ILLINO:I POLLUTION
CONTROL BOARD
November 23,
1977
CITY OF CANTON,
Petitioner,
V.
)
PCB 77—234
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent,
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE
BOARD
(by Mr. Young):
This matter comes before the Board on a variance petition
filed on September 14,
1977,
by the City o~fCanton seeking
relief from certain provisions of Chapter
III of the Water
Pollution Regulations
as applied to the effluent from the
City~sEast Side Sewage Treatment Plant.
Specifically,
variance is requested from Rule
203(c),
as that rule applies
to phosphorus, and from Rule 203(f)
insofar as that rule
applies to ammonia nitrogen.
On October 17,
1977,
the Agency
filed a Recommendation favorable to the grant of the variance
after imposition of certain conditions;
the City has waived
hearing in this matter.
The Petition alleges that the variance is necessary to
relieve the City from meeting the water quality standard
of l~5mg/l for ammonia nitrogen and 0.05 mg/l
for phosphorus.
From this the Board must assume that those standards are not
presently achieved either in Duck Creek, which receives the
plant effluent, or in an unnamed strip mine lake of approxi-
mately
11 acres which receives the flow from Duck Creek.
Rule
203(c)
provides
that phosphorus ~s P shall
not exceed
O~O5mg/i
in any stream at the point where the stream enters
any reservoir or
lake.
The effluent from current plant opera-
tion discharges phosphorus ranqing in concentration from
3 to
8 mg/i
(Pet.
1).
Rule
203(f)
requires that a 1.5 mq/l concentration of ammonia
nitrogen
(as
N)
shall not be exceeded in the waters of the State,
except
for certain exce?tions not applicable here.
The effluent
from current plant operation discharges ammonia nitrogen ranging
in concentrations
from
3 to
8 mg/l
(Pet.
1).
28
—
273
—2—
Rule
402
of
Chapter
3
requires
that
no
effluent
shall,
alone
or
in
combination
with
other
sources,
cause
a
violation
of
any
applicable
water
quality standard.
In those instances where
the
water
quality
standard for a particular constituant is
exceeded in a receiving body of water, any discharge
of that
constituent
to thai ~y
of water must meet the water quality
standard,
as
an
ef~1Li~nt limitation,
unless
a
variance
has
been granted pursuar~ttx
Title
9 of the Environmental Protection
Act.
The existing Ea~~Side Sewage Treatment Plant was improved
during 1974
to 1976 to include a new package contact stabiliza-
tion plant, new tt~,
$ettling lagoons, aerobic digestion
and sludge drying be4s c~pableof treating a design flow of
0.5 MGD with an influent BOD5 strength of 205 mg/l
(Pet.
1,
2).
These improvements ao
n~t
provide the capability to remove
ammonia nitrogen to a~concentrationof 1.5 mg/l or phosphorus
to 0.05 mg/l and the City of Canton has submitted
a plan of
study to the Agency ~
iaratory to a Step
1 grant to determine
the nature and extent ~of further plant modifications necessary
to meet existing stai~idards (Pet.
2).
Because regulatory changes
which may result in modification of both the ammonia nitrogen
(R77-6)
and phospho~u~(R76-l)
water quality standard or effluent
limitation are curr?ntly in hearing before the Board, the Peti-
tioner
(Pet.
3-5)
and the Agency
(Rec.
4)
submit that requiring
the Petitioner to meet the existing requirements during the
pendency of the regulatory proposals would constitute an arbitrary
and unreasonable hardship.
The Petitioner further submits
that
the City is presently financially incapable of financing the
additional
facilities required without grant assistance
(Pet.
3).
The Board has previously granted a number of petitions for
variances
in which re1~efwas sought from the requirement to
remove phosphorus to the 0.05 mg/l level finding that such
practice is technically, feasible but economically unreasonable.
City of Hoopeston,
PCB 76-234,
24 PCB 441; Southern Illinois
University at Edwardsville, PCB 77-111,
25 PCB 775; Valley Water
Company,
Inc., PC~7~—i46,25 PCB 289; y~i~9eof_Deland, PCB
77—193
(September 15,
1977); Village of Beecher
Cit_y, PCB 77—194
(September
15, l977).~ As in the cases cited,
the Board
finds
here that the Petitior~erwould suffer an arbitrary or unreasonable
hardship if required to meet the 0.05 mg/l phosphorus limitation
and will therefore grant the relief requested.
