ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April
13,
1978
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY,
petitioner,
V.
)
PCB 77—347
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
MS. CHRISTINE HEHMEYER OF ISHAM, LINCOLN
& BEALE
appeared on behalf of Petitioner.
MESSRS.
WILLIAM BARZANO AND PATRICK CHESLEY, ASSISTANT
ATTORNEYS GENERAL, appeared on behalf of Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr.
Dumelle);
Petitioner has requested a Variance from the drinking
water standards for iron and manganese. The Agency filed
a Recommendation
in support of the Variance.
A hearing
was held on March
9,
1978 at the Logan County Courthouse
in Lincoln,
Illinois.
Petitioner owns and operates
the public water supply
which serves the residents of the City of Lincoln.
The
water from six of the supply’s eight wells
is not being
adequately treated to comply with the iron
(0.3 mg/i)
and manganese
(0.05 mg/i)
levels mandated by Rule 304(b) (4)
of Chapter
6:
Public Water Supplies.
Petitioner’s latest
sampling data from these six wells
show levels of 0.37
mg/i iron and 0.30 mg/i manganese.
The Acj~ncy’srecords
show the following data:
Tron
Manganese
AVCLdqe
0.94
iiiq/~.
0.49 mj/i
High
2.40 mg/i
1.20 mg/i
Low
0.10 mg/i
0.18 mg/i
Petitioner acquired the Lincoln Water Supply
in a merger
with Central Illinois Gas and Electric.
Until
1976 Petitioner
was attempting to sell the system.
When the Illinois Commerce
Commission disapproved a proposed sale, Petitioner engaged
independent consultants to recommend alternate methods
of compliance.
The result was the aeration—sedimentation—
filtration system which
is being proposed here.
Both
30-29
—2—
parties agree that this program should result in compliance
and that March 31,
1979
is a reasonable target date
for completion.
A total expenditure of $1,525,000.00
is con-
templated.
In its Opinion supporting the adoption of the drinking
water standards,
the Board stated that high levels of iron
and manganese did not constitute health hazards.
Limits
were set on these parameters
so that staining of fixtures
and laundry could be avoided.
A compliance date of January
1,
1978 was selected to give the affected communities an
opportunity to evaluate alternate methods of compliance.
Although Petitioner was somewhat. slow in developing
its compliance plan,
its reluctance to ~ct~can be
explained by its belief that the water supply would be
sold.
Petitioner
felt that the future of the Lincoln
water supply should be left up to the entity that would
be responsible.
Once the Illinois Commerce Commission
ruled that Petitioner would remain in control, Petitioner
acted relatively expeditiously.
It would be unreasonable
to require Petitioner
to
provide water which conforms to Board standards while
construction
is going on since no threat to public health
is present and since no feasible interim method exists.
Since no general contractor will
he retained to con-
struct the required improvements and Petitioner has
sufficient assets to insure timely completion,
no bond shall
be required.
This Opinion constitutes the Board~ findings of
fact and conclusions of law in this matter.
ORDER
It
is
the
Order
of
the
Pol luLion
Control
J3o~rd that
Petitioner
be
granted
a
Variance
from
the
drinking
water
sLandards
br
iron
and
manganese
in
Rule
304(b)
(4)
of
Chapter
6:
Public
Water
Supplies
until
March
31,
1979
subject
to the following conditions:
1)
Petitioner
shall adhere to the Compliance Schedule
submitted as Exhibit A in this proceeding, which
is hereby incorporated into this Order.
2)
Petitioner
shall submit progress reports to the
Agency every three
(3) months until completion of
the project.
30-30
3)
Petitioner shall maintain ~a program
of
periodic
main flushing to alleviate problems caused by
iron and manganese sediment buildup.
4) Within 45 days after the date of this Order,
Petitioner shall execute and forward to the
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
Division
of Public Water Supply,
2200 Churchill Road,
Springfield, Illinois
62706
a Certification
of Acceptance and Agreement to be bound to all
terms and conditions of this Variance,
This
45
day period shall be held in abeyance during any period
this matter
is being appealed.
The form of this
Certification shall be as follows:
CERTIFICATION
I
(We)
,
________________
_______
,
having read and fully
understanding the Order of tH~il1i~5isPollution Control
Board
in PCB 77-347 hereby accept that Order and agree to
be bound by all of its terms and conditions,
SIGNED
TITLE
DATE
I,
Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order
were adopted
n the ,J~,~day
of
~4J,
1978
by a vote of
~
.
U
Illinois Pollut
Board
30—3~