~1~OIS
    POLLUTION
    CONTROL
    BOARD
    December
    20,
    1977
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENC~,
    Compiainar~~,
    V.
    )
    PCB 77—123
    PAUL STARCHEVICH, JR., MILDRED L.
    STARCHEVICH, FOUR NINE FOUR
    CORPORATION,
    a Missouri Corporation,
    and PAUL’S IGA FOOD-LINER,
    INC.,
    an
    Illinois Corporation,
    Respondents.
    -
    and
    -
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Complainant,
    v.
    )
    PCB
    77—148
    CC~SOLIDATED
    PAUL STARCHEVICH,
    JR., MILDRED L.
    STARCHEVICH and ELEANOR LEEPER,
    )
    Respondents.
    JOHN VAN VRANKEN, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, APPEARED ON BEHALF
    OF
    COMPLAINANT;
    GARY E. BARNHART OF CLAUDON, ELSON, LLOYD
    & BARNHART, LTD.,
    APPEARED
    ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENTS PAUL STARCHEVICH JR., MILDRED L.
    STARCHEVICH, ELEANOR LEEPER, AND PAUL’S TCA FOOD-LINER,
    INC.;
    RONALD WEBER OF FROEHLING,
    TAYLOR
    & WEBER APPEARED ON BEHALF OF
    RESPONDENT FOUR NINE FOUR CORPORATION.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Goodman):
    This matter comes before the Board upon two Complaints filed
    by the Environmental Prote~tionAgency
    (Agency).
    PCB 77-123,
    filed May 2,
    1977,
    charges Paul Starchevich,
    Jr., Mildred
    L.
    Starchevich and Four Nine Four Corporation
    (Four Nine Four) with
    28
    457

    violations of Rules
    9
    ‘i
    952(a)
    953(a)
    of
    Pollution and Section
    ~i:
    of the Environment
    (Act).
    The Complaint was anerded on
    August
    9,
    IGA Food-liner,
    Incorporat.
    I
    ..
    s,
    Inc.)
    as
    PCB
    77—148,
    filed
    June
    2,
    197i
    -
    rges
    Paul
    S
    Mildred
    L.
    Starchevich
    and
    Ele
    Leeper with
    of
    Chapter
    3 and the Act,
    A
    I
    g was held
    At the hearing,
    a motion
    wh.L.
    was
    brough
    consolidate these actions was gran
    ed by the
    H
    (R.5
    &
    6).
    Under
    Procedural
    Ruie
    09,
    only
    th
    to consolidate adjudicative claimn
    Therefore
    Board
    grants
    the
    motion
    and
    consoL~dates
    PCB
    7
    for
    decision.
    Respondents
    Starche~±ch,
    Leeper,
    motion
    to
    dismiss
    is
    hereby
    denied
    (R.74).
    A request for Admission of icts
    was
    made
    Starchevich and Four Nine Four
    ~
    Respondents
    June
    1,
    1977.
    Four Nine
    Four
    d to file a
    Board.
    Pursuant to Procedural
    t.
    314(c),
    ea
    fact raised in the request to
    Nine Four
    as admitted.
    nr
    3:
    Water
    Lotection Act
    to
    add Paul’s
    ty
    Respondent.
    .evich,
    Jr.,
    name
    violations
    c.ptember
    1,
    1977.
    v the
    Agency
    to
    ng
    Officer
    ~nard
    has authority
    at
    this time the
    ~a
    and PCB 77-148
    id
    Paul’s Inc.,
    f
    Mr. and Mrs.
    .n PCB 77—123,
    on
    esponse with the
    of the
    matters of
    ‘e,
    Ex.
    2)
    are
    taken
    In
    1973,
    a
    retail
    grocLr
    ere
    located
    ir Farmington,
    Fulton
    County,
    Illinois was construc~a aud subsequen
    l.y
    owned and operated
    by
    Paul’s,
    Inc.
    Sewer service
    wa~
    provided
    by
    ~onstruction
    of
    an
    8—inch line connected to the
    Farri
    gton
    sewer
    ntem,
    Agency
    per-
    mits were not required for constru
    tion or
    ope.
    ~ion
    of this sewer
    line because of the Rule 951(b)
    (2)
    exemption.
    The
    Farmington sewer
    system and STP were on restricted status at this time.
    Ownership
    of the building, surrounding land, and the sewer line passed to
    Mr.
    and
    Mrs.
    Starchevich
    on
    or
    about
    December
    19,
    1976
    and
    Paul’s,
    Inc. was dissolved on or about
    January
    18,
    1977.
    Two additional connections were made to
    the 8-inch line:
    a
    Ben Franklin store owned by Four Nine Four on July
    22, 1977 and
    the Shad Hill marketplace owned by Leeper on or about March
    18,
    1977.
    No Agency Construction or Operating Permits were received for these
    connections.
    In fact,
    no permit application was even made until
    May 24, 1977
    (R.EPA).
    Paul’s,
    Inc. was paid $1,000 for the Ben
    Franklin connection
    (R.l4,
    93), and Paul Starchevich was paid
    $1,000 for the Shad Hill connection
    (R.l5).
    The existence of these
    connections
    is established beyond doubt from the testimony of Paul
    Starchevich (R.13,
    15,
    87), Eleanor Leeper
    (R.21) and Agency in-
    spector Lyle A.
    Ray
    (R.28-9,
    71) and the unanswered Request for
    Admissions.
    28
    458

