ILLINOIS
    POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    March
    1,
    1979
    NESTLE COMPANY, INCORPORATED,
    Petitioner,
    PCB
    78—191
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    MR.
    DAVID
    G. HASSI, APPEARED ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER;
    MR.
    REED
    W,
    NEUMAN, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, APPEARED ON
    BEHALF
    OF
    RESPONDENT.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Goodman):
    On July 18,
    1978 Nestle
    Company,
    Incorporated,
    (Nestle)
    filed a petition for
    variance before the Board requesting
    relief from Section
    9(a) of the Environmental Protection
    Act (Act)
    and Rule 203(a)
    of the Air Pollution Control Regu-
    lations (Regulations)
    until March 15, 1979 for its instant
    tea manufacturing facility located in Granite City, Madison
    County,
    Illinois,
    A hearing was held in this matter;
    the
    Board
    has
    received no public comment.
    Nestle utilizes
    the spent tea leaves from its process
    as
    fuel for a dryer and a process steam boiler.
    The spent
    leaves are first dried
    in the dryer,
    after which the bulk
    of the dried tea leaves are cycled to the dryer burner
    making the dryer essentially self—sustaining.
    The remainder
    of the dried spent tea leaves are
    utilized along with wood
    chips derived from scrap tea
    chests as fuel for the process
    steam
    boiler.
    Exhaust is through a
    cyclone collector in
    both
    cases,
    which
    in the
    case of the dryer acts primarily
    as
    a dried
    spent
    tea leaf recovery process.
    The calculated
    quantity of
    allowable particulate emissions under Rule 203(a)
    of the Regulations
    is 16,5
    tons per year,
    while present emis-
    sions based on stack tests
    conducted in May, 1978 are about
    58 tons per year.
    Nestle
    proposes to install a second
    high efficiency cyclone,
    and the Agency agrees that the
    proposed cyclone may meet the allowable emissions limit-
    ation under Rule 203(a),
    Nestle has presented a pro-
    posed compliance
    schedule on page
    4 of its July 18, 1978
    petition, which
    was updated by
    a Nestle witness at the
    hearing.
    33—13

    —2—
    Nestle alleges that denial
    of the variance would impose
    a
    financial hardship
    of some $425,000 incurred in operating
    expenses.
    Although
    it believes the financial hardship
    claimed by Nestle
    may be somewhat overstated,
    the Agency
    agrees
    that
    the cost to Nestle
    is substantial.
    The Granite
    City area is
    designated
    as nonattainment for primary par-
    ticulate
    standards,
    However,
    it
    is probable that monitoring
    stations are not substantially
    affected by emissions from
    Nestle since its total emissions presently exceeding the
    standard are less than 50 tons per year of particulate matter,
    and the evidence indicates that most of that weight consists of
    particles of large diameter that settled within the Nestle
    property.
    The Agency believes
    the time requested for the
    installation of the equipment
    is reasonable and recommends
    grant of the proposed variance.
    The Board finds that Nestle cannot presently comply
    with the standards of Rule
    203(a)
    of the Regulations.
    Considering the short
    length of time requested for the
    variance and the apparent lack of environmental harm,
    the Board finds it would be an arbitrary and unreasonable
    hardship on Nestle to deny
    the variance.
    The Board will,
    therefore,
    grant Nestle
    the requested variance until March
    15,
    1979, under certain conditions.
    This Opinion constitutes
    the findings
    of fact and
    conclu-
    sions of law of the
    Board in this matter,
    ORDER
    It is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that
    Nestle Company,
    Incorporated,
    be granted variance from
    Section 9(a)
    of the Environmental Protection Act and
    Rule 203(a)
    of the Air Pollution Control Regulations until
    March
    15,
    1979, for its facility located in Granite City,
    Illinois, under the following
    conditions:
    A.
    Nestle shall execute the proposed schedule of
    compliance contained in
    its July 18, 1978
    petition, which
    petition is incorporated by
    reference as
    if fully set forth herein.
    B.
    Nestle shall post a performance surety bond
    in the amount of $2,000 for the purpose of
    assuring compliance
    with the Regulations
    pursuant to the
    Environmental Protection Act.
    The bond shall be
    submitted
    to the Agency,
    at the following address:
    Environmental
    Protection Agency, Division of Air Pollution
    Control, Control Program Coordinator,
    2200 Churchill Road,
    Springfield,
    Illinois
    62706.
    33—14

    —3—
    C.
    Within 45 days of the adoption of this Order,
    the
    Nestle Company,
    Incorporated,
    shall execute and
    forward to the Illinois Environmental Protection
    Agency,
    2200 Churchill Road,
    Springfield,
    Illinois
    62706
    a Certification of Acceptance and Agreement
    to be bound to all terms and conditions of this
    Order,
    The 45 day period shall be held in abey-
    ance during any period this matter
    is being
    appealed.
    The form of said certification shall
    be
    as follows:
    CERTIFICATION
    I
    (We),
    having read and
    fully understanding the Order of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board
    in PCB
    78-191, hereby accept said Order and agree to be
    bound by all of the terms and conditions thereof.
    SIGNED
    TITLE
    DATE
    I, Christan L.
    Moffett,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board,
    hereby certify the above Opinion and Order
    were adopted on the
    /~
    day of
    ,
    1979 by a vote of
    g-c:)
    Illinois Pol
    Board
    33—15

    Back to top