ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    May
    25,
    1978
    SHELL OIL COMPANY,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 77—306
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
    AGENCY,
    Respondent
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Goodman):
    On November 28,
    1978,
    Shell Oil Company
    (Shell
    Oil)
    filed
    a Petition for Variance before the Board from Rules
    202 and 204
    of Chapter
    8:
    Noise Pollution Regulations,
    for noise
    emissions
    from its petroleum refinery located in Wood River, Madison
    County,
    Illinois,
    The Agency filed its Recommendation on Janua~
    19,
    1978.
    No
    hearing has been held
    in
    this matter.
    The Wood River refinery has a nominal crude oil processing
    capacity of 295,000 barrels per operating day.
    The refinery is
    abutted on its south property line by South Foxana,
    Illinois
    which contains numerous Class A and Class B land uses
    as those
    uses are defined by Rules
    201(a)
    and
    (b)
    The noise emissions
    from the Wood River refinery to this area exceed the limitations
    of Rules
    202 and 204,
    Shell Oil included with it petition a
    record of noise complaints received since l959~ Since that time,
    the company has received
    5 noise complaints,
    all of which occurred
    during upset or emergency conditions;
    the most recent complaint
    was received in
    1971.
    Furthermore,
    the Agency
    in its Recommend-
    ation included the results
    of a noise survey conducted
    in the
    vicinity of the refinery.
    Of 178 inquiries sent out,
    6 responses
    were received
    three
    in favor of granting the variance and three
    opposed.
    The Agency also indicated it had received no unsolicited
    complaints.
    Since 1965,
    Shell Oil has installed
    19
    vent silencers
    to
    eliminate noise from atmospheric
    vents
    on
    various pressure sys-
    tems.
    Subsequent to passage of the Noise Regulations,
    Shell Oil
    30
    289

    —2—
    commenced and completed acoustical treatment of three process
    heaters and the air blowers on the Catalytic Cracking Unit Number
    One.
    Shell Oil has determined that the remaining principal contri-
    butors to the sound pressure levels
    in South Roxana are the process
    heaters of Catalytic Reformer Number Three
    (CR-3), Hydrodesulfur-
    izer
    Unit
    Number Two
    (HDU-2), and Catalytic Reformer Number Two
    (CR-2).
    Shell Oil has undertaken a combination energy conservatior
    noise abatement project which includes replacement of the burners
    and addition of acoustically—treated plenums and blowers on the six
    heaters at CR-3 and HDU—2.
    Shell Oil indicates
    in its petition
    that the noise portion of these projects will cost approximately
    $500,000 and will,
    by June
    30,
    1979, eliminate approximately 99
    of
    the acoustical power presently being generated by these heaters.
    The remaining major contributor,
    CR-2,
    is an old unit which was
    unexpectedly reactivated because of current national energy
    requirements and the gasoline lead reduction program.
    Its furnace
    is over
    20 years old,
    contains
    96 burners,
    six tiers high,
    and
    presents a complex acoustical treatment problem.
    Shell Oil has
    initiated a program to determine
    if a practical solution to the
    problem exists.
    The study will be completed
    in approximately
    one to two years;
    if a solution is found,
    it will probably require
    two to four years
    to implement.
    Shell Oil also indicates in its
    petition that any new process facilities will be designed to mini-
    mize the emission of sound.
    Using an acoustical model,
    Shell Oil evaluated the effect of
    the already completed and the projected noise abatement measures
    on the noise emitted
    to South Roxana.
    Shell Oil used its computer
    model
    to calculate contour lines showing compliance with Rule
    202,
    Class C to Class A land.
    Using the results of Shell Oil’s evalua-
    tion,
    the Agency determined the approximate land area and number
    of people affected by the current and projected noise abatement
    measures, as shown in the following tables:
    Area Affected by Noise_Emissions
    in Violation of Rule 202 Now
    ~
    nd Al~er
    Furnace
    Noise
    Aba
    Lemen L
    Acres
    Reduction
    Before
    LF
    &
    E
    Reduction
    86.1
    Now
    50.0
    42
    After
    CR-3/HDU-2
    Reduction
    40.3
    After
    CR-2
    Reduction
    9.3
    89
    30
    290

