ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
 BOARD
October 19,
 1978
DEPARTMENT
 OF
 THE
 ARMY,
 )
Petitioner,
)
v.
 )
 PCB 78—24
)
ENVIRONMENTAL
 PROTECTION
 AGENCY,
 )
Respondent.
CAPTAIN
 WARREN
 D.
 HALL,
 APPEARED
 ON
 BEHALF
 OF
 THE
 DEPARTMENT
 OF
THE
 ARMY.
JILL
 L.
 DRELL,
 ASSISTANT
 ATTORNEY
 GENERAL,
 APPEARED
 ON
 BEHALF
 OF
THE
 ENVIRONMENTAL
 PROTECTION
 AGENCY.
OPINION
 AND
 ORDER
 OF
 THE
 BOARD
 (by
 Mr.
 Goodman):
On February
3,
 1978,
 the
 Department
 of
 the
 Army
 filed this
Petition for Variance before the Board requesting relief from Rules
102,
 103(b) (2),
 203(g) (1) (B), 303 and 307 of Chapter
 2, Air Pollu-
tion Control Regulations, for its boiler plant facility located at
the Rock Island Arsenal in Rock Island, Illinois.
 A hearing was
held in this matter on August 14, l978~ the Board has received no
 written public comment concerning this petition.
Rock Island Arsenal
 is
 a U.S.
 Government arsenal producing
various types of armament exclusively for the use of the United
States Army.
 The arsenal
 is located on Rock Island,
 an island in
the Mississippi River in the center
 of
 an area known as
 the Quad-
Cities area, surrounded by the cities
 of Moline, East Noline,
 and
Rock Island, Illinois and Davenport and Bettendorf,
 Iowa.
 The
arsenal employs 2700 people directly and provides employment for
4300 additional personnel in tenant activities
 of the Federal
government who share the installation grounds or the arsenal.
The approximate annual payroll
 is
 $130,000,000, and approximately
$7,000,000
 is channelled into these surrounding communities through
local purchases by the various government activities located at
the arsenal.
 Heating at the arsenal is provided
 by
 the Rock Island
arsenal boiler plant which contains four coal fired boilers which
are the subject of this petition.
 The boilers burn approximately
42,000
 tons of coal per year, generating approximately 690,000,000
pounds of process and heating steam during that period.
 During the
last quarter of 1977,
 tests performed on the boilers indicated that
31—647
—2—
they were not in compliance with the Pollution Control Board Rules
and Regulations with respect to particulate emissions.
The Corps of Engineers recently completed a $5OO,O00~project
to bring the boiler plant into compliance by utilizing upgraded
controls on all boilers and by installing mechanical collectors
on boilers
 3 and
 4.
 When tests indicated the project had failed
to bring the boiler plant into compliance, the Corps made further
investigations and decided that the mechanical collectors could
not be sufficiently improved to meet the standards.
 It there-
fore proposes that all boilers be brought into compliance by the
use of baghouses at an estimated cost of $5,627,000 and an estimated
completion date of November,
 1981.
 In addition, the
 Army
 proposes
to operate the boilers in such
 a manner as to minimize particulate
emissions and to minimize the duration of time that the plant will
be out of compliance.
 Due to the demand characteristics of the
facility, it is possible to rely on boilers
 1 and
 2
 (which are
approximately 5
 and 20
 above the allowed emissions,
 respectively)
for approximately eight months of the year.
 A proposed boiler
usage schedule
 is contained in the amended petition on page
 5.
Citing the adverse economic affect on the Quad—Cities
 area,
the affect on national defense, and the hardship that would accrue
to the numerous tenants of the facility, the Army alleges arbitrary
and unreasonable hardship should the request for variance be denied.
Details of the Army’s activities at the arsenal are contained in
the petition for variance and the record.
 The Army also points
out that,
 although the original equipment installed on the boilers
was not approved by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
(Agency), at the time of installation the facility was not under
the authority of the Board’s Regulations.
 The Army alleges that
it has made a good faith effort to correct the emissions problem
and defends the lengthy construction schedule by citing the various
congressional constraints upon such expenditures.
 The Agency does
not seriously contest the allegations in the variance petition, with
the exception of the length of time requested for compliance.
 It
is the Agency’s opinion that a more reasonable construction schedule
would extend for no more than
 a year and
 a half, rather than the
more than three years requested by the Army.
 It
 is the Board’s
opinion, however, after reviewing the testimony
 in the record con-
cerning the subject, that the constraints imposed by the United
States Congress on the Army concerning expenditures for the equipment
make the longer time period reasonable.
 Nevertheless, we note that
the Federal Clean Air Act as amended in 1977 precludes the Board
 from granting variances beyond July 1,
 1979.
