ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    September 29,
    1975
    INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER
    COMPANY,
    )
    Petitioner~
    v.
    )
    PCB 74—277
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Respondent.
    Mr. Alan
    I. Becker and Mr. Jeffrey
    L. Brown,
    on behalf of
    Petitioner;
    Mr. Peter
    E. Orlinsky and Mr. Thomas
    R.
    Casper,
    or, behalf of
    Respondent.
    OPINION
    AND
    ORDER ~F THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Goodman):
    On July 31,
    1975, upon the Board’s own motion for
    reconsideration
    in this cause,
    the parties were ordered to
    present briefs on the following issues:
    1.
    Whether the attainment date for National Primary
    Ambient Air Standards for the State of Illinois is
    May
    31, 197~,and, if the answer to the foregoing is
    no:
    2.
    What is tie attainment date for the national primary
    ambient air st~indardsfor the State of Illinois under
    Section 110 of the Clean Air Act,
    42 USC 1857 et ~
    In addition, ~ny person desiring to be heard on this
    issue was invited to present a brief thereon.
    The Board has received the briefs of the parties and
    the presentationr of two other interested organizations,
    Citizens for a Better Environment, and United States Environ-
    mental Protection Agency.
    In the aforesaid presentations,
    the following dates were proposed as
    the attainment date for
    National Primary Aithient Air Standards for the State of
    Illinois and in particular the date for the Chicago Metropoli-
    tan Area for particulate emissions:
    May 31,
    1975
    July,
    1975
    July
    31,
    1975
    August
    5,
    1977
    If anything became clear from the presentations in
    response to our July 31,
    1975 Order,
    it is that the final
    18
    734

    —2—
    attainment date
    foi’ particulate emissions in the Chicago
    Metropolitan Area for National Primary Ambient Air Standards
    is not clear.
    ThE. argument for the May
    31, 1975,
    date
    revolves around the fact that approval for the major part of
    the Illinois Implementation Plan occurred on May
    31,
    1972,
    (37 Federal Register 10,863).
    However, that portion of the
    plan which provided for the attainment of the primary particu-
    late standard fcr the Chicago Metropolitan Area was specifi-
    cally disapproved due to an injunction which prevented the
    Board from enforcing particulate regulation against comrner—
    cial and residenti~lusers of coal in Metropolitan Chicago.
    Roth Adam Fuel Comp~inyet al
    v.
    Pollution Control Board,
    Circuit Court of Ccok County
    72 CH 1484.
    This original
    plan, which was dis~.pproved,provided for an attainment date
    of July
    31, 1975.
    On July 27,
    1972, the Administrator
    revised the plan by deleting the July,
    1975 date and substi-
    tuting “footnote A”
    which provided “three years from plan
    approval or promulgation.”
    The substitution was made because
    the July,
    1975,
    c’ate “was not acceptable”
    (presumably due to
    Roth Adam)
    37 FR 15,083
    (July
    27,
    1972).
    On March 14,
    1973,
    Roth Adam was reversed by the Appel-
    late Court of the First District,
    10 Illinois Appellate 3d
    756.
    on October 22,
    1973,
    the Illinois Environmental Protec-
    tion Agency communicated the fact of the Roth Adam reversal
    to the USEPA in the form of supplemental information to the
    plan.
    Consequently,
    on August
    5,
    1974,
    the Administrator
    revoked his prior disapproval of the portion of the plan
    pertaining to particulate standards in Metropolitan Chicago.
    39
    FR 28,155
    (Auqust
    5,
    1975).
    Clearly, May
    31,
    1975,
    is not the attainment date for
    particulates
    in Metropolitan Chicago since it must be assumed
    that “footnote A”
    re:~ersto the approval date of the revised
    plan, that is August
    5,
    1974.
    It is illogical to assume
    that “footnote A”
    refers to the approval date of the unre-
    vised plan, May
    31,
    1972, because,
    If that had been the
    Administrator’s
    inte:ition, instead of substituting “footnote
    A” for the July,
    1975, date,
    he merely had to substitute the
    May
    31,
    1975,
    date.
    In addition,
    it must be noted that the
    Administrator us?s
    the May
    31, 1975 date as the attainment
    date for carbon mc~noxidein the Chicago Metropolitan Area.
    The Board finds,
    therefore,
    that May 31,
    1975,
    is not the
    attainment date of the national standards
    for particulate
    matter in the Metropolitan Chicago Area of Illinois.
    It is not clee.r from the information before the Board
    what date is the attainment date for the National Primary
    Ambient Air Standards for particulate matter in the Chicago
    Metropolitan Area.
    t~owever, it is sufficient for the purpose
    of this action that the attainment date is at least July,
    ~L975. The Board has been informed by a letter dated Septem-
    ~er
    8,
    1975,
    from Robert B. Schaefer, Regional Counsel,
    United States Environmental Protection Agency,
    that the

    —3—
    attainment date is July 31,
    1975,
    stating in addition that a
    July, 1975,
    date ha~consistently been interpreted by the
    Agency to be July
    31, 1975.
    The Board finds that the final
    attainment date for National Primary Ambient Air Standards
    for particulate matter in the Metropolitan Chicago Area is
    at least July 31,
    1975 and,
    therefore, there was no error in
    granting variance from the particulate standards to Peti-
    tioner until July 26,
    1975.
    The Order of June
    6,
    1975,
    is
    affirmed.
    IT
    IS
    SO
    ORflERED.
    I,
    Christan
    L.
    Moffett,
    Clerk of the Illinois
    Pollution
    Control Board, her~hycertify the above Opinion and Order
    were adopted on the
    ______________
    day of
    ______________
    l975byavoteof4’..~
    Illinois Pollution C
    ol Board
    18
    736

    Back to top