ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
    BOARD
    August 24,
    1978
    EXXON CHEMICAL CORPORP~TION,
    )
    Petitioner,
    )
    v.
    )
    PCB 77—329
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Respondent.
    OPINION
    AND
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Goodman):
    Exxon Chemical Corporation
    (Exxon)
    submitted a Petition for
    Variance before the Board on December
    9,
    1977,
    and submitted
    amendments to its petition on February
    2 and April
    18,
    1978.
    The
    Environmental Protection Agency
    (Agency) submitted its Recommend-
    ation on March 10,
    1978,
    and submitted amendments on May 22 and
    July 19,
    1978.
    No hearing has been held in this matter.
    Exxon
    waived its right
    to a 90-day decision ~inthis matter to and in-
    cluding September
    7,
    1978.
    On February 16,
    1978, Respondent sub-
    mitted a motion to dismiss, which the Board ordered would be taken
    with the case.
    That motion
    is denied.
    In its petition, Exxon requests a variance from the suspended
    solids limitation in Rule 408(a) of the Board’s Water Pollution
    Regulations, Chapter
    3 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations.
    The
    variance
    is sought for two plants operated by Exxon in Lake Zurich,
    Illinois, engaged in the processing and distribution of polyeth-
    lene and polypropylene products.
    The process effluent from the
    facility consists of cooling tower blowdown,
    compressor blowdown,
    boiler blowdown, softener backwash and contact cooling water.
    Exxon’s facility discharges approximately 12,000 gallons per day
    into an on—site pond which discharges to a storm sewer thereafter
    flowing to a privately-owned pond.
    Exxon’s NPDES permit contains a 15 mg/i daily maximum con-
    centration limit for total suspended solids,
    as does Rule 408(a).
    Grab samples taken by the Agency revealed discharge levels within
    the allowable limit.
    However, Exxon requests
    a variance because
    samples taken during periods of heavy rainfall indicate that
    suspended solids concentrations may exceed 15 mg/i due to storm
    water run-off.
    31—253

    —2—
    Exxon requests that the variance be granted for one year
    and proposes to achieve compliance by segregation of storm and
    process flow followed by either discharge of process flows to
    the municipal Sanitary sewerage system or discharge of process
    flows to a treatment system capable of meeting applicable regu-
    lations.
    Exxon’s existing sanitary sewers are tributary to the
    Village of Lake Zurich Northwest Sewage Treatment Plant.
    The Agency indicates in its Recommendation that there are
    no federal Best Practical Control Technology Currently Available
    (BPCTCA)
    effluent guidelines applicable to Exxon.
    For purposes
    of this proceeding,
    the Agency contends
    that Exxon’s current
    controls constitute BPCTCA.
    Granting of the requested variance
    would, therefore, be consistent with federal law.
    Furthermore, the Agency’s investigation has revealed that
    Exxon’s discharge contains
    a high concentration of total dis-
    solved solids which could potentially cause or contribute to vio-
    lations of the general use water quality standard for total dis-
    solved solids and chlorides since Exxon discharges to an inter-
    mittent water course which discharges to
    3 quiescent ponds and the
    Hawthorne Ditch.
    Therefore,
    the Agency suggests that during the
    term of the variance Exxon also needs a variance from Rule 203(f)
    of the Water Regulations.
    The Board finds that an arbitrary and unreasonable hardship
    would result from denial of the requested variance and that Exxon’s
    compliance program is acceptable.
    The Board will, therefore,
    grant Exxon
    a one-year variance from Rules
    203(f)
    and 408(a).
    This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
    of law of the Board in this matter.
    ORDER
    It
    is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that:
    1.
    Exxon Chemical Corporation be and is hereby granted
    a variance from the total dissolved solids and
    chloride standards of Rules
    203(f)
    and the total
    suspended solids standard of 408(a)
    of Chapter
    3
    for one year from the date of this Order, subject
    to the following conditions:
    A.
    Within
    60 days,
    Exxon shall submit a program
    and schedule to the Agency for segregation of
    storm and process flow;
    31—254

    —3--
    B.
    Within 120 days, Exxon shall file a construction
    permit application with the Agency involving
    either connection to the Lake Zurich Nortwest
    Sewage Treatment Plant or construction of a
    sewage treatment system capable of meeting
    applicable standards; and
    C.
    Within 45 days the Exxon Chemical Corporation
    shall execute and forward to the Illinois
    Environmental Protection Agency, 2200 Churchill
    Road,
    Springfield, Illinois 62706
    a Certifi-
    cation o~Acceptance and Agreement to be bound
    to all terms and conditions of this Order.
    The
    45 day period shall be held in abeyance during
    any period this matter is being appealed.
    The
    form of said certification shall be as follows:
    CERTIFICATION
    I
    (We),______________________________having read and fully
    understanding the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board in PCB 77—329 hereby accept said Order and agree
    to
    be bound by all of the terms and conditions thereof.
    SIGNED____________________________
    TITLE____________________________
    DATE_______________________________
    2.
    Respondent’s February 16,
    1978, Motion to Dismiss
    is
    hereby denied.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk
    of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby certify the ab ye Opinion and Order were
    ado~tedonthe~-~~4day ~
    1978 by a vote of
    Christan L. Moffet ,&~rk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    31—255

    Back to top