ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January 23, 1975
ELMHURST COUNTRY CLUB,
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 74—354
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent,
Mr. Lawrence
X.
Pusateri, appeared on behalf of Petitioner;
Mr. John T. Bernbom, appeared on behalf of Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr. Dumelle):
Petitioner filed a petition for variance on September
30,
1974.
On October 11,
1974,
the Board required petitioner
to submit an amended petition for variance stating the
specific rule or regulation from which a variance was requested.
On October 28, 1974 petitioner amended its variance petition
specifically requesting a variance from Rule 404(a)
of the
Water Pollution Regulations.
OnNovember 25,
1974 the
Environmental Protection Agency (Agency)
filed its recommendation
to deny the variance request.
No hearing was held.
Petitioner owns and operates the Elmhurst Country Club,
consisting of an 18—hole golf course with a clubhouse containing
a lounge and restaurant.
The Country Club is open seven
days per week.
Approximately 12,000 gallons per day of
sewage are produced at the Country Club.
Petitioner has an
existing extended aeration treatment facility.
The sewage
treatment plant was designed to treat 15,000 gallons per
day.
The effluent from petitioner’s sewage treatment plant
is discharged to Salt Creek.
Petitioner must meet the
effluent standard of 30 mg/i BOD and 37 mg/i of suspended
solids found in Rule 404(a)
of the Water Pollution Regulations.
Petitioner alleges that it is engaged in negotiations
with the Village of Addison preparatory to diversion of its
wastewater to the Village of Addison sewage treatment system
and the subsequent abandonment of petitioner’s sewage treatment
plant.
Petitioner is also investigating the possibility of
modifying its treatment plant in order to comply with Rule
15 —307
—2—
404(a)
in the event that petitioner does not divert its
wastewaters to the Village of Addison.
Petitioner alleges
that compliance with Rule 404(a) would require an expenditure
of approximately $100,000, which would be totally lost
should it elect
to divert flows to the Village of Addison
sometime in the future.
Petitioner further alleges that the
injury
to the public would be minimal because of dilution
present in Salt Creek.
The
Agency stated that it conducted an investigation of
petitioner’s sewage treatment plant on October 24, 1974 and
found that the facilities were “completely out of service
and it appeared that they had been out of service for some
time’. The Agency characterized petitioner’s effluent as
“murky grey and septic”.
In addition,
petitioner has been
without a treatment plant operator for the past year.
The Board finds that a petitioner who seeks
a variance
should be exhibiting good faith.
At a minimum, this
means that the Country Club should operate its sewage
treatment plant to obtain the best effluent possible.
It has disregarded its obligations.
For this reason,
the
Board has decided to deny petitioner’s request.
This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
conclusions of law.
ORDER
Petitioner’s request for a variance from Rule 404(a)
of
the Water Pollution Regulations is hereby denied without
prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were
adopted on the ~Z~’~°
day of January,
1975 by a vote of
~/-~
()____
Christari L. Mo~fett,
k
Illinois Pollution Co
01 Board
15 —308