ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    September 20, 1979
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Complainant,
    v.
    )
    PCB 78—130
    CITY OF JULIET, a municipal
    )
    corporation,
    Resiondent.
    ORDER OF
    THE
    BOARD
    (by Mr. Young):
    On August
    15, 1979,
    the Environmental Protection Agency
    filed a Notion for Reconsideration and supporting Memorandum
    of Law to reexamine certain conclusions
    in our original
    Opinion on July 12,
    1979.
    On August
    12,
    1979,
    the City of
    Joliet submitted a Response in opposition to the Agency’s
    Motion.
    On July
    12, 1979,
    the Board dismissed Count
    IV of the
    Amended Complaint which alleged that the City of Joliet filed
    a false discharge monitoring report
    (DMR)
    in violation of Rule
    910(f)
    of Chapter
    3:
    Water Pollution Regulations and provisions
    of its NPDES permit.
    The Board dismissed Count IV finding that
    the count was defective.
    The Agency has conceded that the Board was correct in
    finding Count
    IV defective;
    and furthermore,
    that the Board
    is without authority to hear criminal matters or to impose
    criminal sanctions.
    However, the Agency asserts that the
    Board,
    in dicta incorrectly concluded that the Board is with-
    out jurisdiction in matters concerning the submission of false
    information and false reports, and asks the Board to reconsider
    this matter.
    After reviewi:ig the Motion and the Memorandum,
    the Board
    will modify the Opinion of July 12,
    1979, by striking there-
    from the fourth paragraph on page two, which will remove the
    dicta which led to the Motion to Reconsider.
    The
    Agency properly states in their Memorandum that the
    Attorney General
    (or a States Attorney)
    has undisputed discretion
    under the Act to bring civil actions before the Board or to file
    35—369

    —2—
    civil or criminal cases
    in circuit court.
    However, the Attorney
    General may not confer upon the Board subject matter jurisdiction
    simply by the exercise of prosecutorial discretion.
    Having reviewed the text of EPA v
    City of Joliet, PCB 78-
    130
    (July
    12, 1979)
    concerning Count
    IV of the Complaint,
    the
    Board will hereby strike the fourth paragraph on the second
    page of that Opinion and it shall henceforth be held for naught.
    IT IS
    SO ORDE~EC.
    I, Christan
    L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Bo4rd, hereby certif
    the abc e Order was adopted on
    the
    ______________
    day of
    ~
    ,
    1979,
    by a vote
    Christan L. Moffett/
    k
    Illinois Pollution
    C
    rol Board
    35—370

    Back to top