ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    October 30, 1975
    CITY OF BELOIT, WISCONSIN,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 75—229
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    MR. FRANK
    M. COVEY, JR. and LOUIS M. RUNDIO, JR., appeared on behalf
    oi Petitioner;
    MR.
    JEFFREY S. HERDEN, appeared on behalf of Respondent.
    OPINION
    AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Dumelle):
    Petitioner
    filed a Variance Petition and a Permit Appeal
    on June 2,
    1975, On June 3, 1975 Petitioner amended its
    Petition. The
    Environmental Protection Agency (Agency)
    filed
    a Recommendation to grant the Variance subject to
    certath
    conditions on August 27, 1975. This Recommendation
    was amended
    on September 4, 1975 and September 29, 1975.
    A
    hearing
    was held on August 26, 1975 in Rockton, Illinois.
    At the
    hearing a settlement was outlined between the parties
    which was
    subsequently ratified by
    the
    Beloit City Council
    on September 15,
    1975. Petitioner
    filed
    a copy of the
    resolution
    authorizing settlement and the memorandum in
    support of the variance petition on September 26, 1975.
    PetitIoner, a Wisconsin city, operates a landfill located
    on
    a 32—acre site near the intersection of Highway 51 and
    Prairie 1-1±11
    Road, in Roscoe Township, Winnebago County,
    Illinois. The
    landfill is used to dispose of refuse from
    Wisconsin
    generated in the City of Beloit and Beloit and Turtle
    Townships.
    The City of South Beloit, and the Townships of Rockton
    and
    Roscoe located in Illinois, dispose of their refuse at the
    landfill.
    Approximately 300 cubic yards of refuse are accepted daily.
    fend and
    gravel were excavated from the site prior to 1946.
    from 1946
    to
    1965 the site was used as a trash disposal
    facility.
    Petitioner states
    that in
    1965 it proceeded to
    upgrade the
    site into a sanitary landfill. Petitioner
    19— 147

    —2—
    contends
    that
    the site was operated
    so as to comply with the
    requirements of the Illinois Sanitary Water Board (SWB) and
    the Div:Lsi~nof Sanitary Engineers of the Illinois Department
    of Public Health, The Agency maintains that from at least 1961
    on
    the Department of Public Health records indicate that the
    contaminants from materials in the landfill would have a direct
    access to the
    ground water reservoir (Agency Exhibit B).
    Petitioner seeks a variance from the permit requirements
    found in Section 21(e) of the Illinois Environmental Protection
    Act (Act) and Rules 202(b) and 316(b) of the Solid Waste
    Regulations. Petitioner originally sought the variance to
    continue operations for one year in order to dispose of refuse
    from its own city and from the other neighboring areas.
    Petitioner
    also challenges the Agency denial of permit
    applications.
    In challenging the permit denial, Petitioner
    puts forth numerous arguments. However, as a result of the
    settlement presented, these issues are moot as Petitioner
    has agreed to withdraw its permit appeal should the Board
    crant the variance to allow the closing of the site (Paragraph
    6
    Memorandum of Petitioner (September 26, 1975)).
    Petititioner specifically denies that the landfill has
    contributed
    to
    any pollution of surface or ground water (Resolu-
    tion of City Council, No. 4671 (September 26, 1975)). The
    Agency, on the other hand, contends that potential for
    contamination of ground water exists and that actual monitoring
    data collected during July, 1975 demonstrates that contamination
    is indeed occurring (pp. 5, 6, of Agency Recommendation).
    Mr.
    Richard Miller who lives approximately
    one block west of
    the landfill
    testified that
    his well water is discolored and
    smells (R.
    11). Although Petitioner has not
    presented a strong
    case which
    would
    normally warrant a variance, the
    Board has
    determined that
    the
    settlement presented represents an environmentally
    sound method of abating problems associated with this landfill.
    Petitioner has
    beer in constant contact with the Agency regarding the
    rec~u:Lred permit
    for which
    it has
    applied
    and reapplied numerous times.
    Therefore,
    we have
    decided to
    grant the variance from June 2, 1975
    until
    October 18, 1975
    subject to the agreed to conditions which are
    set
    forth in the Order which follows.
    rrhis
    Opinion
    constitutes the Board~s findings of fact and
    conclusions of law.

