ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
November
10,
1977
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD,
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 77—239,
—240, —241
)
—242,
—243,
—244
—245,
—246, —247
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
CONSOLIDATED
Respondent.
INTERIM ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr. Goodman):
On September 29,
1977,
this E~ardentered an Interim Order
consolidating the above-captioned Permit Appeal Petitions,
and
granted Petitioner City of Springfield
21
days within which
to
amend those Petitions, placing in issue all reasons cited by the
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency for denying the relevant
Permit Applications.
On October 20,
1977,
Springfield filed an
Amendment to Permit Appeal Petitions
in response to our Interim
Order.
Springfield’s Amendment states that it contests the Agency’s
permit rejections
in the relevant cases,
“tjo
the extent,
if at
all,
that the Agency complied with the provisions of Section
39(a)
of the Act...”, and cites
in turn various Regulations cited by the
Agency
in its permit rejections,
Springfield continues
to note
that
it contests the “legal and/or factual sufficiency’t of the
Agency’s permit determinations.
The Board finds that the Petitions are now adequate under
Procedural Rule 502(a)
and our Interim Order of September 29,
1977.
Springfield has adequately placed at issue all grounds cited by the
Agency for rejecting
the
various permits in question.
Springfield
should, however, distinguish clearly those grounds cited by the
Agency for permit rejection which are to be contested factually
from those which Springfield might choose to contest only on legal
grounds;
following hearings, the latter should be fully discussed
in thorough briefs.
The
onsolidated cases shall be set for hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
28
—193
—2—
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk
of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify the above Interim Order was adopted on the
)~-~
day of~1~~&j
,
1977 by a vote of
~./.—3
~
~
~hristan
L. Moffe
~‘
Clerk
Illinois Pollutio
ontrol Board
28
—
194