ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
June
22,
1979
IN THE MATTFR
OF:
R79—9
AMENDMENTS
TO
THE
PROCEDURAL
RULES.
PROPOSED
ORDER
OF
THE
BOARD
(by
Mr.
Dumelle):
Section 35 of the Environmental Protection Act states
that variances
from the limitations prescribed by the Act
must be consistent with the Clean Water Act, the Safe Drinking
Water Act,
the Clean Air Act and the Federal regulations
under these
laws,
In order to insure a complete record
in
these matters, the Board proposes the following amendments
to Procedural Pule
405,
New language is indicated by under-
lining.
Public comment
on this proposal will be accepted
for a period of 60 days
from the date of this Proposed
Order.
405
Agency Investigation and Recommendation.
(a)
After investigating the variance petition and con-
sidering the views of persons who might he adversely
affected by the grant of the variance,
the Agency
shall within 30 days of the filing of the petition
or any amendment thereto make
a recommendation to
the Board on the disposition of the petition.
The
recommendation shall
include:
1.
A description of the efforts made by the
Agency to investigate the facts as alleged
and to ascertain the views of persons who
might be affected and a summary of the views
so ascertained;
2,
A statement of the degree to which,
if at
all, the Agency disagrees with the
facts as
alleged
in the petition, including facts
refuting any allegations in the Petition for
Variance;
3.
Allegations of any other facts the Agency be-
lieves relevant
to the disposition of the
petition;
4.
The
Agency~sestimate of the costs that
corn—
pliance would impose on the petitioner and on
others and of the injury that the grant of
the variance would impose on the public
34-113
—2—
including the effect that continued discharge
of contaminants will have upon the environment;
and,
5.
The Agency~sconclusion of what disposition
should be made of the petition.
(b)
All petitions
for variances
from the Air Pollution
Control Regulations shall
be analyzed in light of
the Clean Air Act.
If granting a variance would
properly be construed ~
yedcp~p1iance order
as that term is defined in
40 C.F.R.
§65.01(e), the
recommendation shall indicate whether the requested
relief is consistent with Section
113(d)
of the
Clean Air Act
42
U.S.C.
§7413(d)
and 40 C.F.R.
§~65,O1—65.1Oand 65
.1~fan~n~y~2e
would
require
a revision of the State Implementation
Plan,
the
recommendation
shall
indicate
whether
the
~
110(a)
of the Clean Air Act
42
U.S.C. §7410(a)
and 40 C.F.R.
Part
51 have been
satisfied,
(c)
All petitions
for variance from the Water Pollution
Control Regulations shall
be analyzed in light of
the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.
§S1251 et seq.).
Rec-
ommendations
in these matters should indicate whether
granting the requested relief is consistent with
U.S.
EPA effluent guidelines and standards, any other
Federal regulations or any areawide waste treatment
management plan approved by the Administrator of
U.S.
EPA pursuant to Section 208 of the Clean Water
Act
(33 U.S.C.
§1288).
(d)
All petitions
for variances
from the Public Water
Supply Regulations shall
be analyzed
in light of
the Safe Drinking Water Act
(42 U.S.C. 300
f et seq.).
Recommendations
in these matters should indicate
whether granting the requested relief is consistent
with the U.S.
EPA Drinking Water Regulations
(40
C,F.R, Part 141),
(e)*~+ The Agency shall serve
a copy of its recommenda-
tion on the petitioner
in accordance with Rule 305(b).
Failure of the Agency to timely file its recommenda-
tion shall
be grounds for the Hearing Officer to
adjourn the hearing
to a date which will allow reason-
able time to prepare.
IT
IS
SO
ORDERED,
34—114
I,
Christan
L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control
Board, hereby certify the above Proposed Order was
adopted on the
day of
~
1979 by a vote
of
______
~stanL.~1offelerk
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
34-115