ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    March 28,
    1977
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Complainant,
    v.
    )
    PCB 76—315
    VILLAGE OF LIVINGSTON,
    a municipal corporation,
    )
    Respondent.
    Mr. Patrick J.
    Chesley, Assistant Attorney General, Attorney
    for Complainant
    Mr. John Chalovich,
    appeared on behalf of Respondent
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Young):
    This matter comes before the Board on the Complaint filed
    on December
    9,
    1976, by the Environmental Protection Agency
    charging that the Village of Livingston has owned and operated
    its public water supply from February 21,
    1976 through the
    filing of the Complaint without a properly certified water
    supoly operator in violation of Section
    1 of an Act to
    Regulate the Operation of a Public Water Supply System,
    Ill.
    Rev.
    Stat.
    1975,
    Ch. ill 1/2, par.
    501
    (Certification
    Statute).
    A hearing was held in Edwardsville on January 25,
    1977.
    The Village of Livingston, with a population of approxi-
    mately 1000 peonle, owns and operates a public water su~ply
    including one well,
    a 100,000 gallon storage tank,
    and a
    distribution system.
    The well water
    is
    aerated, chlorinated,
    settled and filtered prior
    to discharge into
    the
    distribution
    systern.
    Section
    1 of the Certification Statute requires any
    public water supply system utilizing aeration and filtration
    to have in its employ at least one natural person certified
    as comoetent as a Class A or B water supply operator.
    On the basis of Respondent’s Answer to the Request for
    Admission of Facts
    (Exh.
    *2)
    as well as the admissions made
    at the hearing,
    there can be no doubt that the violation
    occurred.
    To mitigate the violation,
    Respondent contended
    25
    215

    —2—
    it made every reasonable effort to comply and that the viola-
    tion resulted solely from Respondent’s misunderstanding re-
    garding the certification requirements.
    After the resignation
    of their water superintendent on February 21, 1976,
    the Village
    hired an uncertified operator, Bob Martintoni,
    to perform the
    work required at the water supply.
    As soon as the required
    classes were offered, Mr. Martintoni enrolled therein so that
    the proper certification could be obtained.
    Because the
    Village had followed this same procedure in 1973 when it hired
    the operator whose resignation precipitated
    this entire matter
    (R.
    35), Mr. John Chalovich,
    Mayor of Livingston,
    thought
    that the Village was in full compliance with the requirements.
    Although the Agency mailed a Notice of Violation
    (Exh.
    #3)
    to the Respondent on March
    5, 1976, both the Mayor and the
    Village Clerk, Mrs.
    Linda Rensing, deny that it was ever received
    by the Village
    (R.
    31, 32).
    Mrs.
    Rensing did testify,
    however,
    that the Village was directed to employ a properly certified
    operator by Mr. Ed Kane of the Agency’s Collinsville Office
    some 90 days prior
    to the filing of the Complaint herein
    (R. 48).
    The record
    is silent as
    to why Mr. Kane’s directions were not
    followed until after
    the Complaint was
    filed.
    At about the time the Complaint herein was filed,
    the
    Agency issued
    a press release concerning the Village’s water
    supply which allegedly listed two methods of compliance satis-
    factory to the Agency,
    one of which was that the Village could
    comply by training a present employee to pass a written examina-
    tion offered by the Agency
    (Exh.
    #4).
    With this knowledge and
    knowing
    that a Complaint had been filed,
    the Mayor called the
    Agency for explanation.
    He was informed that the press release
    was in error and that the only method of compliance was to hire
    a properly certified operator, a step which the Village immediately
    followed by hiring
    a properly certified operator within
    10 days
    thereof
    (R. 13).
    Section
    23 of the Certification Statute requires the
    imposition
    of a penalty of not less than
    $300.00
    nor more than
    $1,000.00 for each violation of Section
    1 found by the Board.
    In consideration of the entire record in this matter and in
    accordance with Section 23, the Board will assess the minimum
    penalty of $100.00
    for the violation of Section
    1 found herein.
    The Board notes that even though Respondent received notice of
    the violation some
    90 days prior to the filing of the Complaint
    herein,
    Respondent delayed until after the Complaint was
    filed
    herein before initiating corrective action.
    The Board has also
    considered the effect of the Agency’s erroneous press release
    and concludes that although this was indeed an unfortunate cir-
    cumstance,
    absent any showing of detrimental reliance, and none
    was shown,
    this circumstance alone is of little benefit to
    Respondent’ s case.
    25
    216

    —3—
    This Opinion constitutes the Board’s
    findings of fact and
    conclusions of law in this matter.
    ORDER
    The Village of Livingston is found to have operated its
    public water supply in violation of Section
    1 of the Certification
    Statute and is assessed a penalty of $100.00
    for such violation.
    Penalty payment by certified check or money order payable to the
    State of Illinois shall be made within
    35 days of the date of
    this Order to:
    Fiscal Services Division,
    Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency,
    2200 Churchill Road, Springfield,
    Illinois,
    62706.
    IT
    IS SO ORDERED.
    I,
    Christan
    L.
    Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby certify the abovç Opinion and Order were
    adopted on the
    ~
    day of
    ___________________,
    1977 by
    a vote of.~ô
    Christan L. Moffê~ Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    25
    217

    Back to top