ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    June
    9,
    1977
    MOBIL OIL CORPORATION,
    Petitioner,
    V.
    )
    PCB 77-22
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr.
    Goodman):
    This matter is before the Board upon
    a Petition for Variance
    from Rule 406 of Chapter
    3 of the Board’s Regulations by Mobil Oil
    Corporation
    (Mobil)
    filed January 19,
    1977.
    In its Petition, Mobil
    contended in the alternative that Rule 406 does not apply to Mobil.
    On March
    31,
    1977 the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    (Agency)
    filed its Recommendation contending that Rule 406 did indeed
    apply to Mobil but recommending that Mobil be granted variance from
    Rule 406 for one year under certain conditions.
    On May 11, 1977
    Mobil filed a Motion to Vacate a Board Order setting hearing, and
    requesting an Order be entered based on the Agency’s Recommendation
    of March
    29,
    1977.
    Mobil also requested Leave
    to Withdraw those
    portions of the Petition which relate to the Rule determination.
    On
    May 26, 1977 the Board granted Mobil’s Motion to Vacate its prior
    Order setting the matter for hearing and granted Mobil’s request to
    withdraw certain parts of its Petition.
    Mobil’s Motion for an Order
    granting the Variance pursuant to the Agency’s Recommendation was
    taken with the case.
    The subject of this Petition is Mobil’s refining facility on
    the Des Plaines River at Joliet,
    Illinois.
    The refinery employs
    approximately 550 persons and has
    a rated capacity of 175,000 barrels
    of conventional
    fuels per day.
    Mobil uses Des Plaines
    River water
    for boiler feed, cooling tower make-up and once through
    (non—contact)
    cooling.
    Discharges include clean storm water, once through
    (non—
    contact)
    cooling water and process water which has been through the
    refinery’s waste water treatment facility.
    The waste water treatment
    25— 711

    facility utilizes activated sludge and clarification for waste water
    treatment.
    In support of its Variance Petition Mobil alleges that it has
    expended $1,250,000
    on ammonia reduction efforts resulting in a
    decrease in ammonia discharge levels by 50
    in the last four years,
    that its discharge conforms to best practical technology for all
    parameters and that,
    through recycling,
    its total effluent discharge
    has been
    reduced.
    These efforts have resulted in
    a very low treated
    discharge of about 15 gallons per barrel of crude processed.
    This
    low flow tends to increase the apparent concentration of pollutants.
    In addition Mobil alleges continuing efforts to reduce the ammonia
    discharge levels and that it
    is presently engaged in two research
    programs aimed at developing additional ammonia reduction techniques.
    Mobil wishes to discharge a monthly average of
    41 mg/l and a daily
    maximum of
    90 mg/l of ammonia nitrogen which, according
    to their
    figures, would increase ammonia nitrogen
    in the Des Plaines River by
    0.015 mg/i during normal flow and 0.048 mg/l during the 7—day,
    10-
    year low flow of 1.2 billion gallons per day.
    In its Recommendation,
    the Agency indicates that although the
    1.5 mg/i ammonia of water quality standard
    is being violated in the
    Des Plaines River,
    a grant of the variance at the levels requested by
    Mobil will have only
    a negligible environmental impact upon the River
    because of the huge dilution ratio
    (456:1)
    afforded.
    It
    is the
    Agency’s opinion that it would be an arbitrary and unreasonable hard-
    ship on Mobil to force the expenditure of its resources
    in an attempt
    to achieve what must be considered
    a negligible improvement
    in the
    quality
    of
    the
    Des
    Plaines
    River.
    The
    Agency
    therefore
    recommends
    that
    Mobil
    be
    granted
    a
    variance from Rule
    406 of Chapter
    3 for one
    year subject to a number of conditions including interim limits and
    continued research efforts
    in order to develop
    a program which will
    result
    in compliance with Rule
    406.
    The Board agrees with the Agency’s estimation of the situation.
    We
    find
    the
    prudent
    course
    to
    be
    to
    grant Mobil’s Petition for
    Variance
    and
    includo
    a
    requirement
    thrit
    it
    pursue
    research
    efforts
    with
    the
    oh~ect
    ive of
    final
    compl ianc~
    of
    1~iiie 40(
    in
    a
    reasonable
    manner.
    The
    Board
    shall
    therefore
    grant
    MoLt
    .1.
    variance
    from
    Rule
    406 for a period of one year subject to certain conditions.
    This
    Opinion
    constitutes
    the
    findings
    of
    fact
    and
    conclusions
    of law of the Board in this matter.

    —3—
    ORDER
    It is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that Mobil Oil
    Corporation be granted variance
    from Rule 406 of Chapter
    3 of the
    Board’s Regulations until July
    1,
    1978 for its refinery facility
    at Joliet,
    Illinois under the following conditions:
    1.
    Mobil’s ammonia nitrogen effluent discharge shall
    not exceed a monthly average discharge of 41 mg/i or
    a daily maximum of 90 mg/l.
    2.
    Mobil shall make a good faith effort to develop
    a
    program wl2xich will permit compliance with Rule 406 of
    the Board’s Regulations.
    3.
    Mobil shall provide the Agency with progress reports
    every two months including a statement of its efforts
    to
    develop a successful ammonia nitrogen compliance program.
    4.
    Within
    35 days of the adoption of this Order,
    the
    Mobil Oil Corporation shall execute and forward to both
    the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
    2200
    Churchill Road,
    Springfield,
    Illinois 62706 and the
    Pollution Control Board a Certification of Acceptance
    and agreement to be bound to all terms and conditions
    of
    this
    Order.
    The form of said certification shall be
    as
    follows:
    CERTIFICATION
    I
    (we),
    having
    read
    and
    fully
    under-
    standing the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in
    PCB 77—22 hereby accept said Order and agree to be bound by all of
    the terms and conditions thereof.
    SIGNED
    TITLE
    DATE
    Mr. Dumelle concurs.
    25
    713

    —4-.
    I,
    Christan
    L.
    Moffett,
    C1er~
    of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board,
    hereby
    certify
    the
    above
    Op~inion and
    Order
    were
    adopted
    on
    the
    day ~
    ____
    ,
    1977
    by
    a
    vote
    of
    ~
    p
    Christan
    L.
    Moffe
    Clerk
    Illinois Pollutio
    ontrol Board
    25
    714

    Back to top