ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
May 8, 1975
TRW, INC., Cinch Divisions,
Petitioner,
vs.
)
PCB 75—30
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
HARVEY M. SHELDON, Attorney for Petitioner
PETER ORLINSKY, Attorney for Respondent
OPINION
Z~ND
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Henss):
TRW appeals from the Agency denial of operating permits
for certain automatic plating lines and metal plating facilities
at Petitioner~sHoman Avenue facility. In the alternative, if
the
permits are not issued, TRW seeks variance from Rule 204(f)
(2) of the Air Pollution Control Regulations in order to allow
sufficient time for reduction’ of sulfuric mist emissions con-
sistent with that Rule.
TRW, Inc., Cinch Divisions, owns and operates a facility
at 1026 South Homan Avenue, Chicago, Illinois for the manufacture
of various kinds of electrical connectors. Operations at this
facility primarily involve metal finishing and plastic molding.
Approximately 30,000 lbs. of metal contacts and 20,000 lbs. of
plastic products are produced each month.
Permit applications for Petitioner~sAcid Cleaner Operation,
J3rite Dip and Tin Plating Operation were denied by the Agency on
December 10,’ 1974 on grounds that these operations
‘would
emit
sulfuric acid mist in excess of the rate permitted under Rule
204 (f) (2)
When this matter went to hearing, the parties submitted a
Stipulation for an Agreed Order. As the Stipulation notes, the
Board adopted amendments to Rule 204(f) (2) of the Air Pollution
Control Regulations on March 26, 1975 (effective April
24,
1975).
The effect of these amendments was to moot Petitioner’s need for
variance after the effective date of the amendments.
16—597
—2—
The parties agree. that the Petitioner’s description of
its activities, as outlined in Paragraphs 1 through 11, 17
and 18 of the Petition, is accurate and that emission data
contained in the Petition is substantially correct. The
Agency believes that Petitioner’s emissions are in conformity
with amended Rule 204(f)(2). With this understanding, the
Agency expresses its willingness to grant operating permits
to Petitioner upon formal resubmission of operating permit
applications.
It is further stipul&ted by the parties that it would be
an arbitrary and unnecessary hardship for Petitioner to cease
operations pending issuance of operating permits by the Agency.
No public objection has been raised to the grant of this
variance. There is no substantial evidence of nuisance or
other conditions of air pollution resulting from the operation
of these sources.
The solution agreed to by the parties is acceptable to the
Board.
This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and con-
clusions of law of the Illinois Pollution Control Board.
ORDER
It is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that:
1. TRW, Inc., Cinch Divisions, is granted variance
from Rule 204(f) (2) of the Air Pollution Control Regu-
lations from January 22, 1975 until April 24, 1975.
2. Petitioner is granted variance from Rule 103(b)
of the Air Pollution Control Regulations to operate its
Brite Dip, Tin Plating and Acid Cleaner Operations at its
Homan Avenue facility until the earlier of 120 days from
the date of this Order, or until the Agency acts to grant
or deny operating permits for these operations. Variance
from Rule 103(b) is conditioned upon the resubmission by
Petitioner to the Agency by June 7, 1975 of complete
operating permit applications for each of said operations.
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, here~pcertify the above Opinion and Order were adopted
on the ~
day of May, 1975 by a vote of
4—o
Christan L. Moffet?,/,~4erk
Illinois Pollution ~d~(tro1 Board
16—598