ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
November
10, 1976
ARLAN R
•
JOHNSON,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
)
v.
)
PCB 76—176
)
)
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY)
)
Respondent.
OPINION
OF
THE
BOARD
(by
Mr.
Duinelle):
This
matter
comes
before
the
Board
on
a
Petition
for
Variance
filed
on
June
17,
1975
by
Mr.
Arlan
R.
Johnson
(Petitioner).
Petitioner
seeks variance to construct an extension of an 8—inch sanitary sewer
to hook up a new home owned by Mr. and Mrs. Dale Bailliez onto
the Hanna City,. Illinois sewage treatment system.
The variance is
necessary due to the fact that the Hanna City plant has been on
Agency restricted status since early in 1974.
The Agency filed its Recommendation on October 14, 1976 after
the Petition had been
amended
by additional information on August 2,
1976.
No hearing has been held in this matter.
The Agency Recommends
that the instant Petition be denied.
The Board has reviewed the information suhuitted, including
the letter filed by Mr. and Mrs. Bailliez on October 20, 1976
and finds that compliance with Rule 962(a) of the Board’s Water
Regulations would place upon Mr. and Mrs. Bailliez an arbitrary
or unreasonable hardship.
Order was entered October 28,
1976.
In this case the hardship upon Mr. Johnson has been primarily
self-imposed by building homes in an area under restricted status
since early 1974.
Construction was not even begun until July 26,
1976.
The Petition states that the Hanna City Sewage Treatment Plant
should be rehabilitated by December of 1977.
At that time it is
presumed that the current restricted status’ will be lifted.
The
hardship, then, upon which this variance was requested is a delayed
24—241
—2—
hook—up.
Mr.
~ohru;un
h~i~
no~ duionri
rd
(‘(1
t:trit
thi
1i~irdshi~,
upon
himself
is
either
arbitrary
or
unreasonable
when
weighed
aaainst
the necessity
of
rnaintaininq
the
integrity
of
a
restricted
status.
However,
the Board does find that an unreasonable hardship would
result to the Bailliez family 1~this variance were denied.
Denial
of
a variance would force Mr. and Mrs. Bailliez
to spend up
to
$2,000.00
for
a septic tank or holding tank to act as
a
temporary
measure until
the restricted status is
lifted.
Further, Mr. and
Mrs. Bailliez
have
already sold their present home and may have
to vacate
in early November,
In finding an unreasonable hardship
to exist
in this case,
the Board is acting upon the particular
facts
and circumstances presented by this cause.
The Agency has chosen
not to rebut any of
the
statement made in the Bailliez letter
filed October
20,
1976.
Further,
the Board
is not aware of any
facts which require the conclusion that the self-imposed nature
of Mr. Johnson~shardship must necessarily he inputed
to Mr. and
Mrs. Bailliez.
To do so the Board would have
to assume that
Mr. and Mrs.
Bailliez were fully aware of the fact that they were
taking the risk of not having a home to
live in until
1978 or
having
to pay $2,00O~0O (two months income)
for a system which
will
be abandoned
in I978~
This Oninion constitutes the Board~sfindinqs of fact and
conclusions of
law,
I,
Christan
L. Moffett,
Clerk of the Illinois
Pollution C
ntrol
Board, hereby certify the above Opinion was adopted on the
J~
day
of
November,
1976
by
a
vote of
~
_____
Christan L. Moffett~~erk
Illinois Pollution ~i’itrol Board
24
—
242