ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
October
4,
1979
VILLAGE OF BETHANY,
Petitioner,
v
)
PCB 79—173
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr.
Dumelie):
Petitioner has requested a variance from Rules
404 and
402 as
it pertains to deoxygenating wastes and 402.1 and
203(f)
as
it pertains to ammonia nitrogen.
The Agency has
recommended that a variance be granted.
No hearing was
held.
Petitioner was
granted a variance from the phosphorus
standards in Village
of Bethany v.
EPA,
PCB 76—230,
24 PCB
349, December 2,
1976.
The Board takes notice of the record
in that proceeding.
Petitioner operates a sewage treatment plant in Moultrie
County with a designed average flow of 200,000 gallons per
day. The plant discharges to an unnamed tributary of Marrowbone
Creek which
flows into Lake Shelbyville.
Petitioner
is presently required by Rule 404(f) to
maintain effluent quality of 4 mg/i BOD and 5 mg/i suspended
solids
(4/5).
Petitioner applied
to the Agency for a Pfeffer
exemption which would have allowed
a 10/12 standard but was
denied because of inability to model downstream dissolved
oxygen.
Presumably
this decision was based on the problems
encountered by discharging
to a tributary of Lake Shelbyville.
Both Petitioner and the Agency agree that Petitioner is
presently unable to meet the 4/5 standard.
Petitioner’s
Facilities Plan
(Step
1 of
its construction grant) determined
that the most cost effective method to pursue was upgrading
to meet a 10/12 standard and the addition of rotating biological
contactors for ammonia removal.
These improvements are
scheduled for completion by March,
1981.
Petitioner claims
and the Agency agrees that Petitioner’s other alternatives to
its planned course,
transporting its waste
to another watershed
or land application, are economically unreasonable.
The Board concludes that denial of a variance from Rule
404(f) would constitute arbitrary or unreasonable hardship.
Compliance with the 4/5 standard would involve great expense
—2—
on Petitioner’s part which may be rendered unnecessary if
the Board adopts the pending rule change
(R77—12, Docket C)
which would drop the 4/5 standard.
The Board does not feel
it would be appropriate
to
require Petitioner
to comply with
the Agency’s requested schedule of sampling for dissolved
oxygen,
BOO, ammonia and pH.
The Agency has not shown that
a community the size of Petitioner’s (population 1300)
should bear these additional costs.
Petitioner has also requested relief from Rule 402.1.
While Petitioner has untreated influent
less than 60 pounds
per day and its treatment plant was
in existence on April
11,
1977,
the plant
needs upgrading to comply with Rule
404(f). Consequently Petitioner does not qualify for an
exemption from ammonia removal under Rule 402.1(a).
The
Agency has advised the Board that on at least one occasion
in the past year Petitioner’s effluent has caused the receiving
stream to reach
6.4 rng/l ammonia nitrogen.
Consequently
Petitioner
is presently required by Rule 402.1(b) to comply
with Rule 203(f)
from April
to October and with an effluent
standard of 4.0 mg/l from November through March.
Since
Petitioner is already planning to install ammonia removal
facilities by March,
1981,
denial
of a variance from Rules
203(f) and 402.1(b) would also constitute arbitrary or
unreasonable hardship.
ORDER
1.
Petitioner
is hereby granted
a variance from Rule
404(f) of Chapter
3: Water Pollution for two years from
the date of this Order or until the Board reaches
a
final decision in R77—12, Docket
C, whichever occurs
first,
subject to the condition that discharges
from
Petitioner’s treatment facilities not exceed 10 mg/l
BOD and 12 mg/i suspended solids as monthly averages.
2.
Petitioner
is hereby granted a variance from Rules
203(f)
as
it pertains
to ammonia nitrogen and 402.1(b)
for two years from the date of this Order or until
ammonia removal facilities are operational, whichever
occurs
first.
3.
The Agency is hereby authorized to modify or reissue
Petitioner~sNPDES permit in a manner consistent with
the terms
of this Order including the application of
interim effluent limitations based on best practicable
operation and maintenance of existing treatment facilities.
4.
Within 45 days of the date of this Order,
Petitioner
shall
execute a certification of acceptance and agreement
to be bound to all the terms and conditions of this
variance. This
45 day period shall he held in abeyance
if this matter is appealed.
The certification shall be
35—494
—3—
forwarded to the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency,
Division of Water Pollution Control,
2200
Churchill Road, Springfield, Illinois
62706 and shall
read as follows:
CERTIFICATION
I
(We),
,
having
read and fully understanding the Order in PCB 79—173 hereby
accept that Order and agree to be bound by all of its terms
and conditions.
SIGNED
________________________________
TITLE
_________________________________
DATE
____________________________________
IT
IS SO ORDERED.
Dr. Satchell abstains.
I, Christan L.
Moffett,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, hereby ceç~ifythe above Opinion
n
Order
were adopted on the
_________________
day of
1979 by a vote of
3~..Q
Christan L. Moffet
,
rk
Illinois Pollution
n rol Board
35—495