ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    June
    6,
    1975
    ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Complainant,
    v.
    )
    PCB 74—476
    CLARENCE 0.
    NELSON,
    Respondent.
    Mr. Michael A. Benedetto, Jr.
    and Mr. Stephen
    Z. Weiss,
    Assistant Attorneys General appeared for Complainant.
    Mr.
    Kenneth J. Gumbiner and Mr. Robert F.
    Casey appeared for
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Goodman):
    This matter comes before the Pollution Control Board
    (Board)
    upon the Environmental Protection Agency’s
    (Agency)
    December 17, 1974 Complaint and March
    31, 1975 Amended
    Complaint.
    Clarence 0.
    Nelson (Nelson)
    is charged,
    therein,
    with operating
    a solid waste management site without
    a
    permit in violation of Rule 202(b) (1)
    of Chapter
    7:
    Solid
    Waste Regulations and therefore in violation of 21(b)
    and
    21(e)
    of the Act.
    As the Amended Complaint merely conforms
    to the proof, we grant the Agency’s motion to file it.
    Nelson
    is located in Kendall County and takes care of
    80
    of Aurora’s household refuse
    (R40).
    Nelson also ser-
    vices Piano, Illinois.
    Several interested citizens test-
    ified to the hardship they and/or their cities would exper-
    ience if Nelson is shut down.
    The principal hardship would
    be increase of costs based upon the greater distance to the
    next closest landfill
    (13
    to
    25 miles)
    and the higher cost
    of dumping
    ($0.20 more per ton or $0.35 more per yard).
    Nelson is open
    5 1/2 days per week and takes in 800 cubic
    yards per day at an average charge of
    $0.80 a yard
    (R233)
    Mr.
    C.
    0.
    Nelson admits that the landfill has no develop-
    mental or operating permit issued by the Agency
    (R226).
    Nelson has applied several times for a permit,
    the
    first
    time
    in 1971 and the latest,
    in 1974.
    Respondent contends that a permit issued by default.
    Its basis for this contention is that it filed an applic-
    ation on June 28, 1974 and a more information letter was not
    sent by the Agency until August 22,
    1974.
    Rule 205 per-
    taining to permit applications does provide for default
    operating permits in subsection
    (g)
    in the event the Agency
    fails td take
    final action within 45 days from the filing
    thereof.
    An app-lication is deemed filed when receiied by
    the
    Agency
    (205(f)).
    No evidence is contained in the record
    17
    261

    —2—
    as to the date the Agency received the application.
    In
    addition the record does not state the date on which the
    application was sent.
    Rule 205(e) provides that applica-
    tions be sent via registered or certified mail, return
    receipt requested.
    Nelson has failed to carry its burden in
    proving the elements of
    a default permit.
    The Board must
    find that no default permit issued.
    As a violation of 202(b) (1)
    is not a violation of 21(b)
    of the Act,
    see EPA V.
    E.
    &
    E. Hauling, PCB 74—473
    (1975),
    that portion of the Amended Complaint alleging a violation
    of Section 21(b) must be dismissed.
    The Agency’s witness, Mr.
    Beechley, upon cross examina-
    tion,
    stated that he had no knowledge of leachate or pollu-
    tion from the site
    (201—202).
    However, from borings taken,
    Mr. Beechley concluded that
    “the natural soils at the site
    were somewhat less than desirable for natural attenuation of
    leachate.”
    (R207)
    In mitigation, the Respondent has attempted to comply
    with all of the Agency’s requests.
    Nelson has placed drain
    tiles under the landfill to collect leachate.
    A plastic
    liner was installed
    over
    the
    clay
    and
    more
    clay
    placed
    on
    top
    to
    collect
    leachate
    a~d drain
    it
    into
    a
    retention
    tank.
    (R266)
    The Board finds that Nelson has operated, since July 27,
    1974, without a permit and assesses a penalty of $500.00
    against Nelson for said violation of Rule 202 (b) (I)
    and
    §21(e)
    of the Act.
    Mr. Dumeile will file a Concurring Opinion.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and
    conclusions
    of
    law
    of
    the
    Board
    in
    this
    matter.
    ORDER
    It is the Order of the Board that:
    (a)
    C,0. Nelson cease and desist from operating its
    solid waste management site unless
    it applies for and
    obtains an appropriate operations permit within 120 days of
    the date of this order.
    (b)
    C.O. Nelson is ordered to pay, within 45 days,
    a
    penalty of $500.00 for the violations of Rule 202(b) (1)
    of
    the So1~tIWaste Regulations and Section 21(e)
    of the Envi-
    ronmental Protection Act found herein.
    Penalty payment by
    certified check or money order payable to the State of
    Illinoi.
    shall be made to:

    —3—
    Fiscal Services Division
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    2200 Churchill Road
    Springfield, Illinois
    ~220b
    (c)
    That portion of the Amended Complaint alleging a
    violation of Section 21(b)
    of the Ac:. is hcreby dismissed,
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pojiution
    Control Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order
    were adopted on thea
    ~t’~-
    day
    of
    _______
    1975 by a vote of
    ~
    —.
    Christan L. Moffe?t,
    Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    17
    —263

    Back to top