ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    May 8, 1975
    TRW, INC., Cinch Divisions,
    Petitioner,
    vs.
    )
    PCB 75—30
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    HARVEY M. SHELDON, Attorney for Petitioner
    PETER ORLINSKY, Attorney for Respondent
    OPINION
    Z~ND
    ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Henss):
    TRW appeals from the Agency denial of operating permits
    for certain automatic plating lines and metal plating facilities
    at Petitioner~sHoman Avenue facility. In the alternative, if
    the
    permits are not issued, TRW seeks variance from Rule 204(f)
    (2) of the Air Pollution Control Regulations in order to allow
    sufficient time for reduction’ of sulfuric mist emissions con-
    sistent with that Rule.
    TRW, Inc., Cinch Divisions, owns and operates a facility
    at 1026 South Homan Avenue, Chicago, Illinois for the manufacture
    of various kinds of electrical connectors. Operations at this
    facility primarily involve metal finishing and plastic molding.
    Approximately 30,000 lbs. of metal contacts and 20,000 lbs. of
    plastic products are produced each month.
    Permit applications for Petitioner~sAcid Cleaner Operation,
    J3rite Dip and Tin Plating Operation were denied by the Agency on
    December 10,’ 1974 on grounds that these operations
    ‘would
    emit
    sulfuric acid mist in excess of the rate permitted under Rule
    204 (f) (2)
    When this matter went to hearing, the parties submitted a
    Stipulation for an Agreed Order. As the Stipulation notes, the
    Board adopted amendments to Rule 204(f) (2) of the Air Pollution
    Control Regulations on March 26, 1975 (effective April
    24,
    1975).
    The effect of these amendments was to moot Petitioner’s need for
    variance after the effective date of the amendments.
    16—597

    —2—
    The parties agree. that the Petitioner’s description of
    its activities, as outlined in Paragraphs 1 through 11, 17
    and 18 of the Petition, is accurate and that emission data
    contained in the Petition is substantially correct. The
    Agency believes that Petitioner’s emissions are in conformity
    with amended Rule 204(f)(2). With this understanding, the
    Agency expresses its willingness to grant operating permits
    to Petitioner upon formal resubmission of operating permit
    applications.
    It is further stipul&ted by the parties that it would be
    an arbitrary and unnecessary hardship for Petitioner to cease
    operations pending issuance of operating permits by the Agency.
    No public objection has been raised to the grant of this
    variance. There is no substantial evidence of nuisance or
    other conditions of air pollution resulting from the operation
    of these sources.
    The solution agreed to by the parties is acceptable to the
    Board.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and con-
    clusions of law of the Illinois Pollution Control Board.
    ORDER
    It is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that:
    1. TRW, Inc., Cinch Divisions, is granted variance
    from Rule 204(f) (2) of the Air Pollution Control Regu-
    lations from January 22, 1975 until April 24, 1975.
    2. Petitioner is granted variance from Rule 103(b)
    of the Air Pollution Control Regulations to operate its
    Brite Dip, Tin Plating and Acid Cleaner Operations at its
    Homan Avenue facility until the earlier of 120 days from
    the date of this Order, or until the Agency acts to grant
    or deny operating permits for these operations. Variance
    from Rule 103(b) is conditioned upon the resubmission by
    Petitioner to the Agency by June 7, 1975 of complete
    operating permit applications for each of said operations.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, here~pcertify the above Opinion and Order were adopted
    on the ~
    day of May, 1975 by a vote of
    4—o
    Christan L. Moffet?,/,~4erk
    Illinois Pollution ~d~(tro1 Board
    16—598

    Back to top