ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April 28,
1977
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Complainant,
)
v.
)
PCB 73—286
CITY OF
CHICAGO,
)
Respondent.
MR. MICHAEL A.
BENEDETTO, Assistant Attorney General, appeared
on behalf of the Complainant;
MR. HENRY WEBER, Assistant Corporation Counsel,
appeared on behalf
of the Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr.
Dumelle):
This matter comes before the Board on a second Stipulation,
submitted by the parties on March 11, 1977.
The Complaint in
this matter was
filed against the City of Chicago on July
13,,
1973.
A hearing was held on June 11,
1976 at which a Stipulation
was submitted.
On September 30, 1976 the Board rejected the
Stipulation and remanded this action back to the hearing officer
(EPA v. City of Chicago, PCB 73-286, ____PCB
).
The
Opinion is hereby incorporated by reference.
The Board’s
reason for rejecting the first stipulation was the lack of
information on the current compliance status of
the six furnaces
which comprise the City’s Calumet Incinerator located at 103rd
and Doty Avenue, Chicago, Cook County, Illinois.
A second
hearing was held on March 11,
1977.
The March 11,
1977 Stipulation remedies the inadequacy
of the June 11,
1976 Stipulation.
Briefly,
the Stipulation
states that Furnaces #1,
2,
3,
4,
and
6 are presently in
compliance.
Further, Furnace #5 is presently not being operated,
pending improvements to its scrubber.
Upon the completion
of its repair work, the City will apply for a permit from the
Agency.
If a permit is denied,
the City agrees to abandon
further use of Furnace #5.
The Board finds this proposal to be
acceptable and will approve the March 11,
1977 Stipulation.
25
—
345
—2—
The remaining issue is the size of any penalty to be
imposed for the admitted violations of Air Pollution Regulation
103(b) (2)
requiring operating permits, and the emission
standards of Air Pollution Regulation 3—3.232.
The Board’s
September 30,
1976 Opinion in this matter sets forth considera-
tion of the reasonableness of these emissions and of the
failure to obtain Agency permits.
The Board finds that while a penalty would normally be
appropriate for such violations as have been herein admitted,
such a penalty, under the particular circumstances of this
case would not, on balance, be useful to aid in the enforcement
of the Act
and with the fact that the Calumet Incinerator is now
apparently in compliance with the Air Pollution Regulations the
Board finds that the Stipulation in this matter should be accepted
and no penalty assessed.
This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact
and conclusions of law.
ORDER
1.
Respondent City of Chicago is hereby found
to have
violated Air Pollution Regulations 3—3.232
(Old Regulations) and
103(b) (2)
at its facility known as the Calumet Incinerator.
2.
Respondent shall adhere to the compliance program
for Furnace #5 as set forth in the Stipulation
(which is
hereby incorporated and adopted by reference as
if fully set
forth herein)
and at the March 11,
1977 hearing
(pages
7,
8).
a.
Until the stated repairs are made, Furnace #5
shall not be operated.
b.
Upon completion of repair work, and a 90-day
test run,
the City shall apply to the Agency for an
operating permit.
c.
If the permit application is denied the City shall
cease operation of Furnace
#5
as soon as alternative means
are available for the disposal of that refuse, but not
later than August
1, 1977.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Christan
L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were adopted on the
-,
day of April,
1977 by a vote of
~
Christan L. Moffett, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
25
—
346