The Agency Recommendation at page
4 states that the Petitioner’s
facilities are not currently capable of consistently achieving
removal
of ammonia nitrogen to a concentration of 1.5 mg/l.
In
support of the regulatory proposal
(R77-6)
to modify the ammonia
nitrogen regulations, ihe Agency stated that they had found,
during the past seve~atyears,
no practical, environmentally
acceptable method forammonia
reduction which will assure con-
tinuous compliance
w1~h
the 1.5 mg/l ammonia nitrogen standard
(Pet.
3).
In view ~bf~the foregoing,
the Board will grant the
28
—
274
-‘-3—
i~C~reeua;ted fir’~nqthat to require the Petitioner
to
rate here whai, the ;\aency has undertaken
to demonstrate
~rort
their prono~~l ~or modificatioc o
the regulations
iid be unreason ~
~‘,
~n view of t’o regulatory proceeding.
C’
C;
minion constitutes
the Board’s
findincu; of fact and
ja’~oris
of law in this matter.
ORDER
1.
The City of Canton is granted a variance for its East
Saiaqe rrreatmeflt Plant from Rules
203(c)
and 402 of Chapter
‘:
Nater Pollution,
of the Board’s Rules
a~’d Regulations
re—
err uhosohorus until November
23,
1982,
subject fo the
‘-H
te”Hncj
conditions:
a)
This variance will earlier terminate upon
adoption by the Board of any modification
of
the existing phosphorus water quality
standards and effluent limitations and the
City shall comnly with such revised
ogula-
tions
on adootion hr the Board.
The City of Canton
is granted a van arce for its East
Fr-wage
‘Treatment Plant from Rules
20~(t)
aid 402 or Chapter
~-e~
Pollution, of the Board~sRules
and
Regulations re—
re i~-armenia nitro en until December
31,
978,
subject
to the
nq
conditions:
a)
This variance will earlier terminate upon
adoption hr th-~Board of any modification
o
the
existinq
ammonia
nitrogen
water
quality standards and effluent limitations
and the City shall comply with such revised
~-‘eoulationson adootion by the Board.
b)
In the event that grant
funds
bcco’:~
availahle
r
i II
(
‘1
‘11
I
Ii
I
‘~~-~i’
I
(
i
111/
h~,;I1t
,‘e
~‘‘~‘~I
1)11
O(
1”
W~
I
r;
‘V
1
5
1 Cli
I
(1
I
I
I
I
d
I
tIll
of equinment for the removal of
c’;’monia
nitro—
c;en which will orovide the
bosl’
piric4icahle
treatment technology for the removal
of
ammonia
nitrogen over the life of the
works.
c)
During the
nod
of this variance,
the City
shall operate the East Side Sewage Treatment
Plant
to achieve the minimum discharge of
ammonia
nitrogen
consistent
wi tb
the
cape—
bilities of the existing equipment and process.
28
—
275
—4—
3.
Within
35 days
of
the date of this Order,
the Petitioner
shall
submit to the Manager,
Variance
Section,
Division
of
Water
Pollution Control,
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
2200 Churchill
Road,
Springfield,
Illinois,
62706, an executed
Certification of Acceptance and Agreement to be bound to all
terms and conditions of this variance.
The form of said certi-
fication shall be as follows:
CERTIFICATION
I,
(We), ___________________________
having read
the Order of the Pollution Control Board
in
PCB 77-234,
understand and accept said Order,
realizind
that such
acceptance renders all terms and conditions thereto
binding and enforceable.
SIGNED
TICLE
DATE
IT
IS SO ORDERED.
I, Chnistan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Con-
trol Board, ~ereby
certify the above Opinion and Order were adopted
on the ~
day of
______—,
1977
by
a vote of~5_~
Chnistan
L.
Moffett~~,içlerk
Illinois Pollution (9’b~itrolBoard
28
—
276