ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
July 8, 1976
CITY OF LINCOLN,
)
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 76—110
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent.
OPINION AND
ORDER
OF THE BOARD
(by Mr. Young):
This matter comes before the Board on the variance petition
filed April 23, 1976 by the City of Lincoln seeking relief from
Rule 602(d) (3)
of Chapter
3:
Water Pollution Rules and Regula-
tions.
An Agency Recommendation was filed with the Board on June
1,
1976.
Rule 602(d) (3) establishes a compliance date of December
31,
1975
for Rule 602(c), which requires in part that all combined
sewer overflows shall be given sufficient treatment to prevent
pollution or a violation of applicable water quality standards.
The City of Lincoln is engaged in the collection,
treatment
and disposal of wastewater within the City and approximately two-
thirds of all sewered portions of the City
is served by combined
sewers.
The treatment plant has a design capacity of 2.5 MGD with
an average dry weather flow of 2.25 MGD.
All wastewater
in the
system is intercepted and subject to treatment at the plant to an
extent of from two and one—half to five times the average dry
weather flow.
The City’s NPDES permit contains a schedule for bringing the
combined sewer overflows into compliance
and the schedule keys all
dates
to those after which grant funds have become available.
Peti-
tioner has applied
for grant funds for upgrading its sewage treat-
ment facilities and for the treatment of combined sewer overflows.
Petitioner has been awarded Step
I and Step II funds for the sewage
plant improvements and has received Step
I funds
for the sewer
system evaluation survey.
Step II funds for the design of excess
flow treatmen? facilities,
including combined sewer overflows, will
not be awarded until an evaluation of the facilities plan is complete,
probably by December of 1976.
No Step III construction grant funds
have been awarded to Lincoln for either the treatment plant improve—
ments or for excess flow treatment facilities.
23 —47
—2—
The City of Lincoln alleges that
it has been working dili-
gently to bring its combined sewer overflows into compliance but
that delays caused by the administration of the grant program have
prevented Lincoln from presently attaining compliance with Rule
602(d) (3).
The City alleges an unreasonable and arbitrary hardship
would be placed upon Lincoln if it were forced to proceed with the
sewer and treatment plant improvements prior to obtaining assistance
from existing grant funds.
The Agency has recognized the fact that many municipalities
and sanitary districts throughout the State have not met and cannot
presently meet the December 31,
1975 compliance date as set by Rule
602(d) (3).
On December 22,
1975,
the Agency filed an Amended Peti-
tion for Regulatory Change
(R75—l5) with the Board specifically re-
questing that the date for complying with Rule 602(d) (3)
be extended
until July
1,
1977, provided a grant application had been filed be-
fore December 31,
1975.
Although the Board has not taken final
action on this proposal,
at its May 20, 1976 meeting,
the Board
authorized for publication a proposed final draft of the Rule change
which would adopt the substance of the Agency’s amendatory proposal.
The economic impact hearings have yet to be conducted in this matter.
In view of the foregoing,
the Board is disposed to grant the
City of Lincoln the relief requested.
We believe an arbitrary and
unreasonable hardship would be placed on the City by requiring the
massive capital outlays necessary for compliance without first
allowing the City to obtain assistance from existing grant
programs,
and particularly so when the City would be precluded from any reim-
bursement from State/Federal grant
funds
if the City were to proceed
in advance of a particular grant award
(The Clinton Sanitary District,
PCB 75—498;
the Sanitary District of Elgin, PCB 75—501).
This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and con-
clusions of law in this matter.
ORDER
1.
The City of Lincoln
is granted variance from the compliance
date for combined sewer overflows as established by Rule 602(d)
(3)
of the Water Pollution Rules and Regulations.
Such variance is
granted until July 1,
1977, or until the Board adopts an Amendment
to the Regulations in consideration of the Agency Regulatory Pro-
posal
(R75-l5)
,
whichever is
later.
2.
The City is required during this period to maintain optimum
operating efficiency and convey as much combined sewer flow to its
plant as
is possible.
23
—48
—3—
3.
This variance will immediately terminate if the City is
offered a grant during this period and the City does not respond
with appropriate action to bring it into compliance.
The City
will be required to submit its completed facilities plan by
December
1,
1976.
IT
IS SO ORDERED.
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were
adopted on the
‘v’’
day of
,
1976 by
a
vote of
~
Illinois Pollution C~
Board
23 —49