ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
March 29,
1979
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
PROPOSED REVISIONS
TO RULES
101,
)
R79—3
103, and 105 OF CHAPTER
2, AIR
)
POLLUTION
(PERMIT CONDITIONS AND
)
MAINTENANCE PROGRAMS)
INTERIM ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr. Goodman):
In order to meet the federal deadline for submittal
of
State Implementation Plan revisions pursuant to the Clean
Air Act,
42 U.S.C.
§7401 et ~j.
(1977),
the Board hereby
proposes the following amendments to Rules 101,
103 and 105
of Chapter
2:
Air Pollution Regulations.
The Board orders
that the Hearing Officer set further hearings or set aside
time during the economic impact hearings to receive testimony
on these proposed amendments.
These proposed amendments are
not a final action in this matter for any purpose.
PROPOSED ORDER
1.
It
is proposed that the following definitions be added
to Rule 101 in their alphabetically appropriate positions:
Excess Emissions:
Emissions that exceed any standard
or limitation set forth in Part II,
IX,
or X of Chapter
2.
Malfunction:
Any sudden and unavoidable failure of air
pollution control
equipment or an emission source to
operate in a normal and usual manner.
Breakdown:
Any failure
of air pollution control equip-
ment or an emission source to operate in a normal and
usual manner if such
failure
is caused entirely or in
part by poor maintenance,
careless operation, chronic
or repeated overloading,
lack of compliance with a
required maintenance program,
or any other preventable
upset condition or preventable equipment failure.
~
The setting into operation of any air pollution
control equipment
or an emission source for any purpose,
except routine phasing in of process equipment.
Any
requirement contained in these Rules applicable to
startups shall also apply to shutdowns.
33—305
2
Shutdown:
The cessation of operation of any air
pollution control equipment or an emission source for
any purpose, except routine phasing out of process
equipment.
Any requirement contained
in these Rules
applicable to startups shall also apply to shutdowns.
2.
Rule 103
—
It is proposed that Rule 103(b)(7) be amended
as follows:
Rule 103(b)(7)
Conditions.
The Agency may impose
conditions
in an Operating Permit as may be necessary
to accomplish the purposes of the Act,
and as are not
inconsistent with the regulations promulgated by the
Board thereunder.
Except as herein specified, nothing
in this Chapter shall
be deemed to limit the power of
the Agency in this regard.
-Wh~e~-
-deemed-
-
-op~4a.~t-e-
-&e-
-~-
O4~4Oft
-t-O-
-t-he--ie-~~ee-
-or--an--Op
4-ion--~e~r~t-,-
-the-
~
-t-he- -a-it-~4~4~e~-
-oe~-r-o-1-~~i:pi~e~t--eov~-ed-
-by-—the-
-
-~
-es~e--t4~--~eh-
-~
i~
e~ai~ee-
~og~a1~-
-~
ft~ed~,-
-4~e--?~je~ey-
-~
-i~eq&~4r-e-
-t-hM~--the-~e~4~ee-
-he~e-
-~
~i~t-e~ee-
~-eg~-a~--&nd--4~eei~
-
~-a~ft-i?~t-efta~ee-
-~ee~
-as--are~ s~ar~
-to- -d
~t,~ate- -~-~~ai~ce-
-w±1±-
~
-P~u-,ei--p~o~-~ded-r
4we~e~-~-
-the--~rcJei~1-ey-
-e~a-1-I--ne-t--4~we--the-
-a~it-h&r4t-y-
-t-o--appr-o~e-
-the-~i~t-e~a~ee-
-pr-ogr-&rn--~eq~4~e4
-e~de-1~-.-
3.
Rule 105
-
Delete the current Rule 105 and substitute
the following:
Rule
105:
Maintenance, Malfunctions, Breakdowns,
Startups and Shutdowns
(a)
Prohibition
(1)
No
person
shall cause or allow the continued
operation of an emission source during break-
down of the emission source or related air
pollution control equipment
if such operation
would cause excess emissions.
(2)
No person shall
cause or allow the continued
operation of an emission source during malfunc-
tion of the emission source or related air
pollution control equipment
if such operation
would cause excess emissions unless the
conditions prescribed in paragraphs
105(c),
Records and Reports, and 105(d), Operation
during Malfunction,
Startup or Shutdown,
are
met.
