ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April
10, 1975
MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY,
Petitioner,
vs.
)
PCB 75—26
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr. Henss):
In People of the State of Illinois vs. Minnesota Mining and
Manufacturing Company,
PCB 74-225,
3M agreed to upgrade its
Magnetic Production Wastewater Treatment System by replacing
existing chemical feedpumps and by installing an additional
sludge pump and two sample pumps.
It was anticipated that pumps
would be received at
the
facility in September 1974.
Petitioner
now requests variance from the Board Order which was entered in
PCB 74-225 since the pump vendor has postponed delivery of the
pumps until February 1975.
Paragraph D at page
31 of the Stipulation provides that:
“3M’s time for performance of any term of this Stipulation may
be extended by the Board for good cause upon application by 3M
after reasonable opportunity for People to respond to any such
application”.
Because of the delay in pump delivery, Petitioner
requests
an extension of time “to coincide with
the promised
delivery dates”
to complete the upgrading project.
The Agency believes that Petitioner has been delayed by
circumstances beyond its control and that the request for an
extension of time is for “good cause”.
According to the Agency
the short extension of time will not affect the over-all performance
of
the compliance schedule.
The EPA recommends
the granting of
variance until March
31,
1975.
The Board agrees that the delay was beyond the control of
Petitioner and will grant the additional time to and including
April
15, 1975 in order to provide some leeway for minor delays.
Petitioner
is proceeding with design of facilities
to
implement the Long-Range Program.
Permits for an outfall
extension have been received from the Illinois Department of
16—395
—2—
Transportation and the Environmental Protection Agency.
An
application to the U.
S.
Corps of Engineers is pending.
If
the
final permit is issued at a time of adverse weather and
high
water
conditions,
Petitioner
speculates
that
it
may
be
necessary
to
request
a
further
extension
of
time.
We believe Petitioner was merely informing the Board and
Agency of the possibility of such
a request for extension and
we do not construe the correspondence as a variance request
for additional time to extend the outfall.
Such a variance
request would be premature at this time.
This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact
and conclusions of law.
ORDER
It is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that Minnesota
Mining and Manufacturing Company be granted an extensiun of
time from the time schedule adopted in settlement of PCB 74-225
until April
15, 1975 for the purpose of installing pumps required
by Item
8 of the Stipulation Agreement.
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order was adopted
this
~6~’
_day of
____________,
1975
by
a
vote
of
4tob.
16
—
396