1. Petitioners,
      2. OPINION~ ORDER OF THE BOARD (by Mr. Zeitlin):
      3. ORDER

ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONT?OL
LOAN:?
October 16, 1975
MR.
AND
MRS.
ROOSEVELT
NIXON,
JR.
Petitioners,
)
PCB 75—354
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
OPINION
~
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr.
Zeitlin):
Petitioners,
Mr. and Mrs.
Roosevelt Nixon,
Jr.
,
filed
a
PetItion
for Variance on September 10,
1975,
seeking relief
from
Order No,
7
in
the case of League of Women Voters
v.
North
Shore
Sanitary
District, PCB 70—7,
12,
13 and 14,
I
POD
3C~, 396~71.
TeAgency
Recommendation in this
matter
was
filed on September
29,
1975.
No hearing was held
in
this
matter.
Petitioners
were first affected by
the
North Shore
Sanitary
District
sewer ban when that Order was entered
on
Auqust
31,
1971.
In
August,
1975,
Petitioners purchased
pro:)erty
in
North
Chicago,
expecting
that
the sewer ban
would
be
lifted.
Petitioners
seek
permission
to build a
single-family
residence
on
the newly purchased property.
The
hardship
claimed by Petitioners
is
largely
financial,
Petitioners claim that
they
are
eligible for
government
loans which are available
to individuals
in
certain income brackets,
and that,
if
they are not allowed
to
proceed soon with construction
of
a new
home,
they will
not
be
able to obtain such government assistance.
In
addition,
Petitioners claim that their
present
3~:oee~oom
townhouse
is overcrowded.
Petitioners have three
children,
ages 13,
11, and
8.
The Agency Recommendation states that the hardship
alleged
by Petitioners might not normally be considered
sufficiently extreme to justify a Variance.
However, the
Agency
points
out that the grant of
this
Variance will have
a
minimal
impact,
in
that the problems of overflow at the
North
Chicago
sewage
treatment plant of the North Shore
Sanitary
District
have been eliminated by the construction
a
combined
over—flow retention basin system, which was
comoleted
in
January,
1975,
The
Agency also points out the
:Jact
that
flows
at
the
North
Chicago
sewage treatment plant
hive
been
within
tnat
p1ant~s
treatmen-~. ca~acity,
and
that
~f:pi~ic~n~:
from
the
North
Chicaqo
sewage
treatment
plant
have
ceen
within
the
limits
set
by
its
NPDES
permit.

It also appears
from the Agency Recommendation that the
effluent of the
North
Chicago
plant
will
be diverted to the
North Shore
Sanitary District~snew Gurnee plant, which is
scheduled
for
completion
in
November,
1975.
After that time,
discharges
from
the
North
Chicago
plant
into Lake Michigan
will be
eliminated.
That being the case,
it would appear
that the grant
of this Variance would
not
contravene the
purposes of
the North Shore Sanitary District sewer ban:
the protection
of Lake Michigan.
1 PCB at 385.
The Agency
also notes that the sewers
to which Petitioners’
proposed home will
be connected are not subject to overflow,
bypassing,
or
backup.
Such backup or sewer overflows have been
important
in
past
Board
decisions
in
sewer
ban
Variances.
We agree with the Agency that the hardship present here
is minimal;
however, any damage to the environment,
or to
public
health,
which might result from the construction of
Petitioners’
new
home
is essentially nil.
The Gurnee plant
will,
according to
the Agency Recommendation,
be on line
before
construction of Petitioners~ new home
is complete.
There is
no reason that this Variance cannot be granted.
This Opinion
constitutes the findings of fact and
conclusions of law of the Board in this matter.
ORDER
Petitioners,
Mr.
and Mrs. Roosevelt Nixon,
Jr., are
ranted
a Variance
from Order No.
7
in League of Women
Voters
v.
North Shore Sanitary DistrictT~CB 70-7,
12, 13,
a~ 1,
to allow a sewer connection for the construction
of
a single—family
residence on the following property:
Lots
13, 14, and
15 in Block 112
in South
Waukegan, being
a subdivision of the West
half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 32,
Township
45
North,
Range
12,
East
of
the
3rd
P.M.
and
the
West
half
of
the
Northwest
Quarter
of
Section
5,
Township
44
North,
Range
12,
East
of
the
3rd
P.M.
in
Lake
County, Illinois.
I, Christan L.
Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and
Order
were
adopted on the
/~
day of
___________,
1975 by a
VOte
of
~
Mr.
Young
abstained.
~
/
~
Illinois Pollution
Control Bc
19— 113

Back to top