(3)
No person shall cause or allow excess emissions
during startup or shutdown unless the current
33—306
3
operating permit granted by the Agency provides
for excess emissions during startup or shutdown
and the emission source is being operated in
compliance with all conditions
in the current
operating permit concerning startups or
shutdowns.
When the standards or
limitations
of Part
2 of this Chapter
2 will be violated
during startup, a request for permission to
violate such standards or limitations shall
be an integral part of the application for an
Operating Permit pursuant to Rule 103 and
shall include,
as
a minimum:
a description
of the startup procedure for each emission
source,
the duration and frequencies of such
startups,
the types and quantities of emis-
sions during such startups and the applicant’s
efforts to minimize any such startup emissions,
duration of individual startups,
and frequency
of startups.
(4)
In the following townships,
no person shall
replace the air pollution control equipment
on any source of particulate matter with a
less effective kind of control
equipment:
Cook
—
All townships
Will
-
DuPage, Plainfield,
Lockport, Joliet,
Peotone,
and florence
Macon
-
Decatur and Hickory Point
Madison
-
Alton, Chouteau, Collinsville,
Edwardsville, Fort Russell,
Godfrey, Granite City,
Nameoki,
Venice and Wood River
(b)
Maintenance.
Every owner or operator of an emis-
sion source or air pollution control equipment
shall maintain such source or equipment in accor-
dance with a maintenance program.
Such program
shall be designed to prevent
a breakdown which
could lead to excess emissions and to minimize
excess emissions
to the maximum extent practicable
if a malfunction or breakdown occurs.
The owner
or operator shall inform the Agency of the person
or persons responsible for administering the
maintenance program and upon request shall describe
the program to the Agency; provided, however,
that
the Agency shall not have the authority to approve
the maintenance programs required by this paragraph.
Every owner of an emission source or air pollution
control equipment shall comply with this paragraph
within
90 days of
the
effective date
of this
Rule.
‘33—307
4
(c)
Records and Reports.
Any person who causes or
allows the continued operation of an emission
source during a malfunction of the
emission source
or related air pollution control
equipment when
such continued operation causes excess emissions
shall,
if the excess emissions last for more than
2 hours and exceed 200 pounds or if the excess
emissions include any air contaminant which may
constitute an immediate or acute danger to health:
(1)
Notify the Agency as soon as
is reasonably
possible but not later than one working day
subsequent
to the start
of the malfunction;
and
(2)
Submit to the Agency in writing, within ten
working days,
a report including:
(A)
identification of the sources,
stacks,
instrumentation and control devices
involved in the malfunction;
(B)
time and duration of the excess emissions;
(C)
estimate of the magnitude of the excess
emissions;
(D)
nature and probable causes of the excess
emissions;
(E)
a description of the steps taken by such
person to remedy the situation causing
the excess emissions, prevent a recurrence,
and limit the excess emissions;
and
(F)
a statement of the reasons why such
continued operation was necessary to
prevent injury to persons or severe
damage to equipment or to provide
essential services.
(d)
Operation during Malfunction,
Startup or Shutdown.
It shall he a defense to an enforcement action
alleging a violation of any applicable emission
limitation or air quality standard that:
(1)
the violation occurred as a result of
a
malfunction, startup or shutdown;
(2)
the emission source and air pollution control
equipment have been operated
in accordance
with the maintenance program required by Rule
105(b);
33—308
5
(3)
repairs were made promptly when the operator
knew or should have known that applicable
emission limitations were or were likely to
he
exceeded;
(4)
the amount and duration of excess emissions
(including any bypass) were minimized
as much
as practicable during periods of
such emissions;
(5)
All reasonable steps were taken to minimize
the effect of the excess emissions
on ambient
air quality;
(6)
the excess emissions were not part of a
recurring pattern indicative of inadequate
design,
operation or maintenance; and
(7)
continued operation during the malfunction
was necessary to prevent injury to persons or
severe damage to equipment
or to provide
essential services; provided, however,
that
continued operation solely for the economic
benefit of the owner
or operator shall not be
sufficient.
Mr. Young and Mr.
Dumelle concur.
I,
Christan L.
Noffett, Clerk of the Ijlinois Pollution
Control Board, her~by certify the ~bove
Interim Order was
adopted on the~q_~ day
of
(flJ.~
,
1979 by a vote of
Christan L. Moff
Clerk
Illinois Pollution
ontrol Board
33—309