ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    May 9, 1997
    ROBBINS RESOURCE RECOVERY
    PARTNERS, L.P., owner, and FOSTER
    WHEELER ILLINOIS, INC., operator.,
    Petitioners,
    v.
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    PCB 97-197
    (Provisional Variance - Land)
    ORDER OF THE BOARD (by C.A. Manning):
    Pursuant to Section 35(b) of the Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS
    5/35(b)), Robbins Resource Recovery Partners, L.P., owner, and Foster Wheeler Illinois, Inc.
    operator (petitioners) have requested that the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    (Agency) recommend that the Board grant a provisional variance pursuant to Section 35(b) of
    the Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5/35(b)(1994)). Such request for
    provisional variance and notification of recommendation were filed with the Board by the
    Agency on Thursday, May 8, 1997. Pursuant to Section 35(b) of the Act, the Board must
    issue the variance within two (2) days of this filing.
    Pursuant to a construction permit (No. 1990-068-DE) which by its terms expired May
    7, 1997, petitioners have developed a waste-to-management energy-facility (facility) for the
    management of municipal solid waste (MSW). Petitioners have applied to the Agency for both
    extension of the now-expired construction permit, as well as for an operating permit. The
    Agency decision on these permits is not required to be made until June 2, 1997. At the
    facility, MSW is received on the tipping floor, then sorted, sized, and shredded, and a portion
    is turned into refuse-derived fuel (RDF) after extraction of recyclable materials.
    Pursuant to Section 35(b) of Act (415 ILCS 5/35(b)), the Agency, by and through its
    Associate Director, Renee Cipriano, seeks a provisional variance to allow petitioners to
    continue to operate their solid waste management facility pending Agency decision on their
    various pending permit applications. The provisional variance would allow the receipt, manual
    processing, storage and repacking of waste for transport to disposal sites, but not its
    incineration.
    Specifically, the Agency recommends that we grant petitioners a 24-day provisional
    variance for their Cook County facility from certain requirements limiting the acceptance of

    2
    municipal waste, as imposed by Special Conditions #1 and #3(a), (b), and (c) of its
    Development Permit No.1990-068-DE. This variance period is recommended to commence
    “from the date of the Pollution Control Board’s order in this matter to June 2, 1997.”
    (Agency Recommendation at 1.)
    The Agency recommends that the Board grant the requested provisional variance with
    specified conditions. In its recommendation, the Agency noted the following:
    The Illinois EPA has concluded, based upon representations of the Petitioners, that
    discontinuing municipal waste (“MW”) acceptance at the Site will have impacts upon
    the Village of Robbins, temporary and permanent employees of the Facility, and twelve
    (12) municipalities which have contracted with the Facility for recycling and disposal of
    their MW. Discontinuing MW acceptance at the Site will cause a loss of needed
    revenues to the Village of Robbins, and loss of wages to the temporary and permanent
    employees at the Site. Additionally, the municipalities of Calumet City, Dixmoor, Park
    Forest, Robbins, Country Club Hills, Ford Heights, Phoenix, Steger, Crete, Markham,
    Richton Park, and Thorton, the twelve communities that have entered into contracts
    with Robbins Resource Recovery Partners, L.P., may experience increased disposal
    costs due to the discontinuance of MW acceptance at the Site.
    (Agency Recommendation at 1.)
    The Agency maintains that a grant of a provisional variance would violate no federal
    laws. The Agency believes that a denial of the requested provisional variance would create an
    arbitrary or unreasonable hardship on the petitioners.
    PETITIONER’S EMERGENCY REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED RULING
    Prior to the Board’s receipt of the Agency’s recommendation in this matter, petitioners
    filed an emergency request for expedited ruling. Petitioners maintain that “any delay in
    granting the request for provisional variance will cause an arbitrary and unreasonable
    hardship.” (Petitioners’ Emergency Request at 2.) Further, petitioners note the following:
    RRRP and Foster Wheeler will suffer significant financial hardship because they will be
    unable to operate their facility until after the Board acts on the Agency’s
    recommendation. In addition, as is explained in the attached Verified Petition, the
    Village of Robbins, where the facility is located, receives significant financial benefits
    from the operation of the facility. Thus, the Village of Robbins will also be harmed by
    any delay in the Board’s ruling on the Agency’s recommendation. Finally, as is also
    set forth in the attached petition, a number of the facility’s employees are residents of
    the Village of Robbins and they will be without pay during any shutdown.
    (Petitioners’ Emergency Request at 2.)

