ILLINOIS POLI~UTIONCONTROL BOARD
    October
    4,
    1979
    CITY OF WINDSOR,
    Petitioner,
    V.
    )
    PCB 79—130
    )
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Respondent.
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Dr.
    Satchell):
    This matter comes before the Board upon a motion filed
    September 20, 1979 by the Environmental Protection Agency
    (Agency).
    The motion seeks reconsideration of the Board’s Order of August 23,
    1979 in which the City of Windsor was granted a conditional
    variance
    from
    the
    water
    quality
    standards
    for
    dissolved
    oxygen
    contained
    in
    Rules
    203(d)
    and
    402
    of
    Chapter
    3:
    Water
    Pollution.
    That Order was entered on
    a petition and Agency recommendation
    after the Petitioner waived a hearing.
    The recommendation was to
    grant the variance subject to conditions.
    One of these conditions
    was that Petitioner sample the water quality of the receiving
    stream at two points downstream.
    The variance of August 23, 1979
    was not conditioned upon this sampling program.
    Petitioner discharges treated municipal wastewater into an
    intermittent stream which is tributary to Sandy Creek three to
    four and one half miles upstream of Lake Shelbyville.
    In its
    Step I, Facilities Plan,
    Petitioner has advanced three alternative
    control plans.
    One of these would involve pumping 13,000 feet
    into an alternative basin to avoid discharging into Lake Shelby-
    ville.
    The Agency’s recommendation asked that the variance be
    conditioned on Petitioner taking samples from the stream where
    Sandy Creek joins the lake and midway between that point and the
    discharge.
    The Agency asked
    for sampling of ammonia nitrogen, BOD
    and pH and measurement of velocity and flow rate in Sandy Creek
    and feeder streams daily for two seven day periods each summer.
    Dissolved oxygen was to be sampled each hour or every other hour
    from 8:00 a.m.
    to 8:00 p.m. during these periods.
    Monitoring of discharges can be an essential part of sewage
    treatment and the cost is properly born by the users.
    The Board
    has ordered similar monitoring programs for larger facilities
    (City of Marion
    v. EPA,
    33 PCB 595).
    However,
    the City of Windsor
    ~S—475
    —2—
    with
    a population of 1126 probably does not have the resources
    to conduct the monitoring program requested by the Agency.
    It
    is likely that windsor would be forced to employ an outside
    consultant.
    Windsor’s average discharge of 150,000 GPD at the
    10 mg/i BOD set by the variance should not have any effect three
    miles downstream.
    If the Agency doubts
    this, it has the personnel
    and facilities to undertake the monitoring itself.
    The Board will
    not require a small community to undertake
    an extensive monitoring
    program of partially treated waste where there is only a remote
    chance of environmental harm.
    The motion to reconsider is denied.
    IT
    IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Christan L. Noffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control B,oard, hereby cer
    f
    the above Order was adodpted
    on the
    i.j’N
    day of
    ____________,
    1979 by a vote of
    ______
    QkanL.ó40
    Illinois Pollution
    ontrol Board
    35—476

    Back to top