    —3—
    All ResponcLe.~n
    ..~
    aware before the fac
    these connec-
    tions to the the
    8-1
    3e\qe
    line would
    requa
    -
    cy permits.
    Four Nine Four and
    LL
    .cacelved
    such notifi
    -
    by
    mail in
    May,
    1976
    (See Ex.
    4
    an~
    ~)
    and
    Paul Starchev
    s
    notified
    verbally by Ray at the
    tir
    .
    -
    Ben Frankli
    ~tion
    (R.3l—
    33,
    51).
    Following not1fi~
    -.
    Paul Starc
    ,
    the Ben
    Franklin line was disconnect~
    ..
    was reconne
    -
    pproximately
    one week later at the reques.
    ur Nine Fou
    92-3).
    The evidence presented
    at
    U.
    hearing
    is
    -,
    Icient to find
    violations of Rules 951(a)
    and
    91~
    a) ofChapt
    ~.
    The contention
    by Respondents that the additiona
    connections
    under the Rule
    951(b) (2)
    exemption is wholly
    unfo~nded.
    Once
    ose
    connections
    were made,
    the 8—inch line became ~ sewer exte
    ~ rather than a
    service connection and the exempti
    )fl
    no longei
    tied.
    Respond-
    ents therefore “caused or allowed”
    the construction
    ct±~
    ~“-~eration
    of a sewer requiring a permit wit
    li~ut
    the requisite permit,
    in vio-
    lation of Rules
    951(a) and 952(a’
    A violation of Rule 953(a
    Chapter
    3 w
    not shown in the
    record.
    The buildings involved
    e are neith
    treatment works,
    pretreatment works or wastewat~
    urces
    as
    de~ned
    in Rule 104.
    In regard to the Ben
    Fra~,
    connection,
    the
    Board finds the
    following violations of Cha:t
    ..
    and the Act.
    Paul’s, Inc.
    is
    in
    violation of Rules
    951(a),
    cn
    ..ny
    22, 1976,
    9.52(a)
    from July 22,
    1976 until December 18,
    1976 and
    .
    ereby Secti
    12(b).
    Four Nine
    Four is
    in violation of Rules
    95.
    .)
    on July 2
    1976 and 952(a)
    from July 22,
    1976 until August
    9,
    1977
    aiici th
    ~by Section 12(b).
    Paul Starchevich and Mildred
    L.
    Starchevich ar~
    in
    violation of
    Rule 952(a)
    and Section 12(b)
    from December 18,
    1976
    until
    August
    9,
    1977.
    In regard to the Shad Hill connection,
    the Board finds
    Paul Starchevich,
    Jr., Mildred
    L. Starchevich
    nnd
    Eleanor Leeper
    in violation of Rules
    951(a),
    on
    or
    about March
    18,
    1977,
    952(a)
    from on or about March 18,
    1977 until June
    2,
    1977 and thereby
    Section 12 (b).
    The Board has considered the Section
    33(c)
    factors
    in assessing
    a penalty for these violations.
    Respondents have the burden of
    producing evidence concerning these factors.
    Processing and Books,
    Inc.
    v. Pollution Control Board,
    64 Ill.
    2nd 68,
    351 N.E. 2nd 865
    (1976).
    The character and degree of injury consists primarily of
    damage to the integrity of a restricted status and the need for a
    viable permit system.
    In addition, a citizen witness testified
    that the area of the city surrounding the connection of the 8-inch
    line into the city sewer system has experienced an overflow problem.
    The businesses have social and economic value as a source of income
    and employment.
    The suitdbility of the three buildings to their
    location was clearly established,
    28
    459

