ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    June
    18,
    1976
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Complainant,
    v.
    )
    PCB 75-6
    CITIZENS UTILITIES,
    )
    Respondent.
    Mr.
    James
    L.
    Dobrovolny, Assistant Attorney General, appeared on
    behalf of Complainant
    Mr.
    Daniel
    J.
    Kucera, Chapman and Cutler, appeared on behalf of
    Respondent
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Goodman):
    On January
    6,
    1976,
    the Environmental Protection Agency
    (Agency)
    filed a Complaint against Respondent Citizens Utilities
    Company of Illinois
    (Citizens).
    Citizens filed a Motion to Dis-
    miss on January
    22,
    1975.
    The Agency filed an Amended Complaint
    on January 24.
    On February 4, Respondent amended its Motion to
    Dismiss which was granted as to Count
    I.
    On March
    5,
    1975, the
    Agency filed its second Amended Complaint.
    On March 12, Citizens
    moved to dismiss again.
    That motion was denied as to Count
    I?
    the
    remaining portions being taken with the case by Board Order of
    April
    4,
    1975.
    Due to the Board’s decision herein,
    the remaining
    portions of said Motion are denied.
    Citizens provides public utility and sanitary sewer service
    in several portions of metropolitan Chicago.
    Included in its
    service area is the “Fernway—Westhaven” area,
    in which Citizens
    provides public water and sanitary sewer service to some 700
    customers located in the Fernway Subdivision of Orland Park and
    the Village of Westhaven.
    22—91

    —2—
    Count
    I of the Second Amended Complaint charges Respondent
    with violating Section 18 of the Environmental Protection Act
    (Act)
    in that Respondent has failed to distribute water which is
    clean and of satisfactory mineral character for ordinary domestic
    consumption.
    More particularly, Citizens
    is charged with dis-
    tributing water which is discolored and unpalatable due to the
    presence of excessive concentrations of iron.
    Count II charges
    violation of Section
    19 of the Act in that Respondent allegedly
    failed to submit bacterial samples
    to Complainant for fifteen
    months in 1973 and
    1974.
    Count III alleges that Citizens has
    allowed the existence of three operational and structural
    sanitary
    defects:
    i.e., lack of screen on well casting vents;
    an unscreened
    air relief valve vent pipe which terminates below ground levels;
    and fill line for the phosphate tank which terminates below the
    tank rim,
    in violation of Section
    18 of the Act.
    At a hearing conference on April
    21,
    1976,
    the parties agreed
    to submit a Settlement Agreement to the Board by
    May
    25,
    1976.
    That
    Settlement was received May 24,
    1976.
    Respondent’s public water supply system includes four wells,
    two elevated storage tanks and an integrated system of mains,
    hydrants, and appurtenances
    thereto.
    At a cost of $311,000.00,
    Citizens constructed Well No.
    3 which has been the primary water
    supply since December 23,
    1974.
    The underground waters are drawn
    from the wells,
    chlorinated,
    and fluoridated.
    Trisodium polyphos-
    phate is injected for iron control by sequestration.
    Since October
    of 1975,
    Respondent has attempted to control pH by feeding caustic
    soda.
    Since March,
    1975, Citizens has implemented a flushing pro-
    gram for its distribution system.
    The parties stipulate that water quality has improved since
    well
    No.
    3 became operational.
    That well has
    a depth of 1,700
    feet with capacity of 1,000 g.p.m.
    Respondent has also constructed
    a new
    400,000 gallon elevated storage tank at a cost of $226.000.0O.
    The parties stipulate that Respondent has consistently submitted
    the monthly bacterial samples at least since the filing of the Com-
    plaint and that the water is bacteriologically safe.
    The parties
    also stipulate to a dismissal of Count III.
    The Respondent,
    in consideration of the Settlement of this
    cause,
    agrees to remit $1,600 to the State of Illinois.
    In addi-
    tton,
    Respondent agrees to implement the following program which
    22—92

    —3—
    is taken verbatim from the Settlement Proposal:
    PROGRAM
    1.
    Respondent agrees to do the following:
    (a)
    To continue to use Well No.
    3 as
    its lead well, subject
    to unavailability due to mechanical failure or shutdown
    due to maintenance, repair, power outage,
    failure,
    or
    other operational difficulties.
    (b)
    To continue to regularly flush its distribution system
    as required to remove accumulated sediment and to con-
    trol sediment thereafter.
    (c)
    To submit all monthly bacterial samples required by
    Complainant, and to maintain records of the taking of
    such samples.
    (d)
    To continue its program for monitoring its water supply
    and distribution system and to maintain records thereof,
    and to permit authorized representatives of the Illinois
    Environmental Protection Agency and of the office of the
    Illinois Attorney General, Environmental Control Division,
    reasonable inspection of such records.
    (e)
    To monitor and control any corrosive tendencies of the
    water supply,
    Respondent shall adjust the pH by the addi-
    tion of caustic when necessary as indicated by an average
    chlorine residual in finished water at either
    .5 ppm
    combined or .15 ppm free.
    For purposes of this subpara-
    graph,
    the residual shall be measured by a weekly sample
    by Respondent from the distribution system at the south
    end of 170th Place in the Fernway Subdivision.
    The
    “average chlorine residual” shall be based upon the read-
    ings of said samples for the period April
    1,
    1976,
    to
    October
    1,
    1976.
    At the Agency’s request,
    samples taken
    in September,
    1976,
    shall be joint—samples taken by repre-
    sentatives of Respondent and the Agency.
    (f)
    Respondent shall eliminate the dead-end water mains
    located in the Village of Westhaven at the south end
    of the streets from 90th to 94th Avenues by installing
    22—93

