ILLINO:I POLLUTION
    CONTROL BOARD
    November 23,
    1977
    CITY OF CANTON,
    Petitioner,
    V.
    )
    PCB 77—234
    ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Respondent,
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE
    BOARD
    (by Mr. Young):
    This matter comes before the Board on a variance petition
    filed on September 14,
    1977,
    by the City o~fCanton seeking
    relief from certain provisions of Chapter
    III of the Water
    Pollution Regulations
    as applied to the effluent from the
    City~sEast Side Sewage Treatment Plant.
    Specifically,
    variance is requested from Rule
    203(c),
    as that rule applies
    to phosphorus, and from Rule 203(f)
    insofar as that rule
    applies to ammonia nitrogen.
    On October 17,
    1977,
    the Agency
    filed a Recommendation favorable to the grant of the variance
    after imposition of certain conditions;
    the City has waived
    hearing in this matter.
    The Petition alleges that the variance is necessary to
    relieve the City from meeting the water quality standard
    of l~5mg/l for ammonia nitrogen and 0.05 mg/l
    for phosphorus.
    From this the Board must assume that those standards are not
    presently achieved either in Duck Creek, which receives the
    plant effluent, or in an unnamed strip mine lake of approxi-
    mately
    11 acres which receives the flow from Duck Creek.
    Rule
    203(c)
    provides
    that phosphorus ~s P shall
    not exceed
    O~O5mg/i
    in any stream at the point where the stream enters
    any reservoir or
    lake.
    The effluent from current plant opera-
    tion discharges phosphorus ranqing in concentration from
    3 to
    8 mg/i
    (Pet.
    1).
    Rule
    203(f)
    requires that a 1.5 mq/l concentration of ammonia
    nitrogen
    (as
    N)
    shall not be exceeded in the waters of the State,
    except
    for certain exce?tions not applicable here.
    The effluent
    from current plant operation discharges ammonia nitrogen ranging
    in concentrations
    from
    3 to
    8 mg/l
    (Pet.
    1).
    28
    273

    —2—
    Rule
    402
    of
    Chapter
    3
    requires
    that
    no
    effluent
    shall,
    alone
    or
    in
    combination
    with
    other
    sources,
    cause
    a
    violation
    of
    any
    applicable
    water
    quality standard.
    In those instances where
    the
    water
    quality
    standard for a particular constituant is
    exceeded in a receiving body of water, any discharge
    of that
    constituent
    to thai ~y
    of water must meet the water quality
    standard,
    as
    an
    ef~1Li~nt limitation,
    unless
    a
    variance
    has
    been granted pursuar~ttx
    Title
    9 of the Environmental Protection
    Act.
    The existing Ea~~Side Sewage Treatment Plant was improved
    during 1974
    to 1976 to include a new package contact stabiliza-
    tion plant, new tt~,
    $ettling lagoons, aerobic digestion
    and sludge drying be4s c~pableof treating a design flow of
    0.5 MGD with an influent BOD5 strength of 205 mg/l
    (Pet.
    1,
    2).
    These improvements ao
    n~t
    provide the capability to remove
    ammonia nitrogen to a~concentrationof 1.5 mg/l or phosphorus
    to 0.05 mg/l and the City of Canton has submitted
    a plan of
    study to the Agency ~
    iaratory to a Step
    1 grant to determine
    the nature and extent ~of further plant modifications necessary
    to meet existing stai~idards (Pet.
    2).
    Because regulatory changes
    which may result in modification of both the ammonia nitrogen
    (R77-6)
    and phospho~u~(R76-l)
    water quality standard or effluent
    limitation are curr?ntly in hearing before the Board, the Peti-
    tioner
    (Pet.
    3-5)
    and the Agency
    (Rec.
    4)
    submit that requiring
    the Petitioner to meet the existing requirements during the
    pendency of the regulatory proposals would constitute an arbitrary
    and unreasonable hardship.
    The Petitioner further submits
    that
    the City is presently financially incapable of financing the
    additional
    facilities required without grant assistance
    (Pet.
    3).
    The Board has previously granted a number of petitions for
    variances
    in which re1~efwas sought from the requirement to
    remove phosphorus to the 0.05 mg/l level finding that such
    practice is technically, feasible but economically unreasonable.
    City of Hoopeston,
    PCB 76-234,
    24 PCB 441; Southern Illinois
    University at Edwardsville, PCB 77-111,
    25 PCB 775; Valley Water
    Company,
    Inc., PC~7~—i46,25 PCB 289; y~i~9eof_Deland, PCB
    77—193
    (September 15,
    1977); Village of Beecher
    Cit_y, PCB 77—194
    (September
    15, l977).~ As in the cases cited,
    the Board
    finds
    here that the Petitior~erwould suffer an arbitrary or unreasonable
    hardship if required to meet the 0.05 mg/l phosphorus limitation
    and will therefore grant the relief requested.
    The Agency Recommendation at page
    4 states that the Petitioner’s
    facilities are not currently capable of consistently achieving
    removal
    of ammonia nitrogen to a concentration of 1.5 mg/l.
    In
    support of the regulatory proposal
    (R77-6)
    to modify the ammonia
    nitrogen regulations, ihe Agency stated that they had found,
    during the past seve~atyears,
    no practical, environmentally
    acceptable method forammonia
    reduction which will assure con-
    tinuous compliance
    w1~h
    the 1.5 mg/l ammonia nitrogen standard
    (Pet.
    3).
    In view ~bf~the foregoing,
    the Board will grant the
    28
    274