    3
    The Agency, in its recommendation, does not challenge petitioners’ assertion that this is
    an emergency situation.
    ANALYSIS
    Provisional variances are by their very nature temporary. The responsibilities of the
    Agency and the Board in these short-term provisional variances are different from the
    responsibilities in standard variances. (See 415 ILCS 5/35(b) & 36(c)). In provisional
    variances it is the responsibility of the Agency to make the technical determinations and finding
    of arbitrary or unreasonable hardship. The Board’s responsibilities are to adopt a formal
    order, to assure the formal maintenance of the record, to assure the enforceability of the
    variance, and to provide notification of the action by a press release.
    The Board acts on this provisional variance today primarily to avoid any public health
    concerns which could flow from disruption of waste disposal services to the 12 affected
    communities. Since, as explained in more detail below, the Board’s discretion to act under
    Section 35(a) is severely circumscribed, we believe it appropriate to act on this matter pursuant
    to the emergency notice and meeting provisions of Section 5 of the Act (415 ILCS 5/5) and
    Section 2.02 of the Open Meetings Act (5 ILCS 120/2.02). Notice of this meeting was given
    to the Board’s Members and posted on May 8, 1997.
    Having received the Agency recommendation that a denial of the requested relief would
    impose an arbitrary or unreasonable hardship, the Board hereby grants the petitioners a
    provisional variance pursuant to Section 35 of the Act from Special Conditions #1 and #3(a),
    (b), and (c) of its Development Permit No.1990-068-DE, on the following conditions:
    1.
    The term of this provisional variance shall commence on May 9, 1997 and shall
    expire on June 2, 1997;
    2.
    Petitioners shall not combust muncipal waste (MW) or refuse derived fuel
    (RDF) at the site during the period of this provisional variance;
    3.
    The petitioners shall not operate any emission source or air pollution control
    equipment at the facility during the period of the provisional variance;
    4.
    The petitioners shall not store RDF at the facility during the period of the
    provisional variance;
    5.
    The petitioners shall only receive, manually process, store and repack MW from
    the twelve municipalities referenced herein. Further the MW shall be limited to
    the MW authorized under the air construction permit and the Development
    Permit and contemplated by the petitioners’s application for air and land
    Operating Permits pending with the Agency;

    4
    6.
    Petitioners shall at least once every 24 hours of operation, remove all MW from
    the tipping floor. The tipping floor shall be swept to remove all waste. No
    waste shall remain at the facility when the facility is not scheduled to be open
    the following day;
    7.
    Petitioners shall maintain a contingency plan that provides for the proper
    management of leaky containers. This plan must include, but not be limited to,
    shipping and handling damaged containers first. Containers which are not open
    to the atmosphere and therefore minimize leachate generation must be utilized.
    8.
    Petitioners shall ensure that access doors in the MW receiving, RDF processing,
    and RDF storage areas are closed except as needed for safe passage of vehicles,
    personal and material;
    9.
    Petitioners shall conduct walk-through inspections at least once daily to ensure
    compliance with the fugitive particulate matter emissions requirement, the
    closed door requirements and any other applicable statutory or regulatory
    requirement. Such inspections shall be recorded in a log, with the dates and
    times of the inspections and the names of the employees performing the
    inspections;
    10.
    Petitioners shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the receipt of MW,
    manual storting of MW for recycling, and repacking of MW for transport to a
    facility properly permitted to receive the MW does not threaten or allow air
    pollution or violation of any Board regulations;
    11.
    Petitioners shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the receipt of MW,
    manual storting of MW for recycling, and repacking of MW for transport to a
    facility properly permitted to receive the MW does not emit beyond the facility
    any noise that creates a public nuisance or violation of any Board regulations;
    12.
    Petitioners shall, to the extent necessary and appropriate, conduct activities
    authorized by this provisional variance in accordance with its fugitive particulate
    matter emissions operating program, which has been submitted to, and reviewed
    by, the Agency’s Bureau of Air;
    13.
    Petitioners shall, during the term of this provisional variance, comply with the
    terms of the unaffected portions of the Development Permit, and any other
    statutory or regulatory requirements not expressly addressed in the
    recommendation, as necessary and appropriate.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.

    5
    Section 41 of the Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/41 (1994)) provides for
    the appeal of final Board orders to the Illinois Appellate Court within 35 days of the date of
    service of this order. The Rules of the Supreme Court of Illinois establish filing requirements.
    (See also 35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.246 "Motions for Reconsideration".)
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, hereby certify that
    the above order was adopted on the 9th day of May, 1997, by a vote of 6-0.
    Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board

    Back to top