T
    ‘IP UTION CONTROL BOARD
    ~
    ~ry
    20,
    1977
    )
    PCB 76—268
    P
    ~T-L~
    IPARD
    (by Mr.
    Zeitlin):
    ~re
    tie
    Board on a Petition for Variance
    ~r~c~l Company
    (Stepan)
    on October
    27, 1976,
    ~
    ~ischarge
    limitation for biological oxygen
    ~uri~d
    solids
    (SS)
    in Rule 404(b)
    of Chapter
    3:
    ~s
    Baard~s
    Rules and Regulations.
    A Recom—
    -~
    nd
    ny
    Lo Environmental Protection Agency
    (Agency)
    ~o
    ~earing
    was held
    in this matter.
    ~
    by
    S~epan
    is an extension of previously
    ~
    L
    ~
    s~n±ro its
    Millsdale chemical plant located
    cr
    ~
    Will
    County,
    at which phthalic anhydride,
    I
    ~
    rr~ed:ates,
    dry
    cleaning emulsifiers,
    polyure—
    1~
    r
    I
    v~
    ~
    tigd
    purity
    specialities for the cosmetic
    Stepu:~s
    previous Variances were granted
    :
    mop
    history
    of litigation before this Board
    u~Le Plant,
    EPA
    v,
    Stepan and Stepan
    v. EPA
    ~
    I2~~489,
    73—184,
    11 PCB
    7
    (Jan,
    24,
    1974);
    i
    r
    B~c~
    r
    Environment
    v.
    Stepan and Stepan v. EPA
    ~c~ciao~
    P~B
    1—201,
    74-~270,
    74—317,
    15 PCB 445,
    15 PCB 467
    I
    ,
    ~‘~J~Juq,
    l~
    PCB
    469
    (Dr. Odell dissentinq as
    to
    0’~
    5)
    Id.
    ,
    (SU)pl
    ‘mc’rit
    fl
    I
    Op
    liii
    Ofl
    dfld
    Order
    ~.
    ~rirc
    103
    Reconsideration)
    ,
    16
    PCB
    539
    (May
    8,
    1975)
    ‘p
    n
    and
    Order
    on
    Remand
    from
    Appellate
    Court
    ~
    ‘~s~
    Tb
    I~st
    ,
    in
    Stepan
    Chemical
    Co.
    v.
    PCB,
    No.
    75-187,
    ~u
    3d Past,
    Ill,,
    June
    16,
    1976))
    (August
    5,
    1976);
    ~CB 71 -503
    (August
    5,
    1976)
    v~i~oui
    Oponions
    and Orders,
    cited above, fully
    ‘-ne
    ~pernt~ons
    of
    Stepan~s
    Millsdale Plant,
    and the history
    :1 ~xulLes
    ith
    its
    water discharges, originally
    to
    P
    o~
    to
    the
    Des
    Plaines River.
    We shall only repeat
    ~ic
    ~
    S~nan s
    most
    recent Variance, PCB 75—503, was
    or
    n
    r
    ~
    c~e c~ns~nition
    of
    major additions
    to its waste—
    Lr
    n~
    I~p1~,
    i~nc1uding
    (principally) construction of
    7
    a
    ti
    ‘abed
    sludge tank for equalization and
    ~dJ~
    o~al
    PP)
    ~c
    ~
    ~1
    arid
    the
    installation of the pressure
    r
    ~
    7~
    t
    eating
    secondary clarifier
    overflow,
    at
    a
    I_a
    7~
    24
    625

    —2—
    Stepan now seeks an extension of the Variance granted in PCB
    75-503, alleging that the extension is necessary by virtue of a
    long, and violent,
    strike at the Milisdale Plant which precluded
    completion of the wastewater treatment facility additions.
    Stepan
    alleges, and the Agency agrees
    in its Recommendation, that this
    strike was unforeseeable.
    The parties agree that despite concerted
    legal efforts by Stepan
    (including injunctive orders from both state
    and federal courts),
    it was not possible for Stepan’s contractors
    to cross the picket lines.
    As a result, Stepan’s Petition asks that
    the Variance granted
    in PCB 75-503 be extended through January 18,
    1977,
    or such further time as may be necessary for the establishment
    of an operational activated sludge system.
    The Agency’s Recommendation notes that the strike at the Mills-
    dale Plant was formally resolved on November
    1,
    1976 and,
    although
    construction should be completed by the end of December,
    1976
    (Rec.,
    ¶8), an activated sludge system cannot be operational at the Millsdale
    Plant until Spring,
    1977,
    The Agency therefore recommends
    that
    Stepan be granted a Variance until April
    1,
    1977.
    We agree with the Recommendation.
    All of the factors which
    led
    to our grant of a Variance
    in PCB 75-503 remain true,
    with this
    Variance extension required only as a result of factors beyond
    Stepan’s control,
    We have previously held that a delay in compliance
    caused by
    a strike beyond Petitioner’s control justifies
    the grant
    of a Variance.
    City of St. Charles
    v.
    EPA, PCB 74-176,
    13 PCB 269
    (1974)
    .
    Balancing the hardship to Stepan if this Variance were
    denied,
    against the likelihood of environmental damage,
    in light
    of Stepan’s good faith and imminent compliance,
    we find that
    a
    Variance
    is warranted.
    This Variance shall be conditioned upon compliance with all
    conditions in the Board’s Order in PCB 74-201,
    74-270 and 74-317
    (consolidated),
    supra, as was the Variance grant
    in PCB 75-503.
    We shall also require that Stepan continue its good faith efforts
    to minimize its effluent contaminant concentration,
    and submit a
    standard Certification of Acceptance.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
    of law of the Board in this matter.
    ORDER
    IT IS THE ORDER OF THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD that Petitioner
    Stepan Chemical Company be granted
    a Variance from Rule 404(b)
    of
    Chapter
    3:
    Water Pollution,
    for discharges from its Millsdale Plant
    to the Des Plaines River,
    from July 31, 1976 until April
    1,
    1977,
    subject
    to the following conditions:
    24
    626

    7
    -di conditions
    in the Board’s
    7
    a
    d
    74—317
    (consolidated)
    thr
    Board on May
    8,
    1975 and
    It
    all
    times operate its waste-
    -~
    to
    ainimize effluent contaminant
    oractical
    under construction
    ~rjdhin
    thirty
    (30)
    days of
    o~te
    and
    forward
    to
    the
    ~ency
    Control
    Program
    Coordi—
    -~‘i. Soringfield,
    Illinois 62706,
    otarcc
    in
    th
    following form:
    ______
    havjng read
    a
    Poll
    ition Control Board in case
    L~
    I
    and
    accept said Order, realizing
    odes
    all terms and conditions
    3
    I~foreeabIe
    SIGNED
    TITLE
    DATE
    att
    ~derk
    of
    the Illinois Pollution
    ~e
    ra:
    Lie above Opinion and Order were
    f
    ~
    1977,
    by
    a
    vote of
    4~.
    ~
    /\
    Christan
    L.
    Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    24
    627

    Back to top