ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    October
    9,
    1975
    ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION
    AGENCY,
    Complainant,
    v.
    )
    PCB 75—161
    FRANK
    FOUNDRIES
    CORPORATION,
    an
    Iowa
    Corporation,
    Respondent.
    Mrs. Joan
    C.
    Wing,
    Assistant
    Attorney
    General,
    Appeared
    on
    behalf of Complainant;
    Mr.
    Daniel S.
    Churchill, Churchill and Churchill, appeared
    on behalf of Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Goodman):
    This matter comes before the Pollution Control Board
    (Board)
    upon the April
    15,
    1975,
    Complaint of the Environ-
    mental Protection Agency
    (Agency) which charges
    the Respon-
    dent, Frank Foundries Corporation
    (Frank), with violating
    Rule 103(b) (2)
    of the Air Regulations and Section 9(b)
    of
    the Environmental Protection Act (Act).
    A hearing
    was
    held
    on July 10,
    1975,
    and a “Stipulation of Facts and Agreed
    Settlement” was filed September
    18, 1975.
    Frank,
    an Iowa Corporation qualified to do business in
    Illinois, owns and operates a gray iron foundry
    in Moline,
    Rock Island County,
    Illinois.
    The Moline facility consists
    of two cupolas, four sand mullers,
    a shakeout area,
    a shot
    blast area, and a grinding area.
    The cupolas serve as the
    supply source of molten cast iron that is poured into sand
    molds
    to produce gray iron castings.
    They are operated
    singly on an alternate day basis and have one Environeering
    Incorporated wet scrubber system.
    The cupola stacks do not
    contain afterburners for carbon monoxide control.
    Frank has applied for an operating permit several times
    since April
    1,
    1974.
    However, either due to lack of infor-
    mation or carbon monoxide emissions
    in excess of Rule 206(e)
    of the Air Regulations,
    each permit application has been
    denied.
    The Agency notified Respondent several times that
    it was operating in violation of the Air Regulations due to
    its failure
    to obtain an operating permit.
    19—15

    —2—
    Frank
    had
    petitioned
    the
    Board
    for
    variance
    from
    Rule
    206(e)
    while
    trying
    to
    control its carbon monoxide emis-
    sions.
    The Respondent’s variance petition was dismissed in
    April
    of
    1975.
    Respondent,
    in
    its
    stipulation,
    admits
    that
    it
    has
    operated its foundry facility since December
    1,
    1972,
    with-
    out having received an operating permit from the Agency as
    required by Rule 103(b) (2) of the Air Regulations and there-
    fore in violation
    of Section 9(b)
    of the Act.
    Frank has spent approximately $465,000 for particulate
    and carbon monoxide control since
    1970
    (R.15).
    In addition,
    Frank agrees to install an afterburner system to bring the
    cupola operation into compliance with Rule 206(e).
    Respon-
    dent further agrees
    to obtain all necessary construction and
    operating permits.
    For its violation of Rule 103(b) (2) of
    the Air Regulations and Section 9(b)
    of the Act, Frank has
    stipulated
    to a penalty of $3,000.
    The Board accepts the stipulation and settlement of the
    parties and finds Respondent to have violated Rule 103(b) (2)
    of the Air Regulations and Section 9(b)
    of the Act since
    December
    2,
    1972.
    The Board assesses the stipulated penalty
    of $3,000.00 for said violations.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and
    conclusions of law of the Board in this matter.
    ORDER
    It is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that:
    1)
    Respondent, Frank Foundries Corporation,
    is found
    to have violated Rule 103(b) (2)
    of the Air Regulations and
    Section
    9(b) of the Environmental Protection Act,
    since
    December
    1,
    1972; and
    2)
    Respondent shall apply for and obtain
    a construc-
    tion permit for installation of an afterburner system for
    its cupolas within 90 days of this Order.
    Said system shall
    be designed to bring the operation of the cupolas
    into
    compliance with Rule 206(e)
    of the Air Regulations; and
    3)
    Respondent shall apply for an operating permit
    within
    10 days of the afterburner being installed and opera-
    tional, and obtain said operating permit for its gray iron
    foundry facflity within 180 days of the date of the receipt
    of
    a construction permit for said afterburner system; and
    19— 16

    —3—
    4)
    Respondent shall pay as
    a penalty for the afore-
    mentioned violations the stipulated sum of $3,000.00, pay-
    ment to be made within
    35 days of receipt by Respondent of
    this Order by certified check or money order to:
    Control Program Coordinator
    Division of Air Pollution Control
    Environmental Protection Agency
    2200 Churchill Road
    Springfield,
    Illinois
    62706
    Mr. Henss Abstains.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby certify the above Opini n and Order
    were adopted on the
    _____________
    day of
    _____________
    1975byavoteof~3~b
    Christan
    L. Moffet
    ,
    Illinois Pollution Co6.~6lBoard
    17

    Back to top