ILLINOIS
    POLLUTION
    CONTROL
    BOARD
    June
    22,
    1979
    IN THE MATTFR
    OF:
    R79—9
    AMENDMENTS
    TO
    THE
    PROCEDURAL
    RULES.
    PROPOSED
    ORDER
    OF
    THE
    BOARD
    (by
    Mr.
    Dumelle):
    Section 35 of the Environmental Protection Act states
    that variances
    from the limitations prescribed by the Act
    must be consistent with the Clean Water Act, the Safe Drinking
    Water Act,
    the Clean Air Act and the Federal regulations
    under these
    laws,
    In order to insure a complete record
    in
    these matters, the Board proposes the following amendments
    to Procedural Pule
    405,
    New language is indicated by under-
    lining.
    Public comment
    on this proposal will be accepted
    for a period of 60 days
    from the date of this Proposed
    Order.
    405
    Agency Investigation and Recommendation.
    (a)
    After investigating the variance petition and con-
    sidering the views of persons who might he adversely
    affected by the grant of the variance,
    the Agency
    shall within 30 days of the filing of the petition
    or any amendment thereto make
    a recommendation to
    the Board on the disposition of the petition.
    The
    recommendation shall
    include:
    1.
    A description of the efforts made by the
    Agency to investigate the facts as alleged
    and to ascertain the views of persons who
    might be affected and a summary of the views
    so ascertained;
    2,
    A statement of the degree to which,
    if at
    all, the Agency disagrees with the
    facts as
    alleged
    in the petition, including facts
    refuting any allegations in the Petition for
    Variance;
    3.
    Allegations of any other facts the Agency be-
    lieves relevant
    to the disposition of the
    petition;
    4.
    The
    Agency~sestimate of the costs that
    corn—
    pliance would impose on the petitioner and on
    others and of the injury that the grant of
    the variance would impose on the public
    34-113

    —2—
    including the effect that continued discharge
    of contaminants will have upon the environment;
    and,
    5.
    The Agency~sconclusion of what disposition
    should be made of the petition.
    (b)
    All petitions
    for variances
    from the Air Pollution
    Control Regulations shall
    be analyzed in light of
    the Clean Air Act.
    If granting a variance would
    properly be construed ~
    yedcp~p1iance order
    as that term is defined in
    40 C.F.R.
    §65.01(e), the
    recommendation shall indicate whether the requested
    relief is consistent with Section
    113(d)
    of the
    Clean Air Act
    42
    U.S.C.
    §7413(d)
    and 40 C.F.R.
    §~65,O1—65.1Oand 65
    .1~fan~n~y~2e
    would
    require
    a revision of the State Implementation
    Plan,
    the
    recommendation
    shall
    indicate
    whether
    the
    ~
    110(a)
    of the Clean Air Act
    42
    U.S.C. §7410(a)
    and 40 C.F.R.
    Part
    51 have been
    satisfied,
    (c)
    All petitions
    for variance from the Water Pollution
    Control Regulations shall
    be analyzed in light of
    the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.
    §S1251 et seq.).
    Rec-
    ommendations
    in these matters should indicate whether
    granting the requested relief is consistent with
    U.S.
    EPA effluent guidelines and standards, any other
    Federal regulations or any areawide waste treatment
    management plan approved by the Administrator of
    U.S.
    EPA pursuant to Section 208 of the Clean Water
    Act
    (33 U.S.C.
    §1288).
    (d)
    All petitions
    for variances
    from the Public Water
    Supply Regulations shall
    be analyzed
    in light of
    the Safe Drinking Water Act
    (42 U.S.C. 300
    f et seq.).
    Recommendations
    in these matters should indicate
    whether granting the requested relief is consistent
    with the U.S.
    EPA Drinking Water Regulations
    (40
    C,F.R, Part 141),
    (e)*~+ The Agency shall serve
    a copy of its recommenda-
    tion on the petitioner
    in accordance with Rule 305(b).
    Failure of the Agency to timely file its recommenda-
    tion shall
    be grounds for the Hearing Officer to
    adjourn the hearing
    to a date which will allow reason-
    able time to prepare.
    IT
    IS
    SO
    ORDERED,
    34—114

    I,
    Christan
    L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control
    Board, hereby certify the above Proposed Order was
    adopted on the
    day of
    ~
    1979 by a vote
    of
    ______
    ~stanL.~1offelerk
    Illinois
    Pollution
    Control
    Board
    34-115

    Back to top