ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
October 30, 1975
CITY OF BELOIT, WISCONSIN,
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 75—229
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
MR. FRANK
M. COVEY, JR. and LOUIS M. RUNDIO, JR., appeared on behalf
oi Petitioner;
MR.
JEFFREY S. HERDEN, appeared on behalf of Respondent.
OPINION
AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Dumelle):
Petitioner
filed a Variance Petition and a Permit Appeal
on June 2,
1975, On June 3, 1975 Petitioner amended its
Petition. The
Environmental Protection Agency (Agency)
filed
a Recommendation to grant the Variance subject to
certath
conditions on August 27, 1975. This Recommendation
was amended
on September 4, 1975 and September 29, 1975.
A
hearing
was held on August 26, 1975 in Rockton, Illinois.
At the
hearing a settlement was outlined between the parties
which was
subsequently ratified by
the
Beloit City Council
on September 15,
1975. Petitioner
filed
a copy of the
resolution
authorizing settlement and the memorandum in
support of the variance petition on September 26, 1975.
PetitIoner, a Wisconsin city, operates a landfill located
on
a 32—acre site near the intersection of Highway 51 and
Prairie 1-1±11
Road, in Roscoe Township, Winnebago County,
Illinois. The
landfill is used to dispose of refuse from
Wisconsin
generated in the City of Beloit and Beloit and Turtle
Townships.
The City of South Beloit, and the Townships of Rockton
and
Roscoe located in Illinois, dispose of their refuse at the
landfill.
Approximately 300 cubic yards of refuse are accepted daily.
fend and
gravel were excavated from the site prior to 1946.
from 1946
to
1965 the site was used as a trash disposal
facility.
Petitioner states
that in
1965 it proceeded to
upgrade the
site into a sanitary landfill. Petitioner
19— 147
—2—
contends
that
the site was operated
so as to comply with the
requirements of the Illinois Sanitary Water Board (SWB) and
the Div:Lsi~nof Sanitary Engineers of the Illinois Department
of Public Health, The Agency maintains that from at least 1961
on
the Department of Public Health records indicate that the
contaminants from materials in the landfill would have a direct
access to the
ground water reservoir (Agency Exhibit B).
Petitioner seeks a variance from the permit requirements
found in Section 21(e) of the Illinois Environmental Protection
Act (Act) and Rules 202(b) and 316(b) of the Solid Waste
Regulations. Petitioner originally sought the variance to
continue operations for one year in order to dispose of refuse
from its own city and from the other neighboring areas.
Petitioner
also challenges the Agency denial of permit
applications.
In challenging the permit denial, Petitioner
puts forth numerous arguments. However, as a result of the
settlement presented, these issues are moot as Petitioner
has agreed to withdraw its permit appeal should the Board
crant the variance to allow the closing of the site (Paragraph
6
Memorandum of Petitioner (September 26, 1975)).
Petititioner specifically denies that the landfill has
contributed
to
any pollution of surface or ground water (Resolu-
tion of City Council, No. 4671 (September 26, 1975)). The
Agency, on the other hand, contends that potential for
contamination of ground water exists and that actual monitoring
data collected during July, 1975 demonstrates that contamination
is indeed occurring (pp. 5, 6, of Agency Recommendation).
Mr.
Richard Miller who lives approximately
one block west of
the landfill
testified that
his well water is discolored and
smells (R.
11). Although Petitioner has not
presented a strong
case which
would
normally warrant a variance, the
Board has
determined that
the
settlement presented represents an environmentally
sound method of abating problems associated with this landfill.
Petitioner has
beer in constant contact with the Agency regarding the
rec~u:Lred permit
for which
it has
applied
and reapplied numerous times.
Therefore,
we have
decided to
grant the variance from June 2, 1975
until
October 18, 1975
subject to the agreed to conditions which are
set
forth in the Order which follows.
rrhis
Opinion
constitutes the Board~s findings of fact and
conclusions of law.
—3—
ORDER
The permit
appeal is hereby dismissed.
The City of Beloit, Wisconsin is granted a
variance from
June 2, 1975 until October
18, 1975 from Section 21(e) of the
Act and Rules 202(b)
and
316(b)
of the Solid Waste Regulations
subject
to the following conditions:
1, That the variance
be granted only up to and
including October 18,
1975;
2. That during the term of the variance, Petitioner
cor:Lply
with aLl
requirements of Chapter 7, especially those
relating to daily, intermediate
and final cover;
3,
That
on
October 18, 1975, Petitioner cease accepting
refuse, close ~-tssite and begin final covering of the site;
4, That Petitioner apply final
cover
in conformance with
tee
recommended procedures explained in paragraph 17 of the
Acency Recommendation;
5.
That
Petitioner ensure that the north and east slopes
arc not: :Less than 4 to I, with a minimum of 4 feet of
seeded
and stabilized
cover material on these side slopes
as per
paragraph (d) of
Petitioner~s
July 22, 1974, permit application;
6. That Petitioner conduct a ground and surface water
monitoring program as described in paragraph 1 of the Agency’s
November
i,
1974 letter (Petitioner’s Exhibit I), and as
further described and expanded in paragraph 9 of the Agency
Recommendation;
7. That
if
Agency inspections on
or before May 31, 1976
reveal substantial leaching from the site, that Petitioner
complete
construction of the clay berm around the north and
east sides of
the
site and channel surface water and whatever
leachate might emerge from these side slopes to a clay-lined
retention pond to be constructed on the southeast portion
of the
site,
as per paragraph
3 of the Agency letter dated
November 1, 1974 (Petitioner’s Exhibit I), and in accordance
with
sketches and description contained in Petitioner’s
Novemoer 27, 1974, application (Petitioner’s Exhibit J)
.
19
—
149
—4—
8. That Petitioner shall
collect
any surface water
arid/or leachate from the retention pond and other ponded
areas and transport same to its sewage
treatment plant
for treatment,
as per Petitioner’s November 27, 1974,
application (Petitioner’s Exhibit
J),
and as per Stanley J.
Goldsmith’s
October 24, 1974, letter to Frank 3. Zuicarelli,
(Agency Exhibit I);
9, That, within
sixty
(60) days of the date of the
Board’s Order in this case, Petitioner submit
to the Board
and the Agency, a plan subject to Agency approval for site
maintenance after closure,
in compliance with Rule 318 of
Chapter 7: Solid Waste Regulations;
10.
That Petitioner complete the application of intermediate
cover by no later than November 30, 1975 and complete applying
and grading final cover, and all other requirements of sub—
paragraphs (e) through (h) above as soon as possible and in
no event later than July 31, 1976;
ii. That
Petitioner begin seeding operations as soon as
weatner permits in
Spring, 1976 and complete seeding by no
later than July 31, 1976; and
12. Within
28 days after the date of the Board Order
herein the Petitioner
shall execute and forward to the
Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency,
2200 Churchill
Road,
Springfield, Illinois 62706, and to the
Pollution
Control
Board a
Certification of Acceptance and agreement
to be
bound to all terms and conditions of the variance.
The form of said
certification shall be as follows:
1,
(We)
,
having
read and
f~:L1~understanding the Order
of
the Illinois Pollution
Control Board in
PCB 75-229 hereby accept said Order and agree
to
be
bound by all of the terms
and conditions thereof.
Signed
Title
Date
IT IS SO
ORDERED.
19— 150
—5—
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Or~erwere adopted on
the
~
day of October, 1975 by a vote of __________________________
Christan L. Moffeti~,ç~rk
Illinois Pollution trol Board
19—
151