~31-64&
—3—
Rock Island Arsenal is located in a designated nonattainment
area for total suspended particulates.
 The Agency has estimated
total particulate emissions from the four boilers in 1977 to be
113 tons in excess of allowable emissions.
 The Agency alleges and
the
Army
acknowledges that the particulate emissions in question
are in part responsible for continuing ambient air violations
 in
the area.
 Against this emission situation,
 the Board must balance
the hardship to the Army and,
 in addition,
 the potential injury
to the populace should the variance be denied.
 Local civic
leaders
 testified
 here
 in
 person
 and
 by
 letters
 at
 the
 hearing.
All
 were
 in
 favor
 of
 granting the variance and indicated that
hardship
 would
 result
 from
 a
 denial
 of
 the
 petition.
 In
 addition,
the
 record
 indicated
 a
 complete
 lack
 of
 complaints
 about
 the
 emis-
sions since
 1972.
 On balance, the Board finds that denial of the
requested variance would result in an arbitrary and unreasonable
hardship.
 We will grant the variance,
 subject to conditions listed
in our Order, until July 1,
 1979.
 We note that,
 should the Army
fail to comply by that date,
 it will be subject to noncompliance
penalties pursuant to Section 113(d)
 of the Federal Clean Air Act
(42 U.S.C., Section 7401 et~a.).
The Army has requested variance from Rules
 102,
 103(b) (2),
203(g) (l)(B),
 303 and 307.
 Because Rule 103(b) (6) allows sources
operating under a variance to obtain a permit, no variance from
the permit requirement of Rule 103(b) (2)
 is necessary.
 Furthermore,
Rule
 303 does not apply in a nonattainment area,
 and Rule
 07 merely
recites the ambient air quality standard but does not itself
prohibit a violation of the standard.
 The prohibition is contained
in Rule 102.
 Variance from Rule 303 is, therefore, not appropriate
in this situation, and Rule 307
 is not a rule from which variances
are granted.
 The Board will grant the variance request as to
Rules
 102 and 203(g) (1) (B) but will dismiss the request as
 to
Rules
 103(b) (2)
,
 303 and 307.
This Opinion consitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
of law of the Board in this matter.
ORDER
It is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that:
1)
 The Department of the Army’s request for variance from
Rules
 10 3(b) (2),
 303 and 307 of Chapter
 2 for its Rock Island
Arsenal
 is hereby dismissed;
31-649
—4—
2)
 The Department of the
Army
is hereby granted variance
from
 Rules
 102
 and
 203(g)
 (1)
 (B)
 of
 Chapter
 2
 until
 July
 1,
 1979,
for particulate emissions from its Rock Island Arsenal, subject
to the following conditions:
a)
 During the term of this variance, the Depart-
ment of the
Army
shall not allow particulate emissions
at its Rock Island Arsenal to exceed, during any one
hour
 period,
 the
 following
 limitations:
Boiler
 lbs./hr.
 lbs./MBTU
21.38
 .207
2
 26.66
 .245
3
 66.67
 .57
4
 26.85
 .32
b)
 During
the term of this variance, the Depart-
ment of the Army shall operate its boilers
 in such
a manner as to minimize particulate emissions and
shall adhere to the schedule of boiler operations
 outlined in paragraph 10 of its Amended Recommenda-
tion;
c)
 The Department of the Army shall,
 within
 45
days
 of the date of this Order,
 apply
 to the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency for all necessary
construction permits for the baghouses it intends to
install on its boilers;
d)
 The Department of the Army
 is hereby notified
that it will be subject to noncompliance penalties
under Section 120 of the Clean Air Act
 (42 U.S.C.
7401 et ~
 if it fails to achieve final compliance
with Rules 102 and 203(g) (1) (B) by July
 1,
 1979;
e)
 Within
 45 days of the adoption of this Order the
Department of the Army shall execute and forward to
the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, 2200
Churchill Road, Springfield, Illinois
 62706 a Certi-
fication of Acceptance and Agreement to be bound to
all terms and conditions of this Order.
 The
 45
 day
period shall be held in abeyance during any period
this matter is being appealed.
 The form of said
certification shall be as follows:
31—650
—5—
CERTIFICATION
I
 (We), _____________________________, having read and
fully
 understanding
 the
 Order
 of
 the
 Illinois
 Pollution
 Control
Board
 in
 PCB
 78-24,
 hereby
 accept
 said
 Order
 and agree to be
bound by all of the terms and conditions thereof.
SIGNED
 _________________________
TITLE ____________________________
DATE ______________________________
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, here~certify the ab v
 Opinion and Order were
adopted on 1the
 ~‘
 day of
________________,
 1978
 by
 a
vote of
 LI...~()
Christan L. Moffett,~’ç’~erk
Illinois Pollution ~o’h~rolBoard