ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    January 23,
    1975
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Complainant,
    v.
    )
    PCB
    74—292
    FRANK
    L.
    WHITE AND DAVID
    L. WHITE,
    both individually and d/b/a WHITE
    BROTHERS EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC.,
    a/k/a WHITE BROTHERS EQUIPMENT
    COMPANY,. ELK COAL COMPANY or
    CENTRAL STATES MINING COMPANY,
    INC.,
    Respondents,
    Mr. Larry
    R.
    Eaton, attorney for Complainant.
    Mr. James W.
    Sanders, attorney for Respondents.
    OPINION
    AND
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Dr.
    Odell)
    On August
    7,
    1974,
    the Environmental Protection Agency
    (Agency)
    filed a Complaint against the Respondents with the
    Pollution Control Board
    (Board).
    The Complaint alleged that
    from May 23, 1972,
    through August
    7,
    1974, Respondents violated
    various sections of the Environmental Protection Act
    (Act)
    and
    Illinois Mine Waste Regulations
    (Chapter Four)
    in carrying out
    strip mining operations at
    a facility
    (Elk Mine
    #1)
    located in
    the NW 1/4, Section
    17, Township 7 South, Range
    1
    West of the
    Third Principal Meridian, northwest of Elkville in Jackson
    County,
    Illinois.
    Specifically the Complaint charged that:
    1.
    From November 23,
    1972,
    through August
    7,
    1974,
    Respondents conducted their coal operation in a manner that
    allowed discharges of inadequately treated industrial wastes
    to drain into numerous open fields, and small, unnamed lakes
    in violation of Section 12(a)
    of the Act.
    The wastes contain
    excessive amounts of iron, manganese, sulfate, and acidic
    chemicals.
    2.
    From November 23,
    1972,
    through August 7,
    1974,
    Respondents operated their facility without an Agency permit
    in violation of Section 12(b)
    of the Act and Rule 201 of Chapter
    Four.
    3.
    From May 23,
    1972,
    through August
    7,
    1974, Respondents
    allowed mine waste effluent containing excessive settleable
    solids and obvious levels of color to drain from
    Elk
    Mine #1
    in violation of Rule 605(b)
    of Chapter Four,
    15
    299

    4.
    From May 23,
    1972,
    through August 7,
    1974,
    Respondents caused or allowed mine waste effluent containing
    iron contaminants exceeding
    7
    mg/i and effluent whose total
    acidity exceeded its total alkalinity to drain from thsir
    facility in violation of Rule 606(a)
    of Chapter Four,
    A hearing was held at Carbondale on Friday, November
    8,
    1974,
    at which time a Stipulation was entered into evidence.
    ~7e
    nd that the Stipulation establishes that:
    1.
    From November 23,
    1972,
    until August 7,
    1974,
    Respondents operated their facility without
    a permit in violation
    of Section 12(b)
    of the Act and Rule 201 of Chapter Four.
    2.
    On May 2,
    1973, and February 7,
    1974, waste water
    effluent discharged from Respondents~mine contained settleable
    solids and color levels in excess of the standards of Rule 605
    (b), all in violation of Section 12(a)
    of the Act and Rule 605(b)
    of Chapter Four.
    3.
    On May 21,
    1973, and February
    7,
    1974,
    test results
    showed iron concentrations of
    86 mg/l and 130 mg/i.
    The standard
    under Rule 606(a)
    is
    7 mg/i.
    This establishes a violation of
    Section 12(a)
    of the Act and Rule 606(a)
    of Chapter Four for those
    two test dates.
    4.
    On May 21,
    1973,
    and February
    7,
    1974,
    test results
    establish that total acid was in excess of total alkalinity in
    violation of Section 12(a)
    of the Act and Rule 606(a)
    of Chapter
    Four.
    5.
    On February 7,
    1974,
    test results show that waste
    water effluent was measured at pH 3.3 and pH 3.9, both of which
    go beyond the limit of pH 5.0 set out in Rule 606(a).
    This data
    establish
    a violation of Section 12(a)
    of the Act and Rule 606(a)
    for this date.
    The Stipulation indicated that the Respondents had submitted
    a permit application to the Agency on October 25, 1974;
    the Agency
    has not yet acted on the application.
    Respondents agreed in the
    Stipulation to discontinue all mine waste discharges until they
    could be carried out in conformance with the Act and regulations.
    The proposed Order required Respondents to immediately cease and
    desist from all violations, post a performance bond, and pay a
    penalty of $1,500.
    No members of the public objected to the Stipulation at
    the time of the hearing.
    15
    —300

    —3—
    We accept the Stipulation agreed upon by the parties.
    The Stipulation provides for immediate cessation, of environmental
    damage.
    The penalty and the immediate mandatory compliance re-
    quirements provide sufficient deterrence to others to dissuade
    them from violating the Act.
    Finally, where the parties have
    dealt at arms length and reached
    a settlement, we are reluctant
    to disturb it unless we
    find that the public interest has not
    been sufficiently protected,
    This Stipulation represents a
    satisfactory resolution to the long-standing violations
    in this
    case.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
    of law of the Board.
    ORDER
    IT
    IS THE ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that:
    1.
    Respondents immediately cease and desist from violating
    Sections 12(a)
    and
    (b)
    of the Act and Rules 201,
    605(b), and 606(a)
    of Chapter Four.
    2.
    Respondents immediately cease all mining activities at
    the mining site
    (Elk Mine #1)
    until proper permits are procured
    from the Agency for the said operations.
    3.
    Respondents immediately cease discharging mine waste
    water from their premises while such discharges violate the Act
    and Chapter Four.
    4.
    Respondents post within
    30 days of the adoption of
    this Order
    a performance bond in the amount of $10,000 in
    a form
    satisfactory to the Agency.
    Such bond is necessary to assure full
    compliance with this Order; the bond shall terminate upon com-
    pletion of compliance activities, and notification from the Agency
    to the Board of such compliance.
    5.
    Respondents, jointly and severally liable, shall pay
    within 30 days of the adoption of this Order
    a monetary penalty
    of $1,500.00 for the violations found in the Opinion.
    The check
    or money order shall be payable to the State of Illinois, and
    addressed to the Environmental Protection Agency, Fiscal Services
    Section, 2200 Churchill Road,
    Springfield, Illinois 62706.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, herebj certify that the above Opinion and Order was adopted
    on the
    ~
    day of
    .
    ,
    1975,
    by a vote of
    ~
    to
    Christan L.~jfett
    15—301

    Back to top