ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January 16,
1975
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY,
)
Complainant,
)
)
v.
)
PCB 74-399
~LPH HAVENS and CARL HAVENS,
)
d/bJa
HAVENS DISPOSAL,
)
Respondent.
)
OPINION AND ORDER of the Board
(by Mr.
Zeitlin)
This case concerns the operation
ofa
solid waste management site by
respondents
in Fulton
County,
Illinois.
The complaint,
filed by the En-
vironmental
Protection Agency (Agency)
on October 24,
1974, alleges that
this site has been operated without
an operating license since July 27,
1974,
in violation of Section
21
(e) of
the Environmental
Protection
Act
(Act), and Rule 202 (b)(1)
Chapter 7 of the Board’s Solid Waste Rules and
Regulations.
Chapter
7 became effective on July 27,
1973.
Rule 202 (b)(1) under
it requires that existing solid waste management sites obtain an Agency
operating permit not later than one year after the effective date of
the
Regulation.
Section
21
(e) of the Act states
that “no person shall
conduct
any..
.
refuse disposal operations.
.
.without a permit granted by the Agency...”
Pursuant to the Board’s
Procedural
Rule 314 (a),
the Agency served
on
Respondents
a Request for Admissions
(Complainant’s exhibit 1).
That
request not being answered,
the requested admissions of fact were admitted
by the Respondents
by operation of Procedural
Rule 314 (c),
Admission in
the Absence of Denial.
The facts contained in that Request for Admissions
can be summarized
as follows:
1)
Respondents had no Agency operating permit between July 27,
1974
and October 24,
1974.
2)
Respondents did,
in
fact, operate the site in question
on August
12,
1974.
3)
Respondents operated the site for two or more days a week between
July 28,
1974 and October 9,
1974.
15—
259
At
a hearing in
the matter on
December 10,
1974,
the parties jointly
entered
a Stipulation
and
Proposed
Settlement.
The
Stipulation
sets out
basically the facts described above,
and
makes
reference to
the
admissions.
The Stipulation also contains statements
to the effect that the Agency
acknowleges certain undisclosed efforts
to obtain
a license
by Respondents
which, although insufficient, indicated goQd faith on
the part of Respon~
dents.
The Agency also noted that Respondents had cooperated fully
in the
investigations
in this matter.
For these reasons,
the proposal
for settle-
ment contains
a provision for
a penalty of only $1,000.
The Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement also contains
a provision
under which Respondents must close the subject site unless
a permit is ap-
plied for and received from the Agency.
The Board
feels that the Stipulation and Proposal
for Settlement
in
this case are acceptable.
This Opinion constitutes
the Board’s
findings of fact and conclusions
of law.
IT
IS THE ORDER
of
the Pollution Control
Board
that:
1.
Respondents
Carl
Havens and Ralph Havens, d/bJa Havens
Disposal
are
found to have violated Section
21
(e) of the Environmental Protection
Act,
and Chapter
7,
Rule 202 (b)(1) of the Solid Waste Rules
and Regulations.
2.
Respondents
Ralph Havens and Carl
Havens, d/b/a Havens
Disposal
shall
pay
a penalty of $1,000 for said violations.
Payment is
to be made within
35 days of the adoption of
this Order by certified check or money order
to
the State of Illinois,
Fiscal Services Division,
Illinois Environmental Pro-
tection Agency,, 2200 Churchill
Road, Springfield,
Illinois
62706.
3,
Respondents
Carl Havens and Ralph Havens, d/b/a
Havens Disposal, shall
cease and desist refuse disposal activities at the subject site and properly
close said site unless
an appropriate operating permit has been applied for
within 30 days of the adoption of this Order
and obtained within
120 days of
the adoption of this Order.
I,
Christan
L. Moffett,
Clerk of the Illinois
Pollution
Control Board,
hereby
certify
the
above
Opinion
&
Order
were
adopted
on
the /~~~day
of
1975
by
a
vote
of ~to
~
15
—
260