‘3

ILLflOIS

POLLUTIOJ

4

July 17

I

B

D

C.

a

41

L

‘1

cd

Ii

I

0

ep

~

lit

at.

0

C-

113a

~

d

t4 nir.

-Se

fib

11

.1

£1108

r1a~rant

3.

it

ad

porch

mdc y

t

r

ad

ti

o ai c

1

0

i.e

.3

s.

C.,

C

isa

rd1~r.

It

3.

Loc.

t..

-

intt

b~drocws

t.

aart

R

3

aesponde

t...

e

a

as 25 teetfror

-

)

tic.

~

utit

tas

inst.

1

‘upoxaately$lO

ta

n

her

d

olsng(R

1

a

ugh

aic

ii

t

C

d

d

I

C

cx

t

3.

...t..t~1 tect

oat

t

-

‘feo

axa.’

shone

ci

t

~imatr

‘3973

R.

17

td

r

I

C3

—I

a

it

---

—2—

Complainant unsuccessfully attempte

in 1973 to convince

ent to alter the operation of te~

a.

P

7),

Since the

rat all Village requirements a

ci wa~,c iv

iertly located

t e existing furnace ducting system

sc~

den

refused to

iaageo

1

0

120

r

1

staller,

a

ici

C

L

C

car

a.

V

C

C1

fc

r

r o~

n

La

tha

a

Lime

s

lac exc~sFiva

de

rca (R~ 26

a.

N

44),

~rd

r

p

C)

TI.

ici

~a1ti and

a

t

e family has

ía.

51)

o~.

N

celia

r

leBor

u

we

•

t~

t

pitA

a

1

-c

I

u

u

A)

c

i

~

/

C

I-

‘p

)

~a

c

in

I

4

a

2

ci

r

1

t

t ía ea

a the

Je for

~ulated

‘oes at

4

Ic!r,.

a

ao

(1

52)

lens from

73

In

r

dic

ef

a

p

vTh.c

j

I

u~

r

1

~o

IC

~

Ihird, altaoioh Li

aj~

after Co’ pica in

t

acU al

on

do exia~.to limit the noise emissions,

Ba

we conclude that unreasonable interference

h-pier

ac

boen established,

I

d

Le~rrininoan appropriate

ereay

e reiterate the

ci

it od rature of the difficult?es and tie fact that the

c t severe

Responde at

~

í

c

easonable

duca

the emissions by,

f

r cx

ip c

installing a

cttie

near

the unit to det1e~ttie emissions back

1

ir

It

4

1

~

w

I

r

or

cc tast~

sb

I

A

t

a

tl

1

e

is

p

a

a. ci

43

cc

a

I:

in a.

nec

ii

b

a

a

El)

on

C

)

I

)

C

abet

t

0

t~r

‘4

of otners

±_sioa

JO

r

I

ira

s

ce

s suitably

r

i~irg tn her home,

a

cans

ed

n all these facts,

under Rule 102 of

18

—

129

---

—3—

towards her own property.

Relocation of the unit is another

possibility.

Other procedures calculated to achieve the same

This constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions

IT IS THE ORDER of the Pollution Control Board

that:

1.

Respondent shall cease and ~desist violating Rule 102

of Chapter

Order.

2.

Respondent shall carry out appropriate methods to

limit the noise emissions from her property.

shall be completed within

60 days of the adoption of this Order.

3.

Respondent shall report to the Board her efforts to

control the noise emissions from her air—conditioning unit.

The

report shall be sent to the Board at 309 West Washington Street,

Suite

300, Chicago, Illinois 60606 within 90 days of the adoption

of this Opinion and Order.

Mr.

Zeitlin dissents.

I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control

Board, hereby certify that the above Opinion and Order was

adopted on the

/7~”

day of July,

1975,

by a vote of 4!..

/

~tanL.of~V~~

Illinois Pollution C

ol Board

18

—