ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    January 3, 1975
    IN THE MATTER OF
    R73-13
    PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES
    DISSENTING OPINION (by Mr~,
    Dumelle):
    I cannot vote for this regu1ation~ The nitrate standard
    with the compromise “Note (bY” may be a hazard to public health~
    The table of limits for nitrate~nitrogenpurports to set
    the limit
    at
    10 mg/l but “Note (b)” allows levels up to 20 mg/l
    for 15 days at a time,
    There is not one scintilla of evidence that 15
    days
    of
    ingestion
    of 20 mg/l nitrate-nitrogen water is safe; either for babies,
    for
    pregnant
    women
    or for adults with glucose—6 enzyme deficiency. Mr.
    Marder himself has stated that he set the 15~dayperiod as a
    compromise
    between a flat prohibition
    of any
    levels above 10 mg/l and the
    Agency~sdesire for unlimited periods up to 20 mg/i. Perhaps even
    tw,o days of ingestion at 20 mg/l is too much let alone fifteen days.
    We~,just
    do not know.
    The notice provisions of “Note (b)” will
    be
    imperfectly administered,
    All of us have had the experience of missing events announced in the
    newspapers or over the radio
    or
    television. The same lack of communica-
    tion
    will
    happpen with this regulation~ Many people, and especially
    those ghetto residents without pediatricians, will not know when
    high-nitrate water runs in their taps. They may mistakenly boil
    water and thus concentrate the
    nitrates even
    more.
    And a
    young baby
    or an enzyme—deficient adult will suffer, perhaps fatally, because
    bf this regulation.
    Methemoglobinemia can be fatal, It is commonly detected as
    cyanosis and that from the blue lips of a child. Will a black baby
    in
    the ghetto show these symptoms before damage occurs? Will the
    mothers know enough to go to a doctor when their child~sfingertips
    and lips become blue? To ask the question is
    to
    answer it, Some
    will not and the damage will occur.
    15
    155

    In ~urimar~’, ba nitrat~ ~ g~1atz~n~tr “t~ot~~b ~ a
    woadly h:s~c~ Ard
    i~ WI~J ~
    ‘erf~”~y
    A1fl:~~~
    31
    I would hope that ~he so n ~-o-be~promu1gatcd Fodo~a1Drink~rg
    ‘~Jat~rStandards wo~Jdhold ~o tIe ~~62 nitrato~nitr~gen~tandard £
    10 mg/I. Far better to put cafe wa er irto peop e~shnc~ a alJ
    times than to try to reach their via electronic and print m~drato
    prevent them from drinking water wnicb was safe the day bef~
    ~,
    I, Christan L, Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, I~erebycertify the above Dissenting Opinion was submitted on
    tne ~~~day
    of
    ~
    1975,
    Christan L, o fet
    Illinois Pollution
    rol Board

    Back to top