    —4—
    a water main of at least
    8”
    diameter connecting to the
    mains
    in each of said streets at the south end thereof.
    Such work shall be completed by October
    1,
    1976.
    (g)
    Respondent shall
    flush monthly its water mains located
    at the south end of the streets
    in the Fernway Sub-
    division, and Leonard A Lindstrom, engineer for the
    Agency,
    and David Varner, engineer for Respondent,
    shall
    cooperate to experiment with valving at such locations
    to improve the effectiveness of such flushing.
    (h)
    In the event that Respondent is unable to maintain the
    average chlorine residual,
    as defined in subparagraph
    (e)
    above,
    then it shall install a water main of at
    least
    8” diameter connecting its main at the south end
    of 170th Place in the Fernway Subdivision with its main
    at the south end of 90th Avenue in the Village of West-
    haven.
    If such installation is required, the following
    schedule will be observed:
    (1)
    Application for Agency permit by December
    1,
    1976;
    (2)
    Agency permit issued by March
    1,
    1977;
    (3)
    Construction completed by June 1,
    1977,
    or by July
    1,
    1977,
    in the event of unfavorable weather condi-
    tions.
    Notwithstanding the foregoing,
    failure to maintain the
    average chlorine residual shall be excused, and the above
    work not required,
    if due to
    a cause beyond control of
    Respondent.
    (1)
    In the event that Respondent has maintained the average
    chlorine residual,
    as defined in subparagraph
    (e)
    above,
    during the rest period referred to therein, but fails to
    maintain it subsequent to October 1,
    1976,
    then within
    60 days after written notice from the Agency
    it shall
    implement the construction program described in subpara-
    graph
    (h)
    above,
    in accordance with a time schedule con-
    taining the relative time frames of the schedule contained
    therein.
    Failure to maintain the chlorine residual after
    October is defined as follows:
    when the average of the
    chlorine levels
    in weekly samples by Respondent for any
    calendar month from the south end
    of
    170th Place
    in the
    22—94

    —5—
    Fernway Subdivision is less than
    .5 ppm combined or
    .15
    ppm free.
    Maintaining on the average either level satis-
    fies the chlorine residual maintenance requirement.
    Not-
    withstanding the foregoing,
    failure to maintain the
    average chlorine residual shall be excused if due to a
    cause beyond the control of Respondent.
    (j)
    Respondent shall give prior notice by mail to customers
    of all scheduled flushings of its distribution system.
    (k)
    Respondent has established and will maintain a department
    in its office for the handling of service complaints by
    customers,
    in accordance with General Order 24, Revised
    of the Illinois Commerce Commission, and will expedite
    its training program for personnel handling such complaints.
    (1)
    Respondent has distributed and will continue
    to distribute
    periodically with its bills informative literature with
    respect to the customer’s use of water service, including
    maintenance of the customer’s hot water heater and water
    softener.
    (m)
    Respondent will actively attempt to have prosecuted
    persons who wrongfully open its hydrants or mains,
    provided that witnesses will cooperate by furnishing
    the necessary identification,
    evidence and testimony.
    (n)
    Respondent will comply with all applicable water supply
    requirements of the Statutes and Board regulations with
    respect to iron content subject to such variances and
    exceptions as may be allowed.
    The Board finds
    the Settlement Stipulation to be adequate and
    will accept it in settlement of this action.
    This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and conclu-
    sions of law in this matter.
    ORDER
    It is the Order of the Board that
    1)
    In
    consideration of the Settlement herein,
    this cause
    is hereby dismissed.
    22—95

    —6—
    2)
    Respondent shall remit $1,600.00 by certified check or
    money order payable to the State of Illinois within thirty-
    five days from the date of this Order.
    Said payment shall
    be sent to:
    State of Illinois
    Environmental Protection Agency
    Fiscal Services Department
    2200 Churchill Road
    Springfield, Illinois
    62706
    3)
    Respondent shall comply with the proposed program which
    is hereby incorporated by reference as though it were fully
    setforth herein.
    I, Christan
    L.
    Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereb
    certify the
    ove Opinion and Order were
    adopted
    on the
    /
    ~
    day of
    ,
    1976 by
    a vote of
    ~
    Illinois Pollution C
    rol Board
    22—96

    Back to top