    —4—
    The fourth factor,
    technical
    feasibility and economic reason-
    ableness, was discussed
    in greater detail.
    One engineer testified
    that
    there
    was no difference
    in
    environmental impact between sepa-
    rate service connections with city
    sewers and connecting into the
    existing 8-inch line
    (R.127-8).
    Mrs. Leeper presented evidence
    of great difficulty in building a direct service connection
    (R.107-lll).
    Finally, imposition of a cease and desist order would
    hamper operations at the Ben Franklin store and the Shad Hili
    marketplace.
    The weight of this evidence, however,
    is gr~at1y
    diminished by the fact that any hardship is self-imposed due to
    the Respondent’s failure to avail themselves of Board variance pro-
    ceedings,
    of which they were aware
    (See
    EXe
    4 and 5).
    In aidition,
    the City of Farmington was placed on restricted status several years
    before construction on the Ben Franklin and Shad Hill
    facilities
    was
    begun.
    Based on these factors,
    the Board imposes a penalty of $1,000
    against Paul’s,
    Inc.,
    $1,000 against Paul Starchevich, Jr. and
    Mildred
    L. Starchevich who are jointly and severally liable for its
    payment,
    $750 against Four Nine Four
    and
    $500
    against
    Eleanor
    Leeper.
    The
    Board
    orders
    the Respondents
    to
    cease and desist all vio-
    lations
    of the permit requirements
    within
    180 days.
    All necessary
    Agency permits must be obtained
    within
    that
    time
    period.
    This Opinion and Order
    constitute
    the findings of fact and
    conclusions of law of the
    Board.
    ORDER
    It is the Order of the Pollution Control Board
    that:
    1.
    Paul Starchevich, Jr., Mildred
    L.. Starchevich, Eleanor
    Leeper,
    Four Nine Four Corporation and Paul’s IGA Food-liner, Inc.
    are
    in violation of Rules 951(a)
    and 952(a)
    of Chapter
    3 and the~-e—
    by Section
    12(b)
    of the Act.
    2.
    The above Respondents shall cease and desist fro~iall
    aforementioned violations of the Act and Regulations within 180
    days of the date of this Order.
    3.
    For the above violations,
    a penalty in the amounts listed
    below shall be paid:
    Paul Starchevich, Jr. and Mildred L. Starchevich,
    jointly and severally liable
    $1,000.00
    28
    460

    Eleanor Lee .ei’
    Four Nine Fo
    —5—
    dorporation
    Paul’s
    IGA Food—
    ‘no
    incorporated
    Payment
    shall be made wit~in
    d
    certified check or money
    orde~
    .e
    1~O~
    -
    ~s
    of
    the
    date
    of
    1&~
    Order
    by
    State
    of I~jn~
    Fiscal
    Service
    Division
    Illinois
    Envii~
    imental
    Protecti~
    Agency
    2200
    Churchill
    Road
    Springfield, 1~linois
    62706
    I, Christan
    L, Moffett,
    Clerk of
    the Illinois
    P~12~tion
    Control
    Board,
    hereby
    certif
    inion
    and Order wet~a~opted
    on
    the
    c~0h
    day ~
    1977 by a
    vote of ~-O
    Illinois Pol1ut~
    ,.Control Board
    28
    461

    Back to top