ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    December 4, 1980
    IN THE MATTER OF:
    PROPOSED
    ANENDMENT
    TO RULES
    )
    R80-7
    502(a)
    and 503(a)
    OF CHAPTER
    )
    ONE, PROCEDURAL RULES
    ADOPTED RULE.
    FINAL ORDER.
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by D. Satchell):
    On April 24,
    1980 the Illinois Environmental Protection
    Agency
    (Agency)
    filed a proposal to amend Procedural Rules
    502(a) (2)
    and 503(a)
    to reflect recent amendments to Section 40
    of the Environmental Protection Act.
    These same rules are sub-
    ject to modification in R80-l5 which is pending before the Board.
    On July 24,
    1980 the Board adopted the Agency proposal for com-
    ment (Proposed Rule, First Notice).
    It was published in Environ—
    mental Register No. 221 on August 5,
    1980 and in Illinois Register
    on August 22, 1980,
    p.
    85.
    The Board received no comment.
    On
    October
    7, 1980 the Board ordered the second notice sent to the
    Joint Committee on Administrative Rules.
    The second notice period
    commenced October 28,
    1980 and concluded November 19,
    1980 with
    no objection.
    In response to comments from the Joint Committee staff, the
    Board will modify the second sentence of Procedural Rule 503(a) (1),
    which concerns commencement of the appeal period, so that
    it
    is
    parallel to the similar provision of the first sentence of Pro-
    cedural Rule 502(a) (2)
    and reads as follows:
    “The petition
    shall be filed within thirty-five days of the ~s~a~ee
    date of
    mailing of the ~erm±~ Agençy~s
    final
    decision to the applicant.
    The Board hereby adopts the amendments to Procedural Rules
    502 and 503 which appear below,
    The Clerk
    is directed to file
    the Rules with the Secretary of State.
    502
    Permit Appeals
    (a)
    Permit Appeals
    Other Than NPDES
    Permit Appeals:
    1.
    If the Agency denies
    the
    permit, it shall advise
    the permit applicant in writing in accordance
    40—91

    —2—
    with the requirements of Section
    39(a)
    of the
    Act.
    2.
    In the case of a denial of a permit or issuance
    by the Agency of a permit with one or more con-
    ditions or limitations to which an applicant ob-
    jects, an applicant who seeks to appeal the Agency
    decision shall file a petition for a hearing before
    the Board within
    35
    days of the date of mailing of
    the Agency~sfinal decision,
    The petition shall
    include:
    (i)
    Citation of the particular standards under
    which a permit is sought;
    (ii)
    A complete and precise description of the
    facility, equipment, vehicle, vessel, or
    aircraft for which a permit is sought,
    including its location;
    (iii)
    A complete description of contaminant
    emissions and of proposed methods for
    their control;
    and
    (iv)
    Such other materials
    as may be necessary
    to demonstrate
    that
    the activity for which
    the permit
    is
    sought will not cause a
    violation of the Act or the regulations.
    3.
    The method of filing service shall be in accordance
    with Rules
    304 and
    305 of
    these Procedural Rules.
    4.
    The Agency shall appear as respondent in the hearing
    and shall, within
    14 days, upon notice of the peti-
    tion, file with the Board the entire Agency record
    of the permit application, including:
    (i)
    The
    application;
    (ii)
    Correspondence with the applicant;
    and
    (iii)
    The denial.
    5.
    The Clerk shall give notice of the petition and
    hearing in accordance with Part III.
    6.
    The proceedings shall be in accordance with the
    Rules set forth in Part III of these Rules.
    Afl—q7

