ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January 23,
1975
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Complainant,
v.
)
PCB
74—292
FRANK
L.
WHITE AND DAVID
L. WHITE,
both individually and d/b/a WHITE
BROTHERS EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC.,
a/k/a WHITE BROTHERS EQUIPMENT
COMPANY,. ELK COAL COMPANY or
CENTRAL STATES MINING COMPANY,
INC.,
Respondents,
Mr. Larry
R.
Eaton, attorney for Complainant.
Mr. James W.
Sanders, attorney for Respondents.
OPINION
AND
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Dr.
Odell)
On August
7,
1974,
the Environmental Protection Agency
(Agency)
filed a Complaint against the Respondents with the
Pollution Control Board
(Board).
The Complaint alleged that
from May 23, 1972,
through August
7,
1974, Respondents violated
various sections of the Environmental Protection Act
(Act)
and
Illinois Mine Waste Regulations
(Chapter Four)
in carrying out
strip mining operations at
a facility
(Elk Mine
#1)
located in
the NW 1/4, Section
17, Township 7 South, Range
1
West of the
Third Principal Meridian, northwest of Elkville in Jackson
County,
Illinois.
Specifically the Complaint charged that:
1.
From November 23,
1972,
through August
7,
1974,
Respondents conducted their coal operation in a manner that
allowed discharges of inadequately treated industrial wastes
to drain into numerous open fields, and small, unnamed lakes
in violation of Section 12(a)
of the Act.
The wastes contain
excessive amounts of iron, manganese, sulfate, and acidic
chemicals.
2.
From November 23,
1972,
through August 7,
1974,
Respondents operated their facility without an Agency permit
in violation of Section 12(b)
of the Act and Rule 201 of Chapter
Four.
3.
From May 23,
1972,
through August
7,
1974, Respondents
allowed mine waste effluent containing excessive settleable
solids and obvious levels of color to drain from
Elk
Mine #1
in violation of Rule 605(b)
of Chapter Four,
15
—
299
4.
From May 23,
1972,
through August 7,
1974,
Respondents caused or allowed mine waste effluent containing
iron contaminants exceeding
7
mg/i and effluent whose total
acidity exceeded its total alkalinity to drain from thsir
facility in violation of Rule 606(a)
of Chapter Four,
A hearing was held at Carbondale on Friday, November
8,
1974,
at which time a Stipulation was entered into evidence.
~7e
nd that the Stipulation establishes that:
1.
From November 23,
1972,
until August 7,
1974,
Respondents operated their facility without
a permit in violation
of Section 12(b)
of the Act and Rule 201 of Chapter Four.
2.
On May 2,
1973, and February 7,
1974, waste water
effluent discharged from Respondents~mine contained settleable
solids and color levels in excess of the standards of Rule 605
(b), all in violation of Section 12(a)
of the Act and Rule 605(b)
of Chapter Four.
3.
On May 21,
1973, and February
7,
1974,
test results
showed iron concentrations of
86 mg/l and 130 mg/i.
The standard
under Rule 606(a)
is
7 mg/i.
This establishes a violation of
Section 12(a)
of the Act and Rule 606(a)
of Chapter Four for those
two test dates.
4.
On May 21,
1973,
and February
7,
1974,
test results
establish that total acid was in excess of total alkalinity in
violation of Section 12(a)
of the Act and Rule 606(a)
of Chapter
Four.
5.
On February 7,
1974,
test results show that waste
water effluent was measured at pH 3.3 and pH 3.9, both of which
go beyond the limit of pH 5.0 set out in Rule 606(a).
This data
establish
a violation of Section 12(a)
of the Act and Rule 606(a)
for this date.
The Stipulation indicated that the Respondents had submitted
a permit application to the Agency on October 25, 1974;
the Agency
has not yet acted on the application.
Respondents agreed in the
Stipulation to discontinue all mine waste discharges until they
could be carried out in conformance with the Act and regulations.
The proposed Order required Respondents to immediately cease and
desist from all violations, post a performance bond, and pay a
penalty of $1,500.
No members of the public objected to the Stipulation at
the time of the hearing.
15
—300
—3—
We accept the Stipulation agreed upon by the parties.
The Stipulation provides for immediate cessation, of environmental
damage.
The penalty and the immediate mandatory compliance re-
quirements provide sufficient deterrence to others to dissuade
them from violating the Act.
Finally, where the parties have
dealt at arms length and reached
a settlement, we are reluctant
to disturb it unless we
find that the public interest has not
been sufficiently protected,
This Stipulation represents a
satisfactory resolution to the long-standing violations
in this
case.
This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
of law of the Board.
ORDER
IT
IS THE ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that:
1.
Respondents immediately cease and desist from violating
Sections 12(a)
and
(b)
of the Act and Rules 201,
605(b), and 606(a)
of Chapter Four.
2.
Respondents immediately cease all mining activities at
the mining site
(Elk Mine #1)
until proper permits are procured
from the Agency for the said operations.
3.
Respondents immediately cease discharging mine waste
water from their premises while such discharges violate the Act
and Chapter Four.
4.
Respondents post within
30 days of the adoption of
this Order
a performance bond in the amount of $10,000 in
a form
satisfactory to the Agency.
Such bond is necessary to assure full
compliance with this Order; the bond shall terminate upon com-
pletion of compliance activities, and notification from the Agency
to the Board of such compliance.
5.
Respondents, jointly and severally liable, shall pay
within 30 days of the adoption of this Order
a monetary penalty
of $1,500.00 for the violations found in the Opinion.
The check
or money order shall be payable to the State of Illinois, and
addressed to the Environmental Protection Agency, Fiscal Services
Section, 2200 Churchill Road,
Springfield, Illinois 62706.
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, herebj certify that the above Opinion and Order was adopted
on the
~
day of
.
,
1975,
by a vote of
~
to
Christan L.~jfett
15—301