of a previously
    granted variance from the fluoride effluent standard found
    in Rule 408(a) of the Water Pollution Regulations. The
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency) filed a
    recommendation to grant the requested variance on November
    18, 1974. A hearing was held on December 3, 1974.
    Masonite operates the Illinois Research and Development
    Center located in St. Charles. At this research center,
    Masonite carries out limited electroplating operations which
    utilize hydrofluoric acid. Masonite has spent approximately
    $200,000 in an attempt to bring its industrial discharge
    into compliance with both the nickel and fluoride effluent
    limitations found in the Water Pollution Regulations.
    Masonite operates an industrial waste treatment system which
    reduces the nickel concentrations to acceptable limits and
    reduces fluoride levels to approximately 8 to 18 mg/l. The
    effluent from this industrial waste facility is combined
    with domestic waste. This combined waste stream is then
    treated in an activated sewage treatment facility. This
    activated waste treatment facility was supposed to achieve
    a fluoride effluent within the 2.5 mg/l prescribed level of
    Rule 408 (a). However, this discharge averages approximately
    6.5 mg/i of fluoride. For this reason Masonite has requested
    the present variance.
    Masonite discharges into Kress Creek, which is a tributary
    to the west branch of the Des Plaines River. Because of
    discharges from Owens—Illinois plant, located adjacent to
    Masonite, Kress Creek presently affords a minimum of 60 to 1
    dilution, The fluoride concentration present downstream
    from Masonite’s discharge averages 0.2 ppm. The Agency
    calculates if a dilution of only 20 to 1 were present
    15— 311

    that Masonite’s effluent would not cause the fluoride level
    in the stream to exceed 1.0 ppm. For this reason, the
    Agency agrees with petitioner that Masonite’s discharge
    presents a minimal environmental impact.
    Masonite was granted a six month variance in the prior
    variance proceeding to enable Masonite to examine additional
    methods of achieving compliance with Rule 408(a) with respect
    to fluoride (Masonite
    v.
    EPA, PCB 74-211, 13 PCB
    229
    (July
    25, 1974)). Since the granting of the previous variance,
    Masonite has spent approximately $12,000 examining methods
    of achieving compliance with the existing fluoride effluent
    limitations. This has consisted of literature research
    reviews and both bench and pilot scale testing of various
    treatment systems. Masonite alleges that their research has
    indicated that the use of activated alumina is currently the
    most promising method to reduce their fluoride discharges.
    Masonite alleges that there does not exist technology at
    present which would achieve compliance with the 2.5 mg/i
    effluent limitation. For this reason Masonite requests an
    extension of the previously granted variance while it continues
    testing of the activated alumina program and additional
    ~Literature research. The Agency agrees with Masonite and
    tecommends the grant of the requested relief.
    Both Masonite and the Agency refer to the pending
    regulatory proceeding before the Board which proposes a
    modification of both the water quality and effluent standard
    for fluoride, R 73-15. On January 16, 1975 the Board authorized
    for publication and final comment an amendment to Rule
    408(a) which would set a new maximum effluent limitation of
    15 mg/l for fluoride. However, the existing effluent standard
    for fluoride is 2.5 mg/i. Because of the minimal impact of
    Masonite’s discharge and the pendency of the proposed amendment
    to Rule 408(a) the Board has decided to grant an extension
    of the previously granted variance.
    This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact
    and conclusions of law.
    ORDER
    The Pollution Control Board hereby grants Masonite
    Corporation a variance from Rule 408(a) of the Water Pollution
    Regulations until January 23, 1976 or until the Board’s pending
    amendment of Rule 408(a) is enacted, whichever occur earlier,
    subject to the following conditions:
    15—312

    1. Masonite’s discharge shall not exceed a maximum of
    12 mg/i of fluoride~unlessa greater number is adopted by the
    Board in R73-l5.
    2. Masonite shall submit monthly progress reports to
    the Environmental Protection Agency stating its efforts and
    results in limiting fluoride discharges.
    IT IS SO ORDERED,
    I, Christan L, Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order
    were adopted on the
    ~
    day of January, 1975 by a vote of
    Christan L. Moffett, erk
    Illinois Pollution trol Board

    Back to top