    —3—
    (b)
    NPDES Permit Appeals:
    1.
    If the Agency denies an NPDES Permit, it shall
    advise the permit applicant
    in writing in accordS-
    ance with the requirements of Section
    39(a)
    of
    the Act.
    2.
    In the case of the denial of an NPDES Permit or the
    issuance by the Agency of an NPDES Permit with one
    or more conditions or limitations to which the
    applicant objects, the applicant may contest the
    decision of the Agency by filing with the Clerk of
    the Board a petition for review of the Agency’s
    action in accordance with this Rule.
    3.
    Any
    person other than the applicant who has been a
    party to or participant at an Agency hearing with
    respect to the issuance or denial of an NPDES Permit
    by the Agency, or any person who requested such a
    hearing in accordance with applicable rules, may
    contest the final decision of the Agency by filing
    with the Clerk a petition for review of the Agency’s
    action.
    4.
    The petition
    shall be
    filed and notice issued within
    30 days from the date the Agency’s final decision
    has been mailed to the applicant and all other per-
    sons who have
    right of
    appeal.
    The method of filing
    and service shall be
    in
    accordance with Rules 304
    and 305 of these Procedural Rules,
    5.
    The Agency shall appear as respondent and shall file
    an Answer consisting of the hearing file of any
    hearing which may have been held before the Agency,
    including any exhibits, and the following documents:
    NPDES Permit application, NPDES Permit denial or is-
    suance letter, and all correspondence with the
    applicant concerning the application.
    6.
    All parties other than the petitioner who were parties
    to or participants
    at any
    Agency hearing shall be made
    respondents.
    7.
    The petition shall contain a statement of the decision
    or part thereof to be reviewed.
    The Board upon motion
    of any respondent shall, or upon its own motion may,
    require of the petitioner a specification of the
    errors upon which the petitioner relies in his petition.
    jjfl_q~

    —4—
    8.
    The hearings before the Board shall extend to all
    questions of law and fact presented by the entire
    record.
    The Agency’s findings and conclusions on
    questions of fact shall be prima facie true and
    correct.
    If the Agency’s conclusions of fact are
    disputed by the party or if issues of fact are
    raised in the review proceeding, the Board may make
    its own determination of fact based on the record.
    If any party desires to introduce evidence before
    the Board with respect to any disputed issue of
    fact, the Board shall conduct a de novo hearing and
    receive evidence with respect to such issue of fact.
    9.
    This proceeding shall be in accordance with the rules
    set forth in Part III of these Procedural Rules.
    10.
    The order of the Board entered pursuant to hearing
    may affirm or reverse the decision of the Agency, in
    whole or in part, may remand the proceeding to the
    Agency for the taking of further evidence, or may
    direct the issuance of the permit in such form as it
    deems
    just, based upon the law and the evidence.
    503
    Permit Review
    (a)
    Permit Review for Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites:
    1.
    Any
    person other
    than the applicant or the Agency
    may petition the Board for a hearing to contest the
    issuance of a permit for a hazardous waste disposal
    site.
    The petition shall be filed within 35 days of
    the date of mailing of the Agency’s final decision
    to the applicant.
    The Agency and the applicant shall
    be named co—respondents.
    The Board shall conduct
    a
    public hearing, in accordance with Rule 502 and Part
    III hereof, unless
    it
    determines
    that:
    (A)
    The petition is duplicitous
    or frivolous;
    (B)
    The petitioner is so located as not to be
    affected by
    the
    permitted
    facility; or
    (C)
    The permit was granted for the disposal or
    utilization of sludge from publicly owned
    sewage works,
    2.
    The hearing shall be based exclusively on the record
    before the Agency at the time the permit was issued.
    40—94

    —5—
    The burden of proving that the Agency’s action was
    in violation of the Act or applicable Board regula-
    tions shall be upon the petitioner.
    (b)
    NPDES Permit Review:
    Any person may file a complaint, whether or not a
    party to or participant to
    any
    earlier proceeding
    before the Agency, or for modification, suspension,
    or revocation of an NPDES Permit in accordance with
    Rule 912 of Chapter
    3, Subpart A.
    Such a complaint
    shall be commenced in accordance with Procedural Rule
    304.
    Part III of these Rules shall govern the pro-
    ceeding.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    Mr. Werner abstained,
    I, Christan L. Moffet, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby certify that/the above Opinion and Order
    were adopted on the ~
    day of
    ~
    1980 by a vote
    ~trolBoard
    40—95

    Back to top