    -‘-3—
    i~C~reeua;ted fir’~nqthat to require the Petitioner
    to
    rate here whai, the ;\aency has undertaken
    to demonstrate
    ~rort
    their prono~~l ~or modificatioc o
    the regulations
    iid be unreason ~
    ~‘,
    ~n view of t’o regulatory proceeding.
    C’
    C;
    minion constitutes
    the Board’s
    findincu; of fact and
    ja’~oris
    of law in this matter.
    ORDER
    1.
    The City of Canton is granted a variance for its East
    Saiaqe rrreatmeflt Plant from Rules
    203(c)
    and 402 of Chapter
    ‘:
    Nater Pollution,
    of the Board’s Rules
    a~’d Regulations
    re—
    err uhosohorus until November
    23,
    1982,
    subject fo the
    ‘-H
    te”Hncj
    conditions:
    a)
    This variance will earlier terminate upon
    adoption by the Board of any modification
    of
    the existing phosphorus water quality
    standards and effluent limitations and the
    City shall comnly with such revised
    ogula-
    tions
    on adootion hr the Board.
    The City of Canton
    is granted a van arce for its East
    Fr-wage
    ‘Treatment Plant from Rules
    20~(t)
    aid 402 or Chapter
    ~-e~
    Pollution, of the Board~sRules
    and
    Regulations re—
    re i~-armenia nitro en until December
    31,
    978,
    subject
    to the
    nq
    conditions:
    a)
    This variance will earlier terminate upon
    adoption hr th-~Board of any modification
    o
    the
    existinq
    ammonia
    nitrogen
    water
    quality standards and effluent limitations
    and the City shall comply with such revised
    ~-‘eoulationson adootion by the Board.
    b)
    In the event that grant
    funds
    bcco’:~
    availahle
    r
    i II
    (
    ‘1
    ‘11
    I
    Ii
    I
    ‘~~-~i’
    I
    (
    i
    111/
    h~,;I1t
    ,‘e
    ~‘‘~‘~I
    1)11
    O(
    1”
    W~
    I
    r;
    ‘V
    1
    5
    1 Cli
    I
    (1
    I
    I
    I
    I
    d
    I
    tIll
    of equinment for the removal of
    c’;’monia
    nitro—
    c;en which will orovide the
    bosl’
    piric4icahle
    treatment technology for the removal
    of
    ammonia
    nitrogen over the life of the
    works.
    c)
    During the
    nod
    of this variance,
    the City
    shall operate the East Side Sewage Treatment
    Plant
    to achieve the minimum discharge of
    ammonia
    nitrogen
    consistent
    wi tb
    the
    cape—
    bilities of the existing equipment and process.
    28
    275

    —4—
    3.
    Within
    35 days
    of
    the date of this Order,
    the Petitioner
    shall
    submit to the Manager,
    Variance
    Section,
    Division
    of
    Water
    Pollution Control,
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
    2200 Churchill
    Road,
    Springfield,
    Illinois,
    62706, an executed
    Certification of Acceptance and Agreement to be bound to all
    terms and conditions of this variance.
    The form of said certi-
    fication shall be as follows:
    CERTIFICATION
    I,
    (We), ___________________________
    having read
    the Order of the Pollution Control Board
    in
    PCB 77-234,
    understand and accept said Order,
    realizind
    that such
    acceptance renders all terms and conditions thereto
    binding and enforceable.
    SIGNED
    TICLE
    DATE
    IT
    IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Chnistan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Con-
    trol Board, ~ereby
    certify the above Opinion and Order were adopted
    on the ~
    day of
    ______—,
    1977
    by
    a vote of~5_~
    Chnistan
    L.
    Moffett~~,içlerk
    Illinois Pollution (9’b~itrolBoard
    28
    276

    Back to top