ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    July 6,
    1978
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    )
    Complainant,
    )
    v.
    )
    PCB 77—310
    DELUXE FLOORING,
    INC.,
    )
    an Illinois corporation,
    Respondent.
    MR. ARTHUR B. MUIR,
    ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, APPEARED ON
    BEHALF
    OF
    THE
    COMPLAINANT.
    DELUXE
    FLOORING,
    INCORPORATED
    (BY
    MR.
    THOMAS
    BENNETT,
    PRESIDENT
    AND
    MR. JAY STIMPSON, VICE-PRESIDENT), APPEARED
    ON BEHALF OF
    THE
    RESPONDENT.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by
    Mr.
    Werner):
    This
    matter comes before the Board on the November 29,
    1977
    Complaint brought by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    alleging that,
    from April
    20,
    1972 until October
    2,
    1973, Deluxe
    Flooring,
    Inc.
    (“Deluxe”)
    improperly received refuse at its solid
    waste disposal site and that beginning on or about December 2,
    1973, Respondent failed to place final cover on the site in
    violation of Rule 301 and Rule 305(c)
    of Chapter
    7:
    Solid Waste
    Regulations and
    Section
    21(b)
    of the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Act.
    A hearing was held on April
    25,
    1978.
    The parties
    filed
    a Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement on April 25,
    1978.
    Deluxe Flooring, Inc.
    is
    a small business which is engaged
    in
    the installation of various types of interior floor coverings.
    The sole office and place of business of this DuPage County firm
    is located in West Chicago.
    The site is located in an area
    primarily used for light industrial manufacturing.
    Agency
    inspections revealed that,
    in
    the rear of Respondent’s place of
    business, demolition materials had been
    dumped
    openly
    on
    the
    site
    and left uncovered.
    Deluxe had no permit to receive refuse, had
    not limited access to the site, had not warned others against
    dumping there, and had failed to place appropriate cover on the
    refuse.
    31.25

    —2—
    It is stipulated that “at no time has Deluxe, or any officer,
    agent or employee thereof, dumped, caused to be dumped, or
    authorized the dumping of refuse at the site.
    All refuse at the
    site has been placed there without the authorization or approval
    of Deluxe.”
    (Stip.,
    p. 4-5).
    However, Deluxe failed to properly
    limit
    access to the site.
    The parties also stipulate that the
    accumulation of refuse at the site is primarily due to the acces-
    sibility of Deluxe’s property to motorized traffic.
    (Stip.,
    p.
    5).
    The stipulated facts related to the litigation indicate that
    since December
    2,
    1973, Deluxe has failed to place adequate daily
    cover on all exposed refuse in violation of Solid Waste Rule 305(a)
    and Section 21(b)
    of the Act.
    Similarly,
    since December
    2,
    1973,
    the firm has failed to place appropriate final cover on the site
    in violation of Solid Waste Rule 305(c) and Section 21(b)
    of the
    Act.
    Both the Complainant and Deluxe Flooring,
    Inc. agree that it
    is technically feasible and economically reasonable to limit
    access to the site and close the site in conformance with the Act
    and the Board’s Solid Waste Regulations.
    Thus,
    a settlement
    proposal has been presented to resolve this enforcement proceeding.
    Basically,
    the settlement agreement provides that the Company
    will:
    (1) immediately place final cover on the site; grade and
    contour the covered areas of the site;
    and seed all of the covered
    areas to provide erosion control;
    (2)
    limit access to the site
    (within
    3 weeks of the Board’s approval of the proposed settle-
    ment, weather permitting)
    by installation of a sturdy gate and
    fencing to prevent unauthorized traffic onto the site;
    (3)
    pay
    $2,148.00 to Arrow Kennel
    & Fence Company to have appropriate
    fencing installed in accordance with Arrow’s Proposal (Exhibit
    “K”
    of Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement);
    (4)
    close and
    lock the gate during non—working hours and all other occasions
    when adequate supervision cannot be maintained to prevent
    unauthorized traffic on the site;
    (5)
    submit monthly progress
    reports to the Agency detailing the work accomplished and the
    work remaining to be accomplished; and
    (6) notify the Agency,
    in writing, within one week of the completed installation of the
    fencing and the placement of final cover on the site.
    The parties also agree and stipulate that, considering the
    size and nature of the Respondent’s business, the expenditure of
    over $2,000.00
    ,
    even if not strictly as a penalty, will impose
    a substantial burden on Deluxe’s financial resources.
    The net
    taxable income of the corporation for the year 1977,
    as reflected
    by its U.
    S.
    Income Tax Return,
    is stipulated to be approximately
    31-26

    —3—
    $1,500.00
    .
    (Stip.., p.2).
    In view of the nature of the viola-
    tions, and because of the strong probability that the installa-
    tion of the gate and fence will eliminate all future violations,
    the parties agree that an additional penalty is not appropriate
    in this case.
    In evaluating this enforcement action and proposed settle-
    ment,
    the Board has taken into consideration all the facts and
    circumstances in light of the specific criteria delineated in
    Section 33(c)
    of the Act.
    Incinerator, Inc.
    V.
    Illinois
    Pollution Control Board,
    59 Ill.
    2d 290, 319 N.E.
    2d 794
    (1974)
    Accordingly,
    the Board accepts the Stipulation and Proposal
    for Settlement and finds Deluxe Flooring,
    Inc.
    in violation of
    Rule 305(a) and Rule 305(c) of Chapter
    7:
    Solid Waste Rules and
    Regulations and Section 21(b)
    of the Act from December 2,
    1973
    until November 29,
    1977.
    In light of the Respondent’s pending
    expenditure of over $2,000.00 to correct these violations,
    the
    Board will impose no penalty.
    This Opinion and Order constitute the Board’s findings of
    fact and conclusions of law in this matter.
    ORDER
    It
    is the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board that:
    1.
    Deluxe Flooring, Inc.
    has violated Rule 305(a)
    and Rule
    305(c)
    of Chapter
    7:
    Solid Waste Rules and Regulations and
    Section 21(b)
    of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act from
    December
    2,
    1973 until November 29,
    1977.
    2.
    Deluxe Flooring,
    Inc. shall comply with all the terms
    and conditions of the Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement
    filed April
    25,
    1978, which
    is incorporated by reference as if
    fully set forth herein.
    I,
    Christan L.
    Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board,
    hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were
    adopted on the
    L~’
    day of
    ,
    1978 by a
    vote of
    ‘-/-O
    OALL~Pm~4~
    Christan L. Moffe~WJClerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    31.27

    Back to top