ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April 24, 1975
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Complainant,
V.
)
PCB
74—326
HAAG
LABOHATORIES,
Respondent.
OPINION
AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by
Mr. Dumelie):
This enforcement actions involves a
complaint
filed by the
Attorney General on
behalf of the Environmental Protection
Agency on September 6, 1974. Haag Laboratories is
charged
with operating a treatment works without an operating permit
from the Agency in violation of Rule 903 (a) of the Pollution
Control Board Regulations,
Chapter 3 (Water Pollution Regula—
tions), and Sections 12 (a) and 12 (b) of the Environmental
Protection Act, A hearing was held on February 3, 1975,
wherein a stipulation
and proposal fo:r settlement were
entered into,
Such stipulation constitutes the entire
record in this case~
Haag owns and operates a chemical manufacturing facility
located in Dixmoor, Cook County, I:Liinois, engaged in the
manufacture of detergent intermediates
and a finished shampoo
product,
Its facility includes a neutralization
treatment
tank of 12,000 gallon capacity with automatic pH adjustment,
having connections for discharge into a municipal sewer
‘system tributary to the Metropolitan Sanitary District, of
Greater Chicago
-
Calumet Sewage Treatment Plant,
Wastewater
containing hydrochloric
acid
is discharged to the treatment
plant as a by-product of
the reaction of chiorosulfonic acid
and lauryl alcohol to produce lauryl sulfate.
Miscellaneous
plant wastes and the run-off from an underground tunnel are
collected
in
underground storage tanks and subsequently are
discharged to the treatment tank. The wastes discharged to
the treatment tanks are neutralized
with
aqueous sodium
hydroxide or ammonium hydroxide, forming aqueous salt solutions
which are discharged to the aforesaid sewer system at approximately
neutral pH.
16—435
—2—
Haag commenced operating the treatment works in August
of 1973 and continued the operation of such treatment works
up to the filing of the complaint on September 6, 1974. The
discharge to the municipal sewer system was at all times
approved by the Metropolitan Sanitary District, from which a
permit had been obtained. Haag was under the impression
that such approval and permit satisfied all requirements for
the treatment and discharge to the sewer system. Soon
after the filing of the complaint, Haag submitted a permit
application to the Agency on October 17, 1974. A permit was
issued on December 23, 1974. Haag admits having operating
the treatment works from August, 1973 to September 6, 1974
without an operating permit issued by the Agency. We find
that this stipulation is adequate to warrant finding Haag in
violation as alleged
in
the complaint.
By way of mitigation the stipulation further provides
that in another matter under investigation by the Agency,
not the subject of a complaint before the Board, involving a
water pollution problem of indeterminate origin, Haag is
cooperating in the clean up of a ditch or creek flowing
through its property at a cost in excess of $15,000.
Haag further stipulated that it agreed to pay, immediately
upon receipt of this
Order,
a
penalty of
$500
in
full settlement
of the causes of action alleged in the complaint and occurring
prior to the date of the stipulation. We accept the terms
of this settlement in full.
This Opinion constitutes the Board~s findings of fact
and conclusion of law.
ORDER
Haag Laboratories, Inc. is ordered to pay, upon receipt
of this
Order, the penalty of $500 for the violations of
Rule 903(a) and Sections 12(a) and 12(b) found herein.
Penalty payment by certified check or money order payable to
the State of Illinois shall be
made
to: Fiscal Services
Division, Environmental Protection Agency, 2200 Churchill
Road, Springfield, Illinois 62706.
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, ~~terebycertify the above Opinion and OFder was adopted on
the
~4I”
day of April, 1975 by a vote of ~
oJ~~
ChristanL.
4~
Motfe
r~j~
k
~jClerk
Illinois Pol1utioi~/~”ontrolBoard
16 —436