ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    February 11,
    1976
    CPC INTERNATIONAL,
    INC.,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 75—175
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
    AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    AND
    S.O.R.E.
    Intervenor.
    Mr. James W. Gladden,
    Jr. and Ms. Percy Angelo, Mayer, Brown, and
    Platt appeared on behalf of the Petitioner;
    Ms. Kathryn
    S.
    Nesburg, Assistant Attorney General appeared on
    behalf
    of Respondent;
    Mr. Dan Galatzer appeared on~behalf of Intervenor.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Goodman):
    This matter comes before the Pollution Control Board
    (Board)
    upon the Amended Petition of CPC International,
    Inc.,
    (CPC)
    for
    variance from Rules
    203(g) (1) and 203(i) (4)
    of the Air Regulations
    until March
    1,
    1977.
    The instant variance petition was filed
    April
    28,
    1975, amended August .12,
    1975,
    and supplemented October
    22,
    1975.
    The Agency
    filed its recommendation August
    12,
    1975,
    and an amended recommendation January
    6,
    1975.
    A hearing was held
    October 27,
    1975.
    CPC seeks
    this variance for its corn wet milling plant
    in
    Bedford Park, Cook County,
    Illinois.
    Petitioner’s process steam
    and electricity are supplied by five boilers, two of which are
    225 MMBTU/hr gas-fired and the others being 332.5 MMBTU/hr pulver-
    ized,
    dry bottom,
    coal-fired boilers.
    The coal-fired boilers’
    emissions are currently controlled by multiclone dust collectors.
    1800 people are employed at Petitioner’s Bedford Park plant
    (R74)
    where 100,000 bushels
    of corn per day are milled and processed into
    finished products which include corn sugar,
    corn starch,
    corn oil
    and corn syrup.
    20—13

    —2—
    CPC had previously received variances from Rule 104 of the
    Air Regulations in PCB 73-212 and 74-340.
    The purpose of these
    variances was to investigate the possibility of burning a combi-
    nation of solid waste and pulverized coal in its coal-fired boilers.
    Emissions were to be controlled by bag-houses.
    Petitioner was unable
    to obtain
    a steady source of pelletized solid waste
    fuel
    to operate
    on a regular basis.
    Indeed, Petitioner states that,
    in order for
    the proposed fuel combination to be financially reasonable,
    the
    solid waste content would be between 30 and 50
    (R125).
    Apparently
    CPC never obtained enough solid waste fuel to burn for 10 hours
    consecutively at that percentage
    (R129).
    CPC expended in excess
    of $100,000.00 on this research project
    (R179).
    The Board finds
    that CPC has substantially complied with the conditions of its
    previous variances.
    In the Case of Commonwealth Edison Company v.
    Pollution Control
    Board,
    Doc.
    No.
    47352,
    the Supreme Court of Illinois affirmed an
    Appellate Court decision reversing the Board’s adoption of 203(g) (1).
    As Rule 203(i) (4) concerns the date of compliance with Rule 203(g) (1),
    the petition for variance from both Rules will be dismissed as moot.
    This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and conclu-
    sions of law in this matter.
    ORDER
    It is the Order of the Board that CPC’s petition for variance
    from Rules
    203(g) (1) and 203(i) (4)
    of the Air Regulations be and
    is, hereby, dismissed without prejudice.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Christan L. Moffett,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board4 hereby certify
    t e above Opinion and Order were adopted on the
    ii
    ~
    day of
    ,
    1976,
    by a vote of
    q..p
    Christan L. Moffet,ç,c~1erk
    Illinois Pollution’~ntro1 Board
    20—14

    Back to top