    —3—
    ORDER
    The permit
    appeal is hereby dismissed.
    The City of Beloit, Wisconsin is granted a
    variance from
    June 2, 1975 until October
    18, 1975 from Section 21(e) of the
    Act and Rules 202(b)
    and
    316(b)
    of the Solid Waste Regulations
    subject
    to the following conditions:
    1, That the variance
    be granted only up to and
    including October 18,
    1975;
    2. That during the term of the variance, Petitioner
    cor:Lply
    with aLl
    requirements of Chapter 7, especially those
    relating to daily, intermediate
    and final cover;
    3,
    That
    on
    October 18, 1975, Petitioner cease accepting
    refuse, close ~-tssite and begin final covering of the site;
    4, That Petitioner apply final
    cover
    in conformance with
    tee
    recommended procedures explained in paragraph 17 of the
    Acency Recommendation;
    5.
    That
    Petitioner ensure that the north and east slopes
    arc not: :Less than 4 to I, with a minimum of 4 feet of
    seeded
    and stabilized
    cover material on these side slopes
    as per
    paragraph (d) of
    Petitioner~s
    July 22, 1974, permit application;
    6. That Petitioner conduct a ground and surface water
    monitoring program as described in paragraph 1 of the Agency’s
    November
    i,
    1974 letter (Petitioner’s Exhibit I), and as
    further described and expanded in paragraph 9 of the Agency
    Recommendation;
    7. That
    if
    Agency inspections on
    or before May 31, 1976
    reveal substantial leaching from the site, that Petitioner
    complete
    construction of the clay berm around the north and
    east sides of
    the
    site and channel surface water and whatever
    leachate might emerge from these side slopes to a clay-lined
    retention pond to be constructed on the southeast portion
    of the
    site,
    as per paragraph
    3 of the Agency letter dated
    November 1, 1974 (Petitioner’s Exhibit I), and in accordance
    with
    sketches and description contained in Petitioner’s
    Novemoer 27, 1974, application (Petitioner’s Exhibit J)
    .
    19
    149

    —4—
    8. That Petitioner shall
    collect
    any surface water
    arid/or leachate from the retention pond and other ponded
    areas and transport same to its sewage
    treatment plant
    for treatment,
    as per Petitioner’s November 27, 1974,
    application (Petitioner’s Exhibit
    J),
    and as per Stanley J.
    Goldsmith’s
    October 24, 1974, letter to Frank 3. Zuicarelli,
    (Agency Exhibit I);
    9, That, within
    sixty
    (60) days of the date of the
    Board’s Order in this case, Petitioner submit
    to the Board
    and the Agency, a plan subject to Agency approval for site
    maintenance after closure,
    in compliance with Rule 318 of
    Chapter 7: Solid Waste Regulations;
    10.
    That Petitioner complete the application of intermediate
    cover by no later than November 30, 1975 and complete applying
    and grading final cover, and all other requirements of sub—
    paragraphs (e) through (h) above as soon as possible and in
    no event later than July 31, 1976;
    ii. That
    Petitioner begin seeding operations as soon as
    weatner permits in
    Spring, 1976 and complete seeding by no
    later than July 31, 1976; and
    12. Within
    28 days after the date of the Board Order
    herein the Petitioner
    shall execute and forward to the
    Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency,
    2200 Churchill
    Road,
    Springfield, Illinois 62706, and to the
    Pollution
    Control
    Board a
    Certification of Acceptance and agreement
    to be
    bound to all terms and conditions of the variance.
    The form of said
    certification shall be as follows:
    1,
    (We)
    ,
    having
    read and
    f~:L1~understanding the Order
    of
    the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board in
    PCB 75-229 hereby accept said Order and agree
    to
    be
    bound by all of the terms
    and conditions thereof.
    Signed
    Title
    Date
    IT IS SO
    ORDERED.
    19— 150

    —5—
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Or~erwere adopted on
    the
    ~
    day of October, 1975 by a vote of __________________________
    Christan L. Moffeti~,ç~rk
    Illinois Pollution trol Board
    19—
    151

    Back to top