ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
July 7, 1977
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Complainant,
v.
)
PCB 77—157
DECATUR SANITARY DISTRICT, A. E. STALEY
MANUFACTURING CO., and ARCHER-DANIELS-
MIDLAND CO.,
Respondents.
DISSENTING OPINION (by Mr. Young):
On July 7, 1977, the Board denied by a vote of 4-1, a
Motion by Respondent Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (A-D-M)
to Dismiss Count II of the Complaint.
Count II alleges that the Respondent A-D-M discharged
organic wastes to the sewers in such quantities and of such
nature to cause the Decatur Sanitary District sewage treatment
facility to become overloaded and caused a violation of the
District’s effluent limitations and caused or contributed to
the presence of operational odors in violation of Rule 701(a)
of Chapter 3.
In the Board Opinion of March 7, 1972 (3 PCB 755), which
was the adopting Opinion in R70-8, R71-l4, and R71-20, the Board
at 3 PCB 775 made the following comment:
“Part VII contains minimum limits on discharges
to sewers, designed to protect treatment works aqainst
hd rm tihat
mi
qht cause viola Lion ol ci 1iuenL or waLer
quality standards. We have added language suggested
by Dr. Pipes to protect against hazards to sewage plant
personnel and against discharge of materials that will
go through the plant without treatment and cause
effluent violations.”
This statement and the transcript
of the hearings which led to
the adoption of Rule 701 establish without doubt the intent
of the Board in promulgating Rule 701(a).
The allegations
of
Count II of the Complaint would not
constitute a violation of
701(a)
even
if
proven because the material allegedly discharged
to the sewer clearly falls outside of that Rule.
—2—
The Motion to Dismiss by Respondent A-D-M should be
granted.
J~es L. Young
4~4
I, Chtistan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify the above Dissenting Opinion
was submitted to me on the
/.~Y~’day
of July, 1977.
cAL~
Christan L. M ff
~4I~
Clerk
Illinois Pollutio ontrol Board