    —3—
    The
    above
    areas
    are
    not
    indicative
    of
    any
    particular
    land use, but
    only
    of
    total
    land
    area
    of
    whatever land use.
    People Living
    in Noise Contour Bands
    Now and After Furnace Noise Abatement
    People
    Noise Contour Band;
    dB(A)
    55—60
    60—65
    65—70
    Now
    277
    66
    CR-3/HDU~-2 Reduction
    211
    13
    CR-2
    Reduction
    142
    7
    0
    The Board finds that
    Shell
    Oil has
    in good faith attempted to
    comply with the Noise Regulations and that the compliance plan pro-
    posed will afford protection
    to the residents
    in the South Roxana
    community.
    The Board finds that denial of the requested variance
    would impose an arbitrary and unreasonable hardship upon Shell Oil.
    We will,
    therefore, grant Shell Oil a variance from Rules
    202 and
    204 of Chapter
    8 for a period of five years,
    subject to the condi-
    tions listed in the Order below.
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
    of law of the Board in this matter.
    ORDER
    It
    is
    the
    Order
    of
    the
    Pollution
    Control Board that Shell Oil
    Company
    be
    granted
    a
    variance from Rules 202 and
    204
    of Chapter
    8
    until June
    30,
    1979,
    for the sound emitted from its Wood River
    refinery to the area shown in Figure
    2 of Appendix II to Shell’s
    petition and until May 25,
    1983,
    for the area shown in Figure
    3
    of Appendix II, corrected
    to zero wind conditions,
    subject
    to the
    following conditions:
    1.
    Shell Oil’s sound emissions shall not exceed the
    levels depicted as current levels
    in Appendix IV
    to its petition;
    2.
    The sound emitted from any new equipment, process
    or facility at Shell Oil’s refinery shall at no
    time exceed Rules 202 and 204 of Chapter
    8;
    30
    291

    3.
    Shell Oil shall submit reports
    to the Agency
    every
    6 months commencing with the date of
    this Order and ending on or before June
    30,
    1979,
    detailing its progress on the CR-3/HDU-2
    noise reduction program, described in its peti-
    tion and shall forward to the Agency the new
    plenum design as soon as it is completed;
    4.
    Shell Oil shall submit to the Agency every
    6
    months commencing with the date of this
    variance detailing its progress on its CR—2
    heater unit noise reduction program, described
    in its petition,
    including development of
    further noise control techniques for the CR—2
    heater unit or any alternative plans
    for its
    ultimate replacement.
    5.
    Within
    45 days
    of
    the
    adoption
    of
    this Order,
    Shell Oil Company shall execute and forward to
    both the Illinois
    Environmental
    Protection
    Agency,
    2200 Churchill
    Road,
    Springfield,
    Illinois 62706 and
    the
    Pollution
    Control
    Board
    a Certification of
    Acceptance
    and
    Agreement to
    be bound
    to all terms
    and
    conditions of this
    Order.
    The
    45 day period shall be held in
    abeyance during any period this matter
    is being
    appealed.
    The
    form
    of
    said
    Certification shall
    be as follows:
    CERTIFICATION
    I
    (We),
    having read and
    fully understanding the Order of the Illinois Pollu-
    tion Control
    Board
    in
    PCB
    77-306 hereby accept said
    Order
    and
    agree
    to
    he
    bound
    by all of the terms
    and
    conditions
    thereof.
    SIGNED
    TITLE
    DATE
    Dr~ Satchell abstains.

    —5—
    I,
    Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board,
    hereby certify
    the above Opinion and Order
    were ado ted on the~~”~__day
    of
    1978 by a vote
    of________________
    Illinois Pollut.
    Control Board
    30 —=293

    Back to top