ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    January
    ~,
    1975
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
    COMPLAINANTS
    PCB 74—206
    JEFFREY GALlON, INC.,
    a
    Delaware
    )
    Oo:cporatLon,
    RESPONDENT
    )
    MR.
    JEFFREY S. HERDEN, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, in behalf of
    COMPLAINANTS
    MR. THOMAS M, McMAHON OF SIDLEY & AUSTIN
    in
    behalf
    of
    RESPONDENT
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr~ Marder)
    This action involves a Complaint filed by the People of
    the State
    of
    Illinois on June 4, 1974, charging Jeffrey
    Galion, Inc., with viol—
    tion of
    Rule
    2—2.54
    of the
    Rules and Requlations
    ________________
    Governinq
    _________________
    Air
    Poll—
    ion, and
    Rule 203 (a) ct the
    :~S
    Pollution Regulations, in the op-
    eration of its Whiting No~6 gray iron cupola, located at 4401 W.
    Roosevelt Road, Chicago, Cook County, Illinois.
    On June 19, 1974, Complainant filed an Amended Complaint, which
    joined
    the
    Environmental Protection Agency as a party
    complainant.
    The matter was set for hearing,
    and
    hearing was held in Chicago,
    Illinois, on October 17, 1974.
    At the hearing the parties submitted a Stipulation of Facts as to
    the Complaint.
    No
    agreement as
    to an order or penalty was reached,
    and this was left .open to the Board to set.
    The cupola operated at Respondent~s Roosevelt Road facility was
    used primarily in connection with a related gear manufacturing facil-
    ity.
    The Amended Complaint charged violation of particulate emission him-
    itations from July 31, 1973, through an unstated date in 1974, There~
    fore, both the Rules and Regulations Governing Air Pollution and the
    Air Pollution Control Regulations are applicable.
    It is stipulated
    that the process weight
    rate
    for the cupola was
    11~0Q0lbs/hr. It is further stipulated that for a
    cupola of the
    ~1ze
    In question,
    the
    ailawahie particulate emission is 20
    lbs/hr.
    Table 7~l0~1
    La
    AP-42~ Compilation of Air Pollutant
    Emission Factors,
    15—175

    shows the uncontrolled emissions from a cupola such as the one in
    question, would be 17 lbs. per ton charged. Respondent admits that
    even with
    pollution control equipment, an after burner
    that reduces
    emissions 50, emissions were
    47
    lbs. per hour per day operated. This
    is more than twice the allowable emissions.
    On May 30, 1974, Dresser industries,
    Inc., acquired
    the
    Gallon Co.
    Dresser determined that the facility in question should be closed for
    certain economic and business reasons enumerated in the Stipulation.
    The plant was shut down permanently on August 31, 1974.
    On the facts as stipulated, the Board finds that from July 1, 1973,
    through December 31, 1973, Respondent violated Rule 2-2.54 of the
    Rules and Regulations Governing Air Pollution, and from January 1,
    1974, through
    August
    31, 1974, violated Rule 203 (a) of the Air_Poll-
    ution Regulations.
    Since the facility has been closed down permanently, no order need
    issue on abatement of pollution. That has already been accomplished.
    Therefore, the only question left relates to the imposition of a fine.
    The record in this matter shows no intent to violate the regulations
    by Respondent. In fact, Respondent had certain pollution control equip-
    ment installed on the facility. The primary purpose of the Environmen-
    tal Protection Act is to bring about clean air. Penalties are designed
    to aid “the enforcement of the Act and punitive considerations are sec-
    ondary” (City of Monmouth v. Environmental Protection Agency et al.,
    57 Ill. 2d :482, 313 N.E. 2d, 161 19741).
    The imposition of a fine in this matter will serve to aid in the
    administration and enforcement of the Act, in showing that one cannot
    pollute for two years at no cost. Therefore, a small penalty of $250
    will be levied against Respondent.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions of
    law of the Board.
    ORDER
    IT IS THE ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that:
    1. Respondent, Jeffrey Galion, Inc., and its successor in inter-
    est, Dresser Industries, Inc., are found to have violated Rule
    2-2.54 of the Rules and Regulations Governing the Control of Air
    Pollution, and Rule 203 (a) of the Air Pollution Re~ulations
    for the period of time stated
    in the Amended Complaint.
    2. Respondent, Jeffrey Gahion, Inc., and its successor in inter-
    est, Dresser Industries, Inc. shall pay to the State of Illinois
    the sum of $250 within 35 days from the date of this Order.
    Penalty payment by certified check or money order payable to
    the State of Illinois shall be made tom Fiscal Services Division,
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, 2200 Churchill Road,
    Springfield, Illinois, 62706.
    15
    1 7~

    —~—
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, certify
    tjiat the above
    Opinion and Order was adopted by t~e
    Board on
    the
    ~
    day of
    —‘
    ,
    1975, by a vote of ~
    to
    ~~___.
    •~